Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Hiya I will forward it to you again. Lets know if you get it. Caroline x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 WILL FORWARD IT TO U TOO. CAROLINE X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Where I live all the parents doing ABA have had to fund it themselves for the first year in order to prove it's effectiveness against standard LEA provision, with their child, same with sonrise, I don't know of any who have had funding from scratch. I think the legal stand on this for LEA's is that they are only required to provide an "adequate" provision and the onus is on parents to prove the provision is not "adequate". The people I know also have to prove ABA year on year in order to continue the funding, shame the same isn't done with LEA provision. Even something small like SLT has to be proven to be inadequate in my LEA, requiring independent assesments and possibly solicitors. Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 I think there are several things that need to be done: the major ABA providers perhaps should ask to see the raw data and reanalyse the findings. LEAP, perhaps might do this? The numbers are all quite small and one or two ABA programmes hitting trouble or not being of adequate quality (inexperienced supervisor?) could have skewed the results. The two measurements were only 9 months apart. An ABA programme runs for several years. There has been no long-term follow-up. They say the children were all well-matched, but the help they got depended on where they lived: ie if there was a special needs nursery nearby, they went there. We all know that socio-economic conditions of families can vary widely within quite small areas. It's not good enough to say "They all lived in the South-East and so were the same!" The paper has not been peer-reviewed. What is the track record of the researchers? Just some thoughts. Margaret FW: ABA report from the LEA Hello knowledgeable people.Attached is a report the LEA have just sent to me. they say that thisreport is the reason they are not going to fund ABA. Thought others may liketo see it in case your LEAS also use it but I would also REALLY reallyreally appreciate any comments, ie saying it's a load of rubbish and ABA isgood.Thanks, SARA-- No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 __________ NOD32 1.1441 (20060313) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Hi, where is the report, i would very much like to read it!!! thanks > > > > Hello knowledgeable people. > Attached is a report the LEA have just sent to me. they say that this > report is the reason they are not going to fund ABA. Thought others may like > to see it in case your LEAS also use it but I would also REALLY really > really appreciate any comments, ie saying it's a load of rubbish and ABA is > good. > Thanks, SARA > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Also, perhaps send it to Prof. Geraldine Dawson at the University of Washington at Seattle. Margaret Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 I agree - we are at tribunal next month, would love to read this report but cannot find any attachment. Sass & Rem couly you email it to me direct please? I will forward to my ABA consultant and post back his comments. Thanks Gail > > > > > > > > Hello knowledgeable people. > > Attached is a report the LEA have just sent to me. they say that > this > > report is the reason they are not going to fund ABA. Thought > others may like > > to see it in case your LEAS also use it but I would also REALLY > really > > really appreciate any comments, ie saying it's a load of rubbish > and ABA is > > good. > > Thanks, SARA > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: > 13/03/2006 > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: > 13/03/2006 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Sorry I'm trying again. I wrote to you off line but had no idea how to send an attachment that way. IT expert of the week! Sara Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA I agree - we are at tribunal next month, would love to read this report but cannot find any attachment. Sass & Rem couly you email it to me direct please? I will forward to my ABA consultant and post back his comments. Thanks Gail > > > > > > > > Hello knowledgeable people. > > Attached is a report the LEA have just sent to me. they say that > this > > report is the reason they are not going to fund ABA. Thought > others may like > > to see it in case your LEAS also use it but I would also REALLY > really > > really appreciate any comments, ie saying it's a load of rubbish > and ABA is > > good. > > Thanks, SARA > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: > 13/03/2006 > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: > 13/03/2006 > > > DISCLAIMER No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified practitioner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Wow, sounds impressive! Thanks Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA I think there are several things that need to be done: the major ABA providers perhaps should ask to see the raw data and reanalyse the findings. LEAP, perhaps might do this? The numbers are all quite small and one or two ABA programmes hitting trouble or not being of adequate quality (inexperienced supervisor?) could have skewed the results. The two measurements were only 9 months apart. An ABA programme runs for several years. There has been no long-term follow-up. They say the children were all well-matched, but the help they got depended on where they lived: ie if there was a special needs nursery nearby, they went there. We all know that socio-economic conditions of families can vary widely within quite small areas. It's not good enough to say " They all lived in the South-East and so were the same! " The paper has not been peer-reviewed. What is the track record of the researchers? Just some thoughts. Margaret FW: ABA report from the LEA Hello knowledgeable people. Attached is a report the LEA have just sent to me. they say that this report is the reason they are not going to fund ABA. Thought others may like to see it in case your LEAS also use it but I would also REALLY really really appreciate any comments, ie saying it's a load of rubbish and ABA is good. Thanks, SARA -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 __________ NOD32 1.1441 (20060313) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Yes, we are funding it and have been funding it for 7 and a half months. We expect to go to tribunal in September ish so that will be over a year of funding. It’s just that we had a meeting with the LEA recently and they said that the reason they weren’t going to fund it was because of this report. A tast of things to come in the tribunal, I think. SARA Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Where I live all the parents doing ABA have had to fund it themselves for the first year in order to prove it's effectiveness against standard LEA provision, with their child, same with sonrise, I don't know of any who have had funding from scratch. I think the legal stand on this for LEA's is that they are only required to provide an " adequate " provision and the onus is on parents to prove the provision is not " adequate " . The people I know also have to prove ABA year on year in order to continue the funding, shame the same isn't done with LEA provision. Even something small like SLT has to be proven to be inadequate in my LEA, requiring independent assesments and possibly solicitors. Vicky -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 The LEA don't have to make "best provision", merely adequate (see IPSEA website for case law). So you have to show what they're offering is inadequate. I just posted to UK SpecialNeeds that I had found a stock of the now unavailable title "Taking Action" by and Ruebain. I really recommend it for anything to do with Statements -it's aimed at parents who don't have a lawyer. The 11 remaining copies are available from the RNIB, either on-line or by phone and cost £16.95 each including delivery. A second-hand copy is for sale on Amazon for £39..... obviously, I'm not a businesswoman! It doesn't deal with Tribunal matters. IPSEA have a publication by Sally Capper called "SENT Ahead" which is some help. It doesn't warn you about the LEA lying on the day, though, nor teach you how to cross-examine them........ Margaret Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky__________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 This is all really useful stuff, it all seems very daunting and impossible to me. there’s no way we can afford a lawyer but my sister is a lawyer (and doesn’t have a clue about autism or ABA) and we’re hoping to use her. I’ll look for that book. Thanks a lot. Sara. Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Yes, I know, I was just paying attention to a detail – that’s all. We tried to get out of them some of the arguments they would be using and this is just one of them. I know that if we can show ABA works that counts for more than the report. We can’t afford a solicitor although we have told them we’ll be getting one. I’ve already written this in another email but my sister’s a lawyer although not at all specialist in this area and we’ll be using her. Sara Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 You can download or order free a hard copy of the SEN Code of Practice 2001 and the SEN Toolkit - essential. (try via the DfES website or teachernet.) Also the Education Act 1996 is downloadable free (about £38 to buy a paper copy). Some very useful summaries of the law on the IPSEA website, plus useful links. Your sister should have on-line access to case law via her work with any luck. The standard looseleaf work on education law (Cherie Booth one of the authors) costs £130 per annum. Margaret Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com --No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/teachinginengland/detail.cfm?id=401 useful links to publications. Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com --No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Hi again Margaret, bit of a delayed reaction to this message! I would love to find the book you mention below ‘taking action’ but can’t find it anywhere. How do you get stuff from the RNIB – it’s not on Amazon at all now. Sara (or anyone else out there. Do you have a copy of this book for sale?) The LEA don't have to make " best provision " , merely adequate (see IPSEA website for case law). So you have to show what they're offering is inadequate. I just posted to UK SpecialNeeds that I had found a stock of the now unavailable title " Taking Action " by and Ruebain. I really recommend it for anything to do with Statements -it's aimed at parents who don't have a lawyer. The 11 remaining copies are available from the RNIB, either on-line or by phone and cost £16.95 each including delivery. A second-hand copy is for sale on Amazon for £39..... obviously, I'm not a businesswoman! It doesn't deal with Tribunal matters. IPSEA have a publication by Sally Capper called " SENT Ahead " which is some help. It doesn't warn you about the LEA lying on the day, though, nor teach you how to cross-examine them........ Margaret ----- Original Message ----- From: MaddiganV@... Autism Treatment Cc: MaddiganV@... Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 2:39 PM Subject: Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 17/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 24/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 17/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 24/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 http://onlineshop.rnib.org.uk/display_item.asp?n=11 & c=450 & sc=27 & id=604 & it=2 & l=3 I hope they've still got one left. M. Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com __________ NOD32 1.1461 (20060329) Information __________This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com --No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 --No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 17/03/2006 --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 24/03/2006 --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 --No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Margaret, thanks a million for that. I have no idea why I couldn’t find it by myself – wasted an entire morning looking. Thanks again. Sara x Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA http://onlineshop.rnib.org.uk/display_item.asp?n=11 & c=450 & sc=27 & id=604 & it=2 & l=3 I hope they've still got one left. M. Re: FW: ABA report from the LEA Yes but surely this is an individual case, and so long as you can prove this is the best provision for your child, the reports would be secondary. Are you using a solicitor? We have virtually always had to have a solicitor on board, in the past they have caved in immediately, but I am seriously short of funds and trying to appeal my sons statement without this expense and not doing very well. Anyway, good luck Vicky __________ NOD32 1.1442 (20060314) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com __________ NOD32 1.1461 (20060329) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 13/03/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 17/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 24/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.