Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Here is one post from that blog. It was too funny to not post it here: Talk about STUPID!!!!!!!! Alan Kellogg whoever you are I vote you the most stupidest person in the world! " As I understand it, the mercury militia are under the impresson that autism is something that develops in early childhood, when research done on the brains of autistic persons indicates a glitch in embryonic and fetal development. In short, the autistic are wired wrong, and it's something that happens during gestation. Why don't very young infants show autistic behavior? Because the brains of very young infants are not sufficientyl developed to exhibit the sort of complex behaviors found in older infants and young children. In other words, a newborn is simply too stupid to exhibit autistic behavior. " Posted by: Alan Kellogg | May 11, 2006 02:25 PM > > > > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows hard on > thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts on > her blog " Aetiology " . This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and I > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out: > > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 I vote that Alan Kellogg be the first to get the bird flu vaccine.andrea52521991 <mkeller@...> wrote: Here is one post from that blog. It was too funny to not post it here:Talk about STUPID!!!!!!!!Alan Kellogg whoever you are I vote you the most stupidest person in the world!"As I understand it, the mercury militia are under the impresson that autism is something that develops in early childhood, when research done on the brains of autistic persons indicates a glitch in embryonic and fetal development.In short, the autistic are wired wrong, and it's something that happens during gestation.Why don't very young infants show autistic behavior? Because the brains of very young infants are not sufficientyl developed to exhibit the sort of complex behaviors found in older infants and young children. In other words, a newborn is simply too stupid to exhibit autistic behavior."Posted by: Alan Kellogg | May 11, 2006 02:25 PM >> > > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows hard on > thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts on > her blog "Aetiology". This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and I > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out:> > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/>__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Tara C. writes with a glib flipness that will ensure she always remains an assistant. She's assumed the academic mantle of hubris, but lacks the brains to back it up. At least with her perky looks she could model tanks for Abercrombie. I hope she spends more time researching mercury toxicology, for her mother's sake. Hokkanen Minneapolis > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows > hard on thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts on her blog " Aetiology " . This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and I > > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out: > > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Sounds like she can do bit parts as a pharm rep (go TEAM!). Maybe even do the surgery for the docs. Re: Lazy scientists's blog shills for mercury. Care to comment? Tara C. writes with a glib flipness that will ensure she always remains an assistant. She's assumed the academic mantle of hubris, but lacks the brains to back it up. At least with her perky looks she could model tanks for Abercrombie. I hope she spends more time researching mercury toxicology, for her mother's sake. HokkanenMinneapolis> > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows > hard on thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts on her blog "Aetiology". This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and I > > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out:> > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 You will also see some comments on there from a guy named Orac. He's some sort of surgeon or something (it's too irrelevant for me to get his exact credentials). If you see his name, feel free to ask him two questions. 1) Ask him to explain to you how the Danish studies are relevant and actually worth the paper they are written on? Hint: He can't and gets all worked up over the fact that he can't. 2) Ask him to talk about what he thinks about placenta eating? Long story ... Orac has been quoted as saying that studying the role of thimerosal in autism is like " beating a dead horse " . He's a moron. Sue M. > > > > > > > > > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows > hard on > > thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts > on > > her blog " Aetiology " . This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and > I > > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out: > > > > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 I've found that it's quite often therapeutic to tease the deniers, but after some point arguing with them is generally not worth the time spent on them. Re: Lazy scientists's blog shills for mercury. Care to comment? You will also see some comments on there from a guy named Orac. He's some sort of surgeon or something (it's too irrelevant for me to get his exact credentials). If you see his name, feel free to ask him two questions. 1) Ask him to explain to you how the Danish studies are relevant and actually worth the paper they are written on? Hint: He can't and gets all worked up over the fact that he can't. 2) Ask him to talk about what he thinks about placenta eating? Long story ... Orac has been quoted as saying that studying the role of thimerosal in autism is like "beating a dead horse". He's a moron. Sue M. > >> > > > > > > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows > hard on > > thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts > on > > her blog "Aetiology". This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and > I > > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out:> > > > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 Hi, I agree it's generally not worth the time to comment on the blogs, but from time to time I can't help injecting some reality into their discussions. Once mercury is finally and completely removed from childhood vaccines, I wonder if the Orac's of the world will be sad if the autism rate continues to drop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows > > hard on > > > thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the > facts > > on > > > her blog " Aetiology " . This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine > and > > I > > > think some of you might want to check out her public display of > > > ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out: > > > > > > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2006 Report Share Posted May 12, 2006 I posted Dr. Lucier's quote onto Tara C. 's website: Dr. Lucier, toxicologist and former director of the Environmental Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences says, " Thimerosal contains organic mercury. Organic mercury is a known developmental neurotoxin and the fetus and infants are at special risk. Public health policies should not allow infants to be purposely injected with organic mercury. " One of my colleagues always says, " Don't stop to stone the devil's dogs. " But every once in a while it's amusing to indulge in the same caustic, self-serving posturing some substitute for medical dialogue. - Hokkanen > > Tara C. is an epidemiologist at the U. of Iowa who blows hard on thimerosal issues without the slightest understanding of the facts on her blog " Aetiology " . This bolg is sponsored by Seed Magazine and I think some of you might want to check out her public display of ignorance and comment on her feedback page. Check it out: > > > > http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/skepticism/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.