Guest guest Posted September 21, 2003 Report Share Posted September 21, 2003 In a message dated 9/21/03 3:20:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lyn122@... writes: > Heidi...I've not heard of high insulin causing depressed delta six > desaturase enzyme. It's not something I know much about. Could you > point me in the direction of more info on this? While I'm sure he's not reccomended reading on this list, Barry Sears is BIG on this issue. His books are fantastic in the care he takes to make his case scientifically to a popular audience. But they probably don't offer you much if you are looking for experimental data. Too many bad dietary recommendations to boot. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2003 Report Share Posted September 22, 2003 >Heidi...I've not heard of high insulin causing depressed delta six >desaturase enzyme. It's not something I know much about. Could you >point me in the direction of more info on this? Sorry, no, just saw it in that one article. >And (not to start another debate) but here's one more question on >lignans. A while ago I remember a study that used 2 tbls of ground >flax daily in muffins to equal tamoxifin treatment with breast >cancer patients. The study came out from Canada (where flax is grown) >so I've wondered about it. I have read somewhere that flax DOES kill cancer cells. But it does so via a kind of toxicity -- it's not very good for healthy cells. >What I like to know is if it's necessarily bad to use phytoestrogens >to help rev up the estrogen when it's declining. My understanding is >that the man-made estrogenic compounds bind to estrogen receiving >sites when not enough is being produced. The phytoestrogens prevent >this from taking place by getting in there first. Is this a bad >thing??? Or maybe I'm way off in my thinking. Theoretically it *could* be ok. There just isn't enough info on it, I think. I've come to believe that Americans are REALLY fouled up in the hormone dept. for reasons other than phytoestrogens (pros or cons) so all these epidemiological studies don't tell the whole story. What about Ori's take, for example, that wheat is estrogenic? And 40% of the American diet is wheat, up 30% in the last 10 years? Or all the hormones in milk, also way up since the cows get added hormones? Or the fact that fat cells also produce estrogen, and the majority of Americans are now overweight? Or that fact that dioxin (in everything now) messes up hormones? It's just too complicated to talk about one factor. Personally I think that if a woman has a good diet and has no intolerances to what she is eating, she won't get osteoporosis or breast cancer, and phytoestrogens wouldn't be needed, but this isn't based on anything scientific, just a gut feeling. The majority of people I've met with osteoporosis were gluten intolerant (it decidedly messes up calcium usage) and that or similar problems also mess up the immune system so cancer can thrive. However, I have yet to live through menopause :--) -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.