Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Hmm but conversely, NHS tests always show negative, meaning no treatment is necessary. Wish I had been there, lol Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 How bizarre! We have just come back from our appointment with Gillian Baird in London and it was a complete waste of time. She was pro-ABA or pro-education, as she put it, which is a damn sight better than our paediatrician. As soon as we started talking diet and bio-medical she said there was no proof and no proper studies for any of that, she poo pooed DAN! and Shattock. She said it was neurological and genetic - end of story! When we saw she had made up her mind not to help us we didn't argue too vociferously (but we did argue) She talked a lot about pruning and head size and measured all our big heads but of course, offered no help. She said it is DEFINITELY NOT a medical or gut condition and the fact that loads of autistic kids have gut conditions - coincidence of course! Sara Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night Since we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on this list recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who did attend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip in!! Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about. According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good though to hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope they were taking notes! Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism. Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5- 2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation. Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a missed opportunity. Sharon DISCLAIMER No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified practitioner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 oh dear that doesn't sound very good (or very up to date!). On 24 May 2006, at 21:02, Sass and Rem wrote: > How bizarre! We have just come back from our appointment with Gillian > Baird > in London and it was a complete waste of time. She was pro-ABA or > pro-education, as she put it, which is a damn sight better than our > paediatrician. As soon as we started talking diet and bio-medical she > said > there was no proof and no proper studies for any of that, she poo > pooed DAN! > and Shattock. She said it was neurological and genetic - end of > story! > When we saw she had made up her mind not to help us we didn't argue > too > vociferously (but we did argue) > She talked a lot about pruning and head size and measured all our big > heads > but of course, offered no help. > She said it is DEFINITELY NOT a medical or gut condition and the fact > that > loads of autistic kids have gut conditions - coincidence of course! > Sara > > Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford > meeting > last night > > Since we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on this > list recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was > talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my > information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting > myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who did > attend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip > in!! > > Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring > paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about. > > According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is > definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There > are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic > children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. > I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up > her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good though > to hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that > autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope > they were taking notes! > > Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very > rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to > better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic > experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise > in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism. > > Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5- > 2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could > be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to > quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be > environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the > favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox > problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. > > So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She > highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting > big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird > said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at > the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper > study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin > doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation. > > Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a > missed opportunity. > > Sharon > > > >  > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER > No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical > advice. > If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified > practitioner. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Forgot to say, she also said that privately done tests are not to be trusted as they will ALWAYS show results that mean treatment – presumably, she meant, because someone can make money out of it (we told her that Tom had just had a krypto pyrroles test and tested as fine but she didn’t answer). I asked ‘do you think they just make the results up?’ and she said ‘no, they read them differently.’ In other words, nothing will EVER convince her. SARA Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night Since we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on this list recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who did attend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip in!! Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about. According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good though to hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope they were taking notes! Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism. Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5- 2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation. Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a missed opportunity. Sharon DISCLAIMER No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified practitioner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 I know a number of people who have had negative results from the ARU. And Archie's last urine test we had done for IWDL was near normal (way more normal than I expected it to be anyway). On 24 May 2006, at 23:00, Sass and Rem wrote: > Forgot to say, she also said that privately done tests are not to be > trusted as they will ALWAYS show results that mean treatment – > presumably, she meant, because someone can make money out of it (we > told her that Tom had just had a krypto pyrroles test and tested as > fine but she didn’t answer). I asked ‘do you think they just make the > results up?’ and she said ‘no, they read them differently.’ > In other words, nothing will EVER convince her. > SARA >  > Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford > meeting > last night > > Since we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on this > list recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was > talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my > information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting > myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who did > attend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip > in!! > > Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring > paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about. > > According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is > definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There > are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic > children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. > I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up > her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good though > to hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that > autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope > they were taking notes! > > Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very > rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to > better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic > experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise > in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism. > > Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5- > 2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could > be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to > quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be > environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the > favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox > problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. > > So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She > highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting > big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird > said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at > the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper > study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin > doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation. > > Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a > missed opportunity. > > Sharon > > > >  > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER > No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical > advice. > If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified > practitioner. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2006 Report Share Posted May 24, 2006 Me too. Wish there had been an army of us there. J Re: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night Hmm but conversely, NHS tests always show negative, meaning no treatment is necessary. Wish I had been there, lol Vicky -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/347 - Release Date: 24/05/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/347 - Release Date: 24/05/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 What a pratt. These " expert doctors " drive me crazy. I feel so annoyed/frustrated with these people that I don't think I would be able to trust myself to be civil if left alone with one for any length of time. Miles. Sass and Rem wrote: > How bizarre! We have just come back from our appointment with Gillian Baird > in London and it was a complete waste of time. She was pro-ABA or > pro-education, as she put it, which is a damn sight better than our > paediatrician. As soon as we started talking diet and bio-medical she said > there was no proof and no proper studies for any of that, she poo pooed DAN! > and Shattock. She said it was neurological and genetic - end of story! > When we saw she had made up her mind not to help us we didn't argue too > vociferously (but we did argue) > She talked a lot about pruning and head size and measured all our big heads > but of course, offered no help. > She said it is DEFINITELY NOT a medical or gut condition and the fact that > loads of autistic kids have gut conditions - coincidence of course! > Sara > > Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting > last night > > Since we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on this > list recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was > talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my > information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting > myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who did > attend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip > in!! > > Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring > paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about. > > According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is > definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There > are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic > children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. > I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up > her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good though > to hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that > autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope > they were taking notes! > > Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very > rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to > better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic > experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise > in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism. > > Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5- > 2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could > be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to > quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be > environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the > favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox > problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. > > So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She > highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting > big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird > said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at > the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper > study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin > doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation. > > Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a > missed opportunity. > > Sharon > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER > No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. > If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified > practitioner. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Bizzare indeed. I will have to quiz my sources on how they could have possibly got it all so badly wrong! I hope my originial post (below) didn't mislead anyone. I was seriously hopeful for a moment that we were seeing some kind of a mainstream breakthrough - an acceptace that autism presents is a medical condition and should therefore be amenable to treatment. From what you say it doesn't sound like that was her opinion at all. Sharon > > How bizarre! We have just come back from our appointment with Gillian Baird > in London and it was a complete waste of time. She was pro-ABA or > pro-education, as she put it, which is a damn sight better than our > paediatrician. As soon as we started talking diet and bio-medical she said > there was no proof and no proper studies for any of that, she poo pooed DAN! > and Shattock. She said it was neurological and genetic - end of story! > When we saw she had made up her mind not to help us we didn't argue too > vociferously (but we did argue) > She talked a lot about pruning and head size and measured all our big heads > but of course, offered no help. > She said it is DEFINITELY NOT a medical or gut condition and the fact that > loads of autistic kids have gut conditions - coincidence of course! > Sara > > Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting > last night > > Since we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on this > list recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was > talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my > information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting > myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who did > attend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip > in!! > > Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring > paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about. > > According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is > definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There > are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic > children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. > I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up > her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good though > to hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that > autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope > they were taking notes! > > Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very > rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to > better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic > experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise > in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism. > > Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5- > 2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could > be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to > quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be > environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the > favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox > problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. > > So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She > highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting > big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird > said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at > the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper > study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin > doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation. > > Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a > missed opportunity. > > Sharon > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER > No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. > If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified > practitioner. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 I've had this said to me before! How do IWDL make money out of an abnormal CDSA or Organix or Thyroid test?? Shares in probios? My dd had an abnormal free T3 from IWDL; 9.5, so her paediatrician repeated it and it was suddenly down to 6.3, therefore 'within range' so no problems with it. Of course it must have been the NHS one that was correct! Diane RE: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night Forgot to say, she also said that privately done tests are not to be trusted as they will ALWAYS show results that mean treatment – presumably, she meant, because someone can make money out of it (we told her that Tom had just had a krypto pyrroles test and tested as fine but she didn’t answer). I asked ‘do you think they just make the results up?’ and she said ‘no, they read them differently.’ In other words, nothing will EVER convince her. SARA -----Original Message-----From: Autism Treatment [mailto:Autism Treatment ] On Behalf Of Christianne PollockSent: 24 May 2006 21:34Autism Treatment Subject: Re: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night oh dear that doesn't sound very good (or very up to date!). On 24 May 2006, at 21:02, Sass and Rem wrote: How bizarre! We have just come back from our appointment with Gillian Bairdin London and it was a complete waste of time. She was pro-ABA orpro-education, as she put it, which is a damn sight better than ourpaediatrician. As soon as we started talking diet and bio-medical she saidthere was no proof and no proper studies for any of that, she poo pooed DAN!and Shattock. She said it was neurological and genetic - end of story!When we saw she had made up her mind not to help us we didn't argue toovociferously (but we did argue)She talked a lot about pruning and head size and measured all our big headsbut of course, offered no help.She said it is DEFINITELY NOT a medical or gut condition and the fact thatloads of autistic kids have gut conditions - coincidence of course!Sara-----Original Message-----From: Autism Treatment [mailto:Autism Treatment ] On Behalf Of sharon_asd_ukSent: 24 May 2006 19:06Autism Treatment Subject: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meetinglast nightSince we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on thislist recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who didattend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip in!!Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about.According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good thoughto hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope they were taking notes!Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism.Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5-2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation.Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a missed opportunity.Sharon DISCLAIMERNo information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice.If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualifiedpractitioner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 I've had this said to me before! How do IWDL make money out of an abnormal CDSA or Organix or Thyroid test?? Shares in probios? My dd had an abnormal free T3 from IWDL; 9.5, so her paediatrician repeated it and it was suddenly down to 6.3, therefore 'within range' so no problems with it. Of course it must have been the NHS one that was correct! Diane RE: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night Forgot to say, she also said that privately done tests are not to be trusted as they will ALWAYS show results that mean treatment – presumably, she meant, because someone can make money out of it (we told her that Tom had just had a krypto pyrroles test and tested as fine but she didn’t answer). I asked ‘do you think they just make the results up?’ and she said ‘no, they read them differently.’ In other words, nothing will EVER convince her. SARA -----Original Message-----From: Autism Treatment [mailto:Autism Treatment ] On Behalf Of Christianne PollockSent: 24 May 2006 21:34Autism Treatment Subject: Re: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meeting last night oh dear that doesn't sound very good (or very up to date!). On 24 May 2006, at 21:02, Sass and Rem wrote: How bizarre! We have just come back from our appointment with Gillian Bairdin London and it was a complete waste of time. She was pro-ABA orpro-education, as she put it, which is a damn sight better than ourpaediatrician. As soon as we started talking diet and bio-medical she saidthere was no proof and no proper studies for any of that, she poo pooed DAN!and Shattock. She said it was neurological and genetic - end of story!When we saw she had made up her mind not to help us we didn't argue toovociferously (but we did argue)She talked a lot about pruning and head size and measured all our big headsbut of course, offered no help.She said it is DEFINITELY NOT a medical or gut condition and the fact thatloads of autistic kids have gut conditions - coincidence of course!Sara-----Original Message-----From: Autism Treatment [mailto:Autism Treatment ] On Behalf Of sharon_asd_ukSent: 24 May 2006 19:06Autism Treatment Subject: Dr Gillian Baird - Guildford meetinglast nightSince we've been discussing the paediatrican Dr Gillian Baird on thislist recently, I thought some of you might like to hear what she was talking about at a Surrey NAS meeting last night. WARNING - my information is SECOND HAND as I wasn't able to get to the meeting myself, but have heavily quizzed two mums at gym just now who didattend. If anyone else on this list was actually there please chip in!!Dr Gillian Baird came over to my friends as an open minded and caring paediatrican who seemed to really know what she was talking about.According to my sources, Dr Baird said in the meeting that autism is definately a real medical condition, a neurological condition. There are marked differences in the brains of autistic vs non-autistic children. She talked about pruning of the brain cells being faulty. I'm told she presented lots of research studies and graphs to back up her arguments (my sources couldn't follow these). It is good thoughto hear someone as well respected as her in the mainstream say that autism is a medical condition out loud at an NAS meeting. I hope they were taking notes!Dr Baird also said very clearly that autism is definately rising very rapidly over recent years and that the rise can NOT be put down to better diagnosis alone (she is one of the UK's formost diagnostic experts herself so coming from her this is very good). The big rise in autism is in the sub-set of regressive, late onset autism.Why the rise in autism? Something triggering it at around 1.5-2years. But this doesn't have to be an external trigger (??) Could be because of the genetic suseptability. (I wish I'd been there to quiz her more fully about genentic epidemics.... ) Could be environmental trigger too, but from what I was told this was not the favoured explaination. No mention of mercury, toxic load, detox problems, methylation issues etc etc etc. So what about medical treatment? Not much of substance here. She highlighted the lack of research studies and the difficulties getting big enough samples to get statistically signifcant results. Dr Baird said they'd tried to get a controlled study off the ground to look at the gfcf diet but couldn't get funding (!). Until there is a proper study the jury remains out. My friend thinks she said secretin doesn't work. Gut issues were focused around constipation.Please do add or correct this if you were there. Wish I had been - a missed opportunity.Sharon DISCLAIMERNo information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice.If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualifiedpractitioner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.