Guest guest Posted August 10, 2003 Report Share Posted August 10, 2003 Hi Folks, Would like to know your thoughts on the following article. Should we be concerned about this? Are our raw milk and meat supplies tested for this organism? TIA -Vee > http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1013657,00.html > > Bowel diseases linked to bug in milk > > Researchers alert government to potential 'public health tragedy' > > Meikle, health correspondent > Thursday August 7, 2003 > The Guardian > > Changes to the way milk and water are prepared for human consumption may be > needed to fight " a public health tragedy " linked to a bug causing illness in > hundreds of thousands of people, it was claimed last night. > Researchers believe they have found the strongest association yet between a > disease commonly found in livestock and Crohn's disease, a condition of the > digestive tract suffered by about one in 600 of the population. > > But they also strongly suspect a connection between the bug which is > responsible for a disease in cattle and irritable bowel syndrome, which affects > as many as one in 10 people and costs the NHS more than £700m annually. > > Professor Hermon-, of St 's hospital medical school, south > London, has alerted the chief medical officer, Professor Sir Liam son, to > the " huge public health issue " that might be raised. > > It is believed that Sir Liam has asked his advisers on infectious diseases to > examine the new evidence. > > Prof Hermon- is trying to develop a vaccine against Mycobacterium avium > subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) as a treatment for Crohn's disease and is > shortly to test it on mice. > > Research by his team and others suggests that MAP, which infects cattle, is > infiltrating water supplies and defeating the milk pasteurisation process. > > Links between MAP, which has been found in 2% of pasteurised milk cartons, and > Crohn's disease have been investigated for some years. In 1998 the government's > advisory committee on dangerous pathogens decided that a link could not be > demonstrated by the available evidence. > > Crohn's is a debilitating condition involving chronic diarrhoea, abdominal > pain, weight loss and fatigue. An estimated 100,000 Britons have it, with 5,000 > new patients a year. It can, with complications, be fatal. > > Using sophisticated DNA techniques, Dr Hermon-'s team found that samples > taken from 34 of 37 patients with Crohn's contained the MAP bug. > > Three patients with irritable bowel syndrome, a condition with more > intermittent pain, constipation and/or diarrhoea, were also tested for MAP. It > was found in all three. > > Professor Hermon- said: " The association between the MAP bug and Crohn's > is highly significant. " But the IBS link was unexpected. > > " In animals MAP inflames the nerves of the gut, " he said. " Recent work from > Sweden shows that people with IBS also have inflamed gut nerves. There is a > real chance that the MAP bug may be inflaming people's gut nerves and causing > irritable bowel syndrome. " > > The findings were reported in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology. > > But Prof Hermon-, who has been supported by £940,000 in funding from the > Action Research charity for nearly 17 years and more recently by £670,000 from > the medical research council, is now looking at water supplies. > > He said research so far suggested that MAP had run off land into rivers, and > although much of it was removed by filtration, some might be evading > chlorination and getting into drinking water. If that was confirmed better > filtration, or ultra-violet treatments, might be needed. > > Action Research yesterday called for increased stringency in the pasteurisation > of milk, tests for MAP in dairy cattle and improved collection and storage > procedures on farms. > > It did not recommend that people stop drinking milk but suggested those with > Crohn's or relatives who may feel at risk should drink UHT supplies, where > higher pasteurisation temperatures were used. > > The food standards agency said the government was seeking to find ways in which > MAP might be killed by changes in pasteurisation. It believed precautionary > action to reduce human exposure to MAP should start now and not depend on a > link with disease in humans to be proved or disproved. > > The Department of Health said it welcomed any research which would increase > understanding of difficult and chronic diseases but could not comment further > at present. > > --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2003 Report Share Posted August 10, 2003 >Hi Folks, >Would like to know your thoughts on the following article. >Should we be concerned about this? Are our raw milk and meat >supplies tested for this organism? >TIA >-Vee I'm sure others will have other thoughts, but when I hear " infiltrating the pastuerization process " I think of botulism. Botulism doesn't infect much of anything IF there are competeing bacteria -- it is mainly a problem in things that are *almost* sterile. Kind of like Fireweed -- Fireweed only grows when nothing else does (like after a fire). Now, someone who is eating fermented foods and raw meat etc. is eating a LOT of competing bacteria. In general, the most competitive are the common ones we are all used to, and the crowd out the rare ones. So are we more at risk? Probably not. The people who are most at risk are the ones leading sterile lives, esp. if they have been on antibiotics, not eating probiotics, and eating mostly food that is well-cooked. Another analogy -- I drink kefir-beer, fermented on my counter in far less than sterile conditions, nightly. It is full of bacteria. Never had a problem. I've gotten food poisoning a few times though -- off what? Off *cooked* food -- food that was *mostly* sterile and therefore made a great growing spot for some odd germ that knocked me out. Which is not to say that some nasty bugs don't exist. They do. But the nastiest ones tend not to come from grass-fed cows, raw or otherwise. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2003 Report Share Posted August 11, 2003 Its very simple... Sick soil = Sick plants & grass = sick animals = sick humans Healthy soil = healthy plants & grass = healthy animals = healthy humans As long as we have sick soil (which we do) and the majority of the people are ignorant of the true problem, they will treat the symptoms, rather than the cause.... So, stay healthy, and don't get sick Problem solved, Chris _________________________________________________________________ ninemsn Extra Storage is now available. No account expiration - no need to worry about losing your Hotmail account. Click here http://join.msn.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2003 Report Share Posted August 11, 2003 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Bellanger " <chrisb05@...> > As long as we have sick soil (which we do) and the majority of the people > are ignorant of the true problem, they will treat the symptoms, rather than > the cause.... Soil quality is an issue, and an important one, but as long as people are not eating the best food that the soil has to offer, it will remain a secondary issue. Most of us here know from personal experience that it is possible to achieve significant health improvements through dietary changes even where soil quality remains constant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.