Guest guest Posted August 14, 2003 Report Share Posted August 14, 2003 In a message dated 8/14/03 2:01:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, slethnobotanist@... writes: > And I think in fact Albrecht, the great soil scientist, did in fact > demonstrate the point. But Dr. Albrecht is quite technical, and I have > to be in a certain frame of mind to read him since I am not a soil > scientist, otherwise I would go look for the relevant technical > abstracts. An agricultural library two towns over from me has his complete works, but I have to go there to read them. I have the rest of August off from school and work, so I might do just that, and take good notes. I've been anticipating reading them for some time now. I might buy Acres USA primer that Chi recommended first, so I can fully understand the material. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2003 Report Share Posted August 14, 2003 see comments below On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:07:10 EDT ChrisMasterjohn@... wrote: <snip> > Interestingly, the mushroom study found cultivated breeds of mushrooms to be > quite a bit higher in oxalates than wild breeds, and what's more, they > contained only soluble oxalates and no insoluble oxalates. Soluble oxalates are more > easily broken down. > > I don't know whether or not that can be said for crops in general-- that more > modern breeds have higher oxalate contents-- but if that can be extrapolated, > there's one more reason to throw on to the pile of why to eat heirloom/wild > breeds. But there is an apparent implication for agriculture-- Nitrate > fertilization lineraly increases oxalate levels! It most definitely can be said for crops in general, and it would appear, from Dr. Albrechts work, that it affects a lot more than oxalate content. Read the most neglected chapter in Price's NAPD, Food is Fabricated Soil Fertility, by Albrecht. It is an eye opener although not dealing specifically with the oxalate issue.. > > I don't know anything about soil science so I don't know if nitrates are > normally found in " natural fertizilers " or not (someone please fill me in here...) > but in any case, if the nitrogen source is ammonium rather than either > ammonium nitrate or straight nitrate, there is a linear *decrease* in oxalate > content versus a linear *increase* in oxalate content for the two nitrate-containing > sources. > > It seems the only hope for oxalate-reduction, from the studies I've looked at > *so far*, is fermenting. <snip> Awhile ago on this board someone commented that anti-nutrients decrease and are relatively insignificant when vegetation is grown in high fertility soil. The example he used was spinach. I think the combative exchange occurred between (Idol) and Chi <weg>, with Chi pointing out that anti-nutrients per se were not the issue, since their presence was dependent on the fertility of the soil. You might want to check the archives in reference to soil fertility but all that you write above would seem to support Chi's contention. And I think in fact Albrecht, the great soil scientist, did in fact demonstrate the point. But Dr. Albrecht is quite technical, and I have to be in a certain frame of mind to read him since I am not a soil scientist, otherwise I would go look for the relevant technical abstracts. I hope you will forgive me for my laziness :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.