Guest guest Posted September 23, 2003 Report Share Posted September 23, 2003 >>>>Secondly, Enig's figures aren't *her* primary research, but she cites enormous multi-volume lipid encyclopedias which are presumably based on large amounts of research, so it isn't like citing one study at all. ------>i wouldn't presume they're based on large amounts of research at all! i believe much of her food composition figures come from the USDA database, which i'm sure you already know is not a particularly reliable source. of course she lists other citations for different parts of the book, but i don't think we can automatically *assume* she got her food comp #s for WGO and palm oil from " enormous multi-volume lipid encyclopedias " . in fact, she specifically cites the USDA on the composition of fats and oils for the chapter where she lists the fatty acid and vit. E content of WGO and palm oil. so i think it's much more reasonable to assume that that is the source for her #s. in any case, my only point was, dismissing data from commercial sources carte blanche is not a valid approach. and when they throw a wrench in your paradigm, perhaps it's worth taking a closer look and maybe revising, rather than dismissing them off hand. as to the rest of your post, thank you for succinctly stating your main point in this email regarding the cost. i barely spend a fraction of $500 on WGO a year! LOL more like $40/year. however, if your latest calculations are correct, then it's obviously a poor investment. and now that i realize i read the SP WGO label wrong, i really don't need convincing that WGO is not a worthwhile investment as a vit. E source. since i misread the lable, i had been thinking all along that i was getting 385 IUs *vit E* from each perle. (btw, SP claims WGO is 65% by weight the most biologically active forms of vit E, so it wasn't unreasonable to believe there could be 385 IUs in a perle.) i have no idea how i missed the fact that this is actually the *WGO* amount. never mind the vit E in *CLO*, i get a ton more from my multivitamin! so now that i've checked various sources, plus read some of your figures, the vit. E content in 385 mgs WGO is so small that it's clearly not worth buying for a vit. E source. however, palm oil doesn't look like a particularly abundant source either. LOL they're both a lot lower than i'm looking for. oh well, other than isolated vitamin E extract supplements, palm oil seems to be a reasonable natural source, although whether any given brand contains all the tocotrienols and tocopherols seems unclear. perhaps the data showing some samples of palm oil only contain 4-7 of the 8 vit. E compounds is from *RDB* palm oil..? but i do like the fact that it's quite saturated and has a good amount of carotenes. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.