Homozone -Vs- Direct Oxygen

May 6, 2001

Dear Green,

Your post on body use of 03 and 02 most educational and this must explain why

03 has so much therapeutic value for most of the difficult to treat

illnesses.

May 6, 2001

Now, Vilik, this is the first time I've had the opportunity to respond to

you -- and I'm not finding fault, I'm just attempting to verify your

advice, and I'm curious about what you've said. You see, my lady is a

Registered Nurse and, in Hospital, they put a little instrument on the end

of the finger which reads the blood oxygen. If the Doctor orders oxygen,

they take the little clear tube coming from the medical grade oxygen supply

on the wall and place it into the patient's nose and regulate the flow of

oxygen with a knob on the flow valve. After several hours, they check the

B/O and, if it's okay, they then take the tube away. Also, when they have

an unborn baby in oxygen distress, they turn the flow way up high. The Mom

gets the maximun amount and the baby really benefits. They verify this by

checking the fetal monitor to see the heartbeat as it comes back up. Now, I

wish you'd go back to your people with this info and verify what you were

told so we can get the really straight scoop on this part of my question,

please, because this answer is really important to me. Obie.

Homozone -Vs- Direct Oxygen

>

> " OBIE " <obie2@...> wrote:

>

> I've been reading the details at homozon.ebz.com and came to wonder if

just

> plain oxygen from a tank and into the nose through those little clear

tubes

> at night as we sleep wouldn't be just as effective as Homozon; maybe more.

> It sure wouldn't have the side effects; in fact, has no side effects, I

> don't believe. I think the same could be said for Ozone, probably.

Obie.

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~

> Oh Obie...I think I actually may be able to answer this one!

>

> Just plain O2 breathed in from a canister actually LOWERS blood oxygen.

> Ray Peat first told me this a few years ago, and I just interestingly

> enought got an email from someone who had that experience, which

> confirms it.

>

> Ozone therapy and homozone work with O3...and it is that extra number

> that does the work.

>

> Hope this helps...

>

> ~^^V^^~

>

> OxyPLUS is an unmoderated e-ring dealing with oxidative therapies, and

other alternative self-help subjects.

>

> THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!

>

> This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find here

are for information and research purposes only. We are people sharing

information we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so at your

own risk. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to

take responsibility for your own actions. By joining the list you agree to

hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not use any ideas found

here without consulting a medical professional, unless you are a researcher

or health care provider.

>

> You can unsubscribe via e-mail by sending A NEW e-mail to the following

address - NOT TO THE OXYPLUS LIST! -

> DO NOT USE REPLY BUTTON & DO NOT PUT THIS IN THE SUBJECT LINE or BODY of

the message! :

>

> oxyplus-unsubscribeegroups

>

> oxyplus-normalonelist - switch your subscription to normal mode.

>

May 6, 2001

" OBIE " <obie2@...> wrote:

I've been reading the details at homozon.ebz.com and came to wonder if just

plain oxygen from a tank and into the nose through those little clear tubes

at night as we sleep wouldn't be just as effective as Homozon; maybe more.

It sure wouldn't have the side effects; in fact, has no side effects, I

don't believe. I think the same could be said for Ozone, probably. Obie.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh Obie...I think I actually may be able to answer this one!

Just plain O2 breathed in from a canister actually LOWERS blood oxygen.

Ray Peat first told me this a few years ago, and I just interestingly

enought got an email from someone who had that experience, which

confirms it.

Ozone therapy and homozone work with O3...and it is that extra number

that does the work.

Hope this helps...

~^^V^^~

May 6, 2001

Obie, Vilik and All,

About the relative effctiveness of ozone (O3) and oxygen (O2) for

therapeutic purposes:

It's my understanding through several years of association with

Dr. Freibott (a recognized world authority on oxidative chemistry

and oxygen therapy), that O1 (singlet oxygen) is the only form of

oxygen that the body uses, and that the body must convert

atmospheric oxygen from O2 to O1 at the cellular level before the

oxygen is used in the body's metabolism, and that this process

consumes energy and constitutes a limiting factor on oxygen

availability to the body.

Ozone (O3, or O2O) provides the body with a source of oxygen

which is already in the form the body uses, and doesn't require

the body to expend energy to convert it to that form.

Therefore, products which provide oxygen to the body in that form

are more effective than atmospheric oxygen (O2) at enabling the

body to heal from conditions brought about through impairment

of oxygen availability or metabolism, which, it seems, is most

ailments -- it is hard to find any health impairment which isn't

benefiicially treated by oxygen therapy -- a truly wide-spectrum

therapy with almost nonexistent harmful side effects.

So, the reason nascent or singlet oxygen, which is what you're

getting with ozone, is so much more effective therapeutically than

atmospheric oxygen is -- either breathed from the atmosphere

or from an oxygen concentrator or medical oxygen tank -- is that

it isn't subjected to the limitation of having to be converted by the

body from O2 to O1 in order to be used in the body's metabolism.

A dose of Homozon, say, loads the blood right up with ready-made

O1, whereas breathing medical oxygen all night, while beneficial,

never achieves the same levels of O1 availability to the body's cells.

Green

~^~^~^~^

OBIE wrote: