Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

WSJ=Tuna Industry Wins Big as Judge In California Rejects Toxic Label

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

WSJ Preview...and the judge says since it occurs "naturally"...what a bunch...because it was not added in...hmmm FREE PREVIEW Tuna Industry Wins Big as Judge In California Rejects Toxic Label By Waldman Word Count: 450 SAN FRANCISCO -- In a resounding victory for the canned-tuna industry, a state-court judge here rejected California's attempt to compel tuna producers to label canned tuna as toxic due to mercury contamination. After a two-month trial, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Dondero ruled federal law pre-empts labeling requirements under the California statute known as Proposition 65. Judge Dondero also ruled in support of two other tuna-industry arguments: That an average serving of tuna contains an insufficient amount of mercury to warrant warning labels, and that mercury contamination of tuna is ...

Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...