Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 Anyone see any hypocrisy here? PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 197-205 Direct quotes from an document published by the American Academy of Pediatrics: " Thimerosal used to irrigate the external auditory canals in a child with tympanostomy tubes has caused severe mercury poisoning. " " Mercury in all of its forms is toxic to the fetus and children " " Inorganic and elemental mercury should not be present in the home or other environments of children " " It would seem prudent for the FDA to carefully examine all uses of mercury in pharmaceuticals, particularly pharmaceuticals that are used by infants and pregnant women. " http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/108/1/197 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005 I couldn't agree more. I first saw this page two days ago when McDonough (FAIR's fundraising director) showed it to me in the Illinois Biomedical Kids group. I'm going to mine it for material to use in 's banner at the rally!!! FAIR Autism Media http://www.autismmedia.org/ > that should make a nice quote for the signs for the AAP conference > demonstration at the rally in october www.nationalforce.org > > A.A.P.: " Thimerosal...has caused severe mercury poisoning " > > > > Anyone see any hypocrisy here? > > > > PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 197-205 > > > > Direct quotes from an document published by the American Academy of > > Pediatrics: > > > > " Thimerosal used to irrigate the external auditory canals in a child > > with tympanostomy tubes has caused severe mercury poisoning. " > > > > " Mercury in all of its forms is toxic to the fetus and children " > > > > " Inorganic and elemental mercury should not be present in the home or > > other environments of children " > > > > " It would seem prudent for the FDA to carefully examine all uses of > > mercury in pharmaceuticals, particularly pharmaceuticals that are > > used by infants and pregnant women. " > > > > http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/108/1/197 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 trophyfish2, In answer to your question: " Anyone see any hypocrisy here? " I see at least four (4) hypocrisies: 1. The hypocrisy of the American Academy of Pediatrics, who remains blind to the truth that Thimerosal in vaccines " has caused severe mercury poisoning " though, for one moment, they did see the harm of Thimerosal in ear drops. 2. The hypocrisy of our government, who, through the FDA, continues to permit the use of Thimerosal-containing medicines, including, vaccines, ear and eye drops, serums, and other drugs that have " caused severe mercury poisoning " without scienticcally sound experimental proof of what is a safe level of Thimerosal in any of these medicines. 3. The hypocrisy of the pharmaceutical, medical, and healthcare industries who claim to be interested in the health of the public but, in reality, have been integral players in the ongoing mercury poisoning of the Americans from birth onwards -- mercury poisoning that has seemingly helped fatten their bottom lines. 4. The hypocrisy of the advocates for those who have been clinically mercury poisoned, who continue to use the Establishment labels for the harm done (e.g., autism, ADHD, etc.) instead of labeling the harm for what it is: some degree of clinical mercury poisoning. I am sure that there are other hypocrisies, but these are the most glaring ones that I see. Hopefully, others will add the ones they see to this list or, better still, wake up, call a Thimerosal 49.55% mercury) what it is, the carrier for the severe SYSTEMIC bio-acummu- lative mercury poison (not just a " neurotoxin " ) that has harmed them, their progenitors, and their offspring, and join in shouting out the reality, which the scientifically sound experimental data clearly supports: " Thimerosal (49.55% mercury) causes mercury poisoning. " Respectfully, Dr. King http://www.dr-king.com PS: Please got to http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org and read, study, download, and share the top three documents posted there: 1. Thimerosal (49.55% Mercury) Causes Mercury Poisoning - A Rebuttal to Dr. Novella's Views 2. Dr. Haley's Supporting Slides for Mercury Causes Mercury Poisoning 3. Mercury Emissions [Notes: a. The first document is a comprehensive 1.48 MB document that addresses some truly " vaccine issues " and then makes the scientific case for: " Thimerosal (49.55% mercury) causes mercury poisoning. " b. If you have any trouble downloading the first file BECAUSE OF ITS " .pdf " FORMAT, please let me know directly.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ At 13:03 9/8/05 -0000, trophyfish2 wrote: >Anyone see any hypocrisy here? > >PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, pp. 197-205 > >Direct quotes from an document published by the American Academy of >Pediatrics: > > " Thimerosal used to irrigate the external auditory canals in a child >with tympanostomy tubes has caused severe mercury poisoning. " > > " Mercury in all of its forms is toxic to the fetus and children " > > " Inorganic and elemental mercury should not be present in the home or >other environments of children " > > " It would seem prudent for the FDA to carefully examine all uses of >mercury in pharmaceuticals, particularly pharmaceuticals that are >used by infants and pregnant women. " > >http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/108/1/197 > > > >... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.