Re: Laidler's study made the main page

[Guest guest]

on 7/5/05 7:11 PM, Blaxill Mark at blaxill.mark@... wrote:

In case you've ever questioned the power of the public health community to place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the main page and you'll see this piece of crap featured.

Orwell is with us

http://www./

do you mean the aspirin story?

-

[Guest guest]

Not much there except propaganda, which of course is the point. We

always knew the DOE numbers were not the cleanest. I have routinely

warned my readers about this. Still Laidler's conclusion is that

" there may still be an autism epidemic in the United States " as quoted

in the article makes this hit piece weak. In my opinion, our

counter-propaganda is to characterize business like this as the work

of autism holocaust deniers with an anti-child, pro-pharma agenda.

A question to raise to the public is why is the government dragging

its feet with finding out the numbers and the causes and instead does

this steady stream of alibis-for-mercury research.

Lenny

> In case you've ever questioned the power of the public health community

> to place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the main page and you'll see

> this piece of crap featured.

>

> Orwell is with us

>

> http://www./

>

>

> This e-mail message may contain confidential and/or privileged

information. If you are not an addressee or otherwise authorized to

receive this message, you should not use, copy, disclose or take any

action based on this e-mail or any information contained in the

message. If you have received this material in error, please advise

the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.

> Thank you.

[Guest guest]

I forgot to note that Reuters news service is in serious financial

trouble and relies heavily on pharmacuetical largess.

Lenny

[Guest guest]

nah, it went away pretty quick, here's the link to the AP piece

http://news./news?

tmpl=story & u=/nm/20050705/hl_nm/autism_rate_dc_1

>

>

> In case you've ever questioned the power of the public health

community to

> place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the main page and you'll see

this piece

> of crap featured.

>

> Orwell is with us

>

> http://www./

>

>

>

> do you mean the aspirin story?

>

> -

[Guest guest]

ah yes, but whoever actually reads the article. the propaganda is the

point, as you say, and the title says it all.

> > In case you've ever questioned the power of the public health

community

> > to place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the main page and you'll

see

> > this piece of crap featured.

> >

> > Orwell is with us

> >

> > http://www./

> >

> >

> > This e-mail message may contain confidential and/or privileged

> information. If you are not an addressee or otherwise authorized to

> receive this message, you should not use, copy, disclose or take any

> action based on this e-mail or any information contained in the

> message. If you have received this material in error, please advise

> the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.

> > Thank you.

[Guest guest]

Lenny,

FYI,

Sir Hogg is CEO of GlaxoKline and Reuters.

Robby

Re: Laidler's study made the main page

I forgot to note that Reuters news service is in serious financialtrouble and relies heavily on pharmacuetical largess.Lenny

[Guest guest]

Hey Mark. I predicted this last night when I saw it in UK and

Malaysia. On , it is listed now as # 2, as " most popular-most

emailed " story. If people want to change that rating, go to

http://tinyurl.com/dyx4q

then go to bottom and give it ONE star.....play fire with fire...

> >

> >

> > In case you've ever questioned the power of the public health

> community to

> > place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the main page and you'll see

> this piece

> > of crap featured.

> >

> > Orwell is with us

> >

> > http://www./

> >

> >

> >

> > do you mean the aspirin story?

> >

> > -

[Guest guest]

Probably everyone knows the answer to this

except me. Why has Laidler done such a 180 on autism issues? I

talked with him at a DAN conference a few years back and given his comments

then, I’m surprised at what he’s publishing. Something must

have happened. Feel free to e-mail me privately if you want.

Vicky

Re: Laidler's

study made the main page

Not much there except propaganda, which of course is

the point. We

always knew the DOE numbers were not the

cleanest. I have routinely

warned my readers about this. Still

Laidler's conclusion is that

" there may still be an autism epidemic in the

United States " as quoted

in the article makes this hit piece weak. In

my opinion, our

counter-propaganda is to characterize business

like this as the work

of autism holocaust deniers with an anti-child,

pro-pharma agenda.

A question to raise to the public is why is the

government dragging

its feet with finding out the numbers and the

causes and instead does

this steady stream of alibis-for-mercury

research.

Lenny

> In case you've ever questioned the power of

the public health community

> to place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the

main page and you'll see

> this piece of crap featured.

>

> Orwell is with us

>

> http://www./

>

>

> This e-mail message may contain confidential

and/or privileged

information. If you are not an addressee or

otherwise authorized to

receive this message, you should not use, copy,

disclose or take any

action based on this e-mail or any information

contained in the

message. If you have received this material in

error, please advise

the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete

this message.

> Thank you.

[Guest guest]

Laidler's article sends mixed messages. Just maybe the MIB realized that Laidler carries big credibility baggage and cleaned it up. There must be no perception of a cover-up.

Re: Laidler's study made the main page

ah yes, but whoever actually reads the article. the propaganda is the point, as you say, and the title says it all.> > In case you've ever questioned the power of the public health community> > to place stories, go RIGHT NOW to the main page and you'll see> > this piece of crap featured.> > > > Orwell is with us> > > > http://www./> > > > > > This e-mail message may contain confidential and/or privileged> information. If you are not an addressee or otherwise authorized to> receive this message, you should not use, copy, disclose or take any> action based on this e-mail or any information contained in the> message. If you have received this material in error, please advise> the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. > > Thank you.