Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 I ran a mates test by Andy Cutler when it first came out. He said it was valid - for identifying Mercury toxicity ONLY. That the other ones reported are ambiguous and the test gives no indication of the LEVEL of toxicity. Still I thought quite useful. Then I chat to another mum who reports that a chap who came back negative for Hg, who later took ALA, when test was reperated he was off the page with Hg..............................Hmmmmmmmmm. Yeah well I always thought the ALA worked but??? what use is this test I ask myself now if a toxic person can be reported as negative. The hair test isn't foolproof but its looking a lot more useful and cheaper from where I am sitting right now. I was hoping we would be able to use this non invasive easy test to prove our kids were toxic in an informal study.....................hmmmmmmmmmm again. So then s results, I think he is doign TD DMPS, so I would interpret that as most likely body stores are down. Go with the ALA on 3 hourly protocol and repeat that test and se what comes back. I plan to play with this test when I have the funding. Trouble is we use ALA already and I'm not prepared to stop that for 3-4 months to prove my point while negativelty affecting my sons treatment. So anybody not doen ALA and does have low/negative results want to test this out? This is my perosnal opinion BTW Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.