poryphirin test - any clues

[Guest guest]

We got this back and the results are:

Uroporhyrins at 18 (ref of 7-14) slightly increased

Heptacarobxy porphirin 5.8 (1.5-3.5) increased

Hexacaroboxy 1.8 (.4-.8) increased

Pentacarboxy 5.7 (1.0-2.9) increased

Preco 19.4 (2.5) very high rate

Coproporphyrins 135 (50-90) increased

Ratios

PrCP/UP 1.1 (.3-.6) increased

prCP/CP 14.3 (4-8) increased

UP/CP 0.13 (0.14-.18) (normal)

but what does it all mean? the commentary is very thin. The last

bit says " Urinary Poryphirin profile suggestive a moderate mercury

toxic effect on bodily physiology " .

I hate ordering tests and then not really understanding the results!!

Steph x

[Guest guest]

In short it means

Hg - Mercury toxicity is an issue,

Mercury Chelation ought to be considered.

- Mercury might also cover a Lead toxic impact, but that can`t be

read out of the results.

Geir Flatabø

On 11/25/06, stephaniesirr <mark.grabiec@...> wrote:

> We got this back and the results are:

>

> Uroporhyrins at 18 (ref of 7-14) slightly increased

> Heptacarobxy porphirin 5.8 (1.5-3.5) increased

> Hexacaroboxy 1.8 (.4-.8) increased

> Pentacarboxy 5.7 (1.0-2.9) increased

> Preco 19.4 (2.5) very high rate

> Coproporphyrins 135 (50-90) increased

>

> Ratios

>

> PrCP/UP 1.1 (.3-.6) increased

> prCP/CP 14.3 (4-8) increased

> UP/CP 0.13 (0.14-.18) (normal)

>

> but what does it all mean? the commentary is very thin. The last

> bit says " Urinary Poryphirin profile suggestive a moderate mercury

> toxic effect on bodily physiology " .

>

> I hate ordering tests and then not really understanding the results!!

>

> Steph x

>

>

>

> DISCLAIMER

> No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. If

you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified practitioner.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Geir

We used TD DMPS for about a year and there were some good

improvements but all that showed up as excreted in great quantities

was lead. We did an EDTA IV in spring which shifted loads of lead

and then were doing suppositories for a while but Tom hated them. I

wonder if we should go back to TD DMPS. Tom never tolerated the 8

hourly dosing but he was fine with Buttar principle dosing. OR do

we keep going with lead working on the principle that the mercury

can't get out til the lead does. Does everyone still think that's

the case?

Steph x

> > We got this back and the results are:

> >

> > Uroporhyrins at 18 (ref of 7-14) slightly increased

> > Heptacarobxy porphirin 5.8 (1.5-3.5) increased

> > Hexacaroboxy 1.8 (.4-.8) increased

> > Pentacarboxy 5.7 (1.0-2.9) increased

> > Preco 19.4 (2.5) very high rate

> > Coproporphyrins 135 (50-90) increased

> >

> > Ratios

> >

> > PrCP/UP 1.1 (.3-.6) increased

> > prCP/CP 14.3 (4-8) increased

> > UP/CP 0.13 (0.14-.18) (normal)

> >

> > but what does it all mean? the commentary is very thin. The last

> > bit says " Urinary Poryphirin profile suggestive a moderate

mercury

> > toxic effect on bodily physiology " .

> >

> > I hate ordering tests and then not really understanding the

results!!

> >

> > Steph x

> >

> >

> >

> > DISCLAIMER

> > No information contained in this post is to be construed as

medical advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a

suitably qualified practitioner.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

,

You might find that after this time off of td-dmps that he tolerates the 8 hour schedule much better. I think people who moved right from the Buttar schedule to 8 hour sometimes had trouble, but thinking this would not be true with the break. Maybe Mandi would have some idea as she successfully transitioned Sam to the 8 hour.

Same here, we got lead with td-dmps, we didn't have much to start with, but we got it, also some decent mercury pulls. We are currently chelating now with oral dmps/ala and seeing good metal pulls, anyway you can get the oral? Is this something available in the UK?

Re: poryphirin test - any clues

Hi GeirWe used TD DMPS for about a year and there were some good improvements but all that showed up as excreted in great quantities was lead. We did an EDTA IV in spring which shifted loads of lead and then were doing suppositories for a while but Tom hated them. I wonder if we should go back to TD DMPS. Tom never tolerated the 8 hourly dosing but he was fine with Buttar principle dosing. OR do we keep going with lead working on the principle that the mercury can't get out til the lead does. Does everyone still think that's the case?Steph x> > We got this back and the results are:> >> > Uroporhyrins at 18 (ref of 7-14) slightly increased> > Heptacarobxy porphirin 5.8 (1.5-3.5) increased> > Hexacaroboxy 1.8 (.4-.8) increased> > Pentacarboxy 5.7 (1.0-2.9) increased> > Preco 19.4 (2.5) very high rate> > Coproporphyrins 135 (50-90) increased> >> > Ratios> >> > PrCP/UP 1.1 (.3-.6) increased> > prCP/CP 14.3 (4-8) increased> > UP/CP 0.13 (0.14-.18) (normal)> >> > but what does it all mean? the commentary is very thin. The last> > bit says "Urinary Poryphirin profile suggestive a moderate mercury> > toxic effect on bodily physiology".> >> > I hate ordering tests and then not really understanding the results!!> >> > Steph x> >> >> >> > DISCLAIMER> > No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified practitioner.> >> >