Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 We had a doctor give a talk at our ASA conference. This is a man well-respected in the field of neurology research, so I don't really wanna put his name out there. besides, it wasn't who said it as much as what he said. He talked about seratonin transport in autism and how effective SSRI therapy is for many people with autism. And he talked about other drugs, such as zyprexa, helping with dopamine issues. Then he talked about his research showing brain inflamation. I asked him if he's done any research in the use of anti-virals because so many are showing promise in anti-viral trials. Someone else asked about chelation. He stated that he would never use anti-virals or chelation because there are real risks involved and we just don't know the safety. <sigh> Why is it that it's okay in his eyes to use drugs with no known safety but not things that might actually fix the problem? When I asked the specific risks, his colleage cited kidney toxicity from the anti-virals. Okay, that's a real issue that should be addressed. But no one ever seemed to show concern with the side effects of the meds. Let me also say that my daughter does take an SSRI with fantastic results, but I also hate to hear someone shut the door on a potential treatment with reasoning that does not seem to be consistent. Shouldn't the same weight be given in one treatment as another? Debi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.