Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 federal law supercedes --so I am sure the feds will be in there busting some butt on that one. Denver has LEGALIZED WEED the city of Denver has legalized the possession of 1 once of weed for adults over the age of 21. The city law has passed but the state of Colorado is pushing state law instead of recognizing the new city law. Many people that are protected by this law are now being fined for what is accepted....Austin Chronicle: Weed Watch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Hey - up here in the great white, you can even write off your (medicinal) marijuana this tax year as a medical deduction (at least that was tabled by the previous federal party before they got the boot). How do I know that? I saw it today in a recent newsletter about '06 tax deductions and what may or may not fly (since the recent change in gov't) - honest... Gotta love Canada. Hey, even if this particular Liberal policy causes flashbacks to Reefer Madness, just remember the recent post here - the one that mentioned the likelihood that Frist will be the next GOP presidential candidate - I mean, legalized pot makes for a great debate, but " President Frist " ? Could pot or anything else be that stupifying? Besides, imagine if Pharma had a patent on this one - every second commercial on prime-time would be loaded down with smiley happy pot-heads, and a friendly voice urging you to go ask your doctor about " Canna-brex " . > > federal law supercedes --so I am sure the feds will be in there busting some butt on that one. > Denver has LEGALIZED WEED > > > > the city of Denver has legalized the possession > of 1 once of weed for adults over the age of 21. > The city law has passed but the state of Colorado > is pushing state law instead of recognizing the > new city law. Many people that are protected by > this law are now being fined for what is accepted.... > > Austin Chronicle: Weed Watch > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 If Frist becomes president, we're all gonna need A LOT of pot!!!!!!!! Re: Denver has LEGALIZED WEED Hey - up here in the great white, you can even write off your (medicinal) marijuana this tax year as a medical deduction (at least that was tabled by the previous federal party before they got the boot). How do I know that? I saw it today in a recent newsletter about '06 tax deductions and what may or may not fly (since the recent change in gov't) - honest... Gotta love Canada. Hey, even if this particular Liberal policy causes flashbacks to Reefer Madness, just remember the recent post here - the one that mentioned the likelihood that Frist will be the next GOP presidential candidate - I mean, legalized pot makes for a great debate, but " President Frist " ? Could pot or anything else be that stupifying? Besides, imagine if Pharma had a patent on this one - every second commercial on prime-time would be loaded down with smiley happy pot-heads, and a friendly voice urging you to go ask your doctor about " Canna-brex " . > > federal law supercedes --so I am sure the feds will be in there busting some butt on that one. > Denver has LEGALIZED WEED > > > > the city of Denver has legalized the possession > of 1 once of weed for adults over the age of 21. > The city law has passed but the state of Colorado > is pushing state law instead of recognizing the > new city law. Many people that are protected by > this law are now being fined for what is accepted.... > > Austin Chronicle: Weed Watch > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 It's gonna take a lot more than pot for me, if Frist becomes president!! I'm packing up the kids and moving to a deserted island! > > > > federal law supercedes --so I am sure the feds will be in there > busting some butt on that one. > > Denver has LEGALIZED WEED > > > > > > > > the city of Denver has legalized the possession > > of 1 once of weed for adults over the age of 21. > > The city law has passed but the state of Colorado > > is pushing state law instead of recognizing the > > new city law. Many people that are protected by > > this law are now being fined for what is accepted.... > > > > Austin Chronicle: Weed Watch > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Do keep in mind that most of Frist's votes came from Tenn. people. ( I am trying to keep a stiff upper lip). King <medfordkings1@...> wrote: It's gonna take a lot more than pot for me, if Frist becomes president!! I'm packing up the kids and moving to a deserted island!> >> > federal law supercedes --so I am sure the feds will be in there> busting some butt on that one.> > Denver has LEGALIZED WEED> > > > > > > > the city of Denver has legalized the possession > > of 1 once of weed for adults over the age of 21. > > The city law has passed but the state of Colorado > > is pushing state law instead of recognizing the > > new city law. Many people that are protected by > > this law are now being fined for what is accepted....> > > > Austin Chronicle: Weed Watch > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Gore didn't get the majority of votes in Presidential election & he was from here, too. BTW, NOT that I like him, but I heard a snipit on Mike Savage tonight. He calls him " fist " and echoed what I have been saying, that Frist doesn't have a chance. Savage is a right-wing nut, so he does speak for a vocal minority. Debi, right-winger (non-nut) in TN > > Do keep in mind that most of Frist's votes came from Tenn. people. ( I am trying to keep a stiff upper lip). > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 And your point is. . .? From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of LenaSent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:42 AMEOHarm Subject: Denver has LEGALIZED WEED the city of Denver has legalized the possession of 1 once of weed for adults over the age of 21. The city law has passed but the state of Colorado is pushing state law instead of recognizing the new city law. Many people that are protected by this law are now being fined for what is accepted....Austin Chronicle: Weed Watch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 That we should move to Denver? <g> Debi, the clean & sober > > And your point is. . .? > > _____ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Someone emailed me that there was another good article she read about marijuana but she forgot where it was and besides, couldn't figure out how to download it. Lenny Marijuana again tied to memory, learning problems Last Updated: 2006-03-13 16:00:40 -0400 (Reuters Health) By Amy Norton NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who regularly smoke marijuana may find their memories growing hazy over time, a study published Monday suggests. In a study of long-term and shorter-term marijuana users, researchers in Greece found that both groups performed more poorly on tests of memory, attention and other cognitive abilities than a comparison group who'd only occasionally used the drug. Long-term users - who'd smoked four or more joints per week for at least 10 years - showed the greatest deficits. The findings, published in the journal Neurology, add to the conflicting body of research on the effects of marijuana on the brain. While many studies have suggested that long-time pot smoking dulls memory, attention span and mental acuity, some have found no large differences in these skills between marijuana users and non-users. One recent analysis of 15 studies found only minor effects on memory among long-time pot users, and no clear effect on attention, language, reasoning and a number of other cognitive functions. One problem is that it's difficult for studies such as the current one to establish a definite cause-and-effect relationship between marijuana and intellectual deficits, Dr. Lambros Messinis, the study's lead author, told Reuters Health. Though the researchers accounted for a number of variables -- like education, use of other drugs and the presence of clinical depression -- it's tough to control for all the factors that could make heavy marijuana users different from other people, according to Messinis. Still, he and his colleagues say, their findings are in line with certain past studies linking heavy, long-term pot smoking to " subtle " deficits in intellectual abilities. The study included 40 marijuana users ages 17 to 49 who were in a drug abuse treatment program; all had used the drug frequently for at least five years, but half -- those considered long-term users -- had smoked for 10 years or more. They were compared with 24 adults the same age who had used pot no more than 20 times in their lives. Overall, both long- and shorter-term marijuana users performed more poorly on tests of memory, attention and mental-processing speed. The proportion of study participants deemed " impaired, " according to the researchers, was highest in the long-term group and lowest in the comparison group. Long-time pot users showed the greatest problems on tests where they were asked to learn and remember a series of words. They were " significantly " below the published norms for these tests, according to Messinis and his colleagues. It's not yet clear whether the intellectual deficits linked to marijuana are lasting, Messinis said, but research " generally supports " the notion that these problems are reversible after longer periods of abstinence. People in his study were required to have been abstinent only for the 24 hours before taking the tests. Another unknown, according to Messinis, is whether marijuana use at a young age may affect the brain differently than use during adulthood. Knowledge in this area, he said, is still " poor. " SOURCE: Neurology, March 14, 2006. > > > > And your point is. . .? > > > > _____ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 You crack me up on a regular basis Lenny! " schaferatsprynet " <schafer@...> Sent by: EOHarm 03/14/2006 04:43 PM Please respond to EOHarm To EOHarm cc Subject Re: Denver has LEGALIZED WEED Someone emailed me that there was another good article she read about marijuana but she forgot where it was and besides, couldn't figure out how to download it. Lenny Marijuana again tied to memory, learning problems Last Updated: 2006-03-13 16:00:40 -0400 (Reuters Health) By Amy Norton NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who regularly smoke marijuana may find their memories growing hazy over time, a study published Monday suggests. In a study of long-term and shorter-term marijuana users, researchers in Greece found that both groups performed more poorly on tests of memory, attention and other cognitive abilities than a comparison group who'd only occasionally used the drug. Long-term users - who'd smoked four or more joints per week for at least 10 years - showed the greatest deficits. The findings, published in the journal Neurology, add to the conflicting body of research on the effects of marijuana on the brain. While many studies have suggested that long-time pot smoking dulls memory, attention span and mental acuity, some have found no large differences in these skills between marijuana users and non-users. One recent analysis of 15 studies found only minor effects on memory among long-time pot users, and no clear effect on attention, language, reasoning and a number of other cognitive functions. One problem is that it's difficult for studies such as the current one to establish a definite cause-and-effect relationship between marijuana and intellectual deficits, Dr. Lambros Messinis, the study's lead author, told Reuters Health. Though the researchers accounted for a number of variables -- like education, use of other drugs and the presence of clinical depression -- it's tough to control for all the factors that could make heavy marijuana users different from other people, according to Messinis. Still, he and his colleagues say, their findings are in line with certain past studies linking heavy, long-term pot smoking to " subtle " deficits in intellectual abilities. The study included 40 marijuana users ages 17 to 49 who were in a drug abuse treatment program; all had used the drug frequently for at least five years, but half -- those considered long-term users -- had smoked for 10 years or more. They were compared with 24 adults the same age who had used pot no more than 20 times in their lives. Overall, both long- and shorter-term marijuana users performed more poorly on tests of memory, attention and mental-processing speed. The proportion of study participants deemed " impaired, " according to the researchers, was highest in the long-term group and lowest in the comparison group. Long-time pot users showed the greatest problems on tests where they were asked to learn and remember a series of words. They were " significantly " below the published norms for these tests, according to Messinis and his colleagues. It's not yet clear whether the intellectual deficits linked to marijuana are lasting, Messinis said, but research " generally supports " the notion that these problems are reversible after longer periods of abstinence. People in his study were required to have been abstinent only for the 24 hours before taking the tests. Another unknown, according to Messinis, is whether marijuana use at a young age may affect the brain differently than use during adulthood. Knowledge in this area, he said, is still " poor. " SOURCE: Neurology, March 14, 2006. > > > > And your point is. . .? > > > > _____ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Had to laugh out loud on that article! My first thought was " DUH! " I worked the restaurant industry for 8 years. Every night during the dinner rush our kitchen would go down in a ball of flames. All the kitchen staff were regular dope smokers and when it would get busy you'd see them all standing there, staring at the tickets with glassy eyes as if they couldn't get the images of the words to absorb from their eyes into their brains. Best part was when they'd go out back and light up their pipes for their 4th hit of the day, assuring me " ...but I'm not addicted. Been smoking for 10 years, but I'm not addicted. " Debi > > > > > > And your point is. . .? > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Why do you think they call it DOPE? As my pappy once told me, if you must get high, son, use a ladder. Having said all that, I will hasten to add: Everything in moderation -- and that includes moderation. So, if any of you ever catch me personally in a rare hypocritical moment, then . .. .I forgot the rejoinder. . .what were we talking about. . ? Lenny > > Had to laugh out loud on that article! My first thought was " DUH! " -snip- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.