Guest guest Posted July 8, 2005 Report Share Posted July 8, 2005 Biomechanics July 2005 www.biomech.com Practitioners overcome dearth of foot orthoses data By: Andria Segedy Foot orthoses can't get no respect. Though prefabs are the first-line self-medication solution for many people and custom orthoses are prescribed with great frequency, hard data about their efficacy are scarce. Practitioners are finding ways to overcome that problem. Stuart Pressman, CO, CPed, was frustrated with the limited solutions he saw to problems of the foot. Working within a pharmacy/medical supply business as Pressman Orthotics, the certified orthotist found more and more people had foot problems and nobody had the answers. His response was to become a certified pedorthist and to open Sole- lutions Footwear in Pembroke Pines, FL. In 1995 Pressman returned to school to study pedorthics and to better understand the biomechanics of the foot in order to come up with solutions for his patients' foot problems. Four years ago he opened Sole-lutions, where today 70% of his patients are from physician and physical therapist referrals. The rest are walk-ins to his 1400- square-foot retail store. He markets his business by direct mail to and direct contact with those referral sources. " When you become an orthotist, you learn something about the foot, but not anywhere near the extensive detail you do going to school for pedorthics, " Pressman said. " I learned the details of how the foot affects the rest of the body. It's almost like an internist becoming a specialist. " He also pores over industry journals for new ideas and products and attends professional conventions. Sole-lutions' patients have a range of issues, from diabetes to arthritis to pain. The number one foot problem Pressman sees, though, is plantar fasciitis, followed by metatarsalgia. " A lot of people are hooked on their beautiful shoes that are the wrong size and fit, and they eventually will be in to see me, " Pressman said. Pressman said Sole-lutions sells three kinds of inserts. In stock at all times are 30 to 40 varieties of over-the-counter inserts, priced from $12 to $65, made by different companies. Full custom-molded insoles, accommodative or corrective, cost $300, although other businesses charge as much as $450, he said. Semicustom insoles allow him to piece together components to match a foot. He sells these inserts for $90 to $150. The basis for a particular choice is patient need, Pressman said, while the pricing differences also give some consumers options based on economics. Pressman said he starts with the lowest priced solution he thinks will work. One of the meetings Pressman attends is the Pedorthic Footwear Association's annual symposium, where last year he learned about X- Static, an antimicrobial, silver-based material he now uses in orthotic inserts he fabricates and in socks he sells (see " Precious Metal: Foot care takes a shine to silver, " February, page 26). While X-Static is an exception, for the most part Pressman finds that few of the new materials or products on the market are appreciably better than what he already uses. He also notes that some of the newer products do not work as well with other pieces of the finished insert. " I'm used to the old materials, the ones I have had proven success with, " he said. " This new material (X-Static) works well with what I already use. " He misses Recoil, a heat-conformable urethane, taken off the market a few years ago. " It was an excellent material, " Pressman said. " I don't know why they stopped manufacturing it. It was good for patients with diabetes, good for patients with arthritis. Its shock absorbency came from a sponge-like material with the ability to rebound. It was heat- moldable and glueable. It worked great. " He's also able to weave his newest find into custom-molded inserts. The X-Static material helps kill odor and bacteria and prevent infections to the foot, Pressman said. The material is available in socks and Acor shoes for diabetic patients-silver's antimicrobial properties help discourage infection in diabetic wounds-and in socks and inserts he sells mostly to athletes. Athletic shoe manufacturers are jumping in, too. Sports will start using X-Static in its running shoes next season, he said. " I've used the X-Static mostly with athletes who have sweaty feet and issues with odor, " Pressman said. The patient-athlete also is more willing to pay the higher price of a product made with X-Static, Pressman said, adding that he charges an additional $20 per pair to use the X-Static material in custom orthoses. Unlike products and materials, insurance reimbursement challenges haven't changed with time, Pressman said. He does accept assignments for patients under Medicare's Therapeutic Shoe Bill, but not other insurance plans. " Generally, orthotic inserts are not covered or there is a question mark on an individual insurance plan, so I won't accept insurance. But we will do the billing for the patients, " he said. Illinois outcomes The lower limb and foot patients at Springfield Clinic and its Diabetic Foot Clinic in central Illinois usually find themselves subjects of research conducted by staff orthotist Geza F. Kogler, PhD, CO. The aim of his current study is to determine how the clinic compares to national statistics in diabetic patient outcomes and what can be done to better educate patients with diabetes who might face limb amputation, Kogler said. Along with the potential for better clinical results, Kogler said, research can make a difference to payers, giving an example from the late 1990s. " There is one orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon in central Illinois, " Kogler said. " He knew the only way his patients could be treated for plantar fasciitis was to send them to me and have me prescribe a custom foot orthosis I designed based on my 1996 biomechanical study. " 1 At the time, none of the area insurance carriers would reimburse for the device, Kogler said. The surgeon and Kogler began documenting the cost of the surgeon treating the case-including x-rays, multiple office visits, injections, and physical therapy-versus the cost of the orthoses from Kogler. The cost of the surgeon treating the case was alarming, Kogler said, although he could not recall specific figures. At the time, the cost of the orthoses was $250 to $300. Health Alliance (based in Urbana, IL) is still one of the only carriers to cover this device, he said. Health Alliance's decision was based on Kogler's paper and the financial data comparison he and the surgeon provided. " We had a solution that was reliable and predictable, " Kogler said. " But I can't take it up as one of my second jobs to go to each provider. " Reimbursed or not, Kogler has done enough research that he believes his devices help improve foot function for his customers. He doesn't stock any prefabricated devices. " Almost all of the orthoses I prescribe and fit are custom-molded and fabricated, " Kogler said. " The design configuration of most of my foot orthoses is based on biomechanical research studies I have conducted. " Working at a diabetic foot clinic means Kogler sees a lot of pressure sores. " Orthotists dealing with diabetic foot-related problems are essentially 'pressure managers' for the feet, " he said. " Their success depends on a solid understanding of foot biomechanics that allows them to properly design an orthosis. " An appreciation for the mechanisms responsible for wound healing as it relates to diabetes and the vascular-deficient limb are also important. " The medial longitudinal arch has the potential to reduce pressure to the first metatarsal head and the medial heel an average of 28% compared to a flat insole, " Kogler said. " A metatarsal support and a concave relief for metatarsals also have significant pressure- relieving capabilities for the metatarsals. " His research has focused on medial longitudinal arch supports and wedges, which he thinks may be of benefit, though there is little data yet to support his clinical observations. " According to our hypothesis, orthoses that are effective as arch supports would reduce tension within the plantar aponeurosis, " Kogler said. As part of a cadaver study, he designed a biomechanical test to evaluate arch support mechanisms by measuring the strain within the plantar fascia via an implanted strain transducer.1 His team of investigators evaluated six different types of arch supports. " Though a couple were effective as arch supports, you can't call all of the devices tested arch supports because they are not changing the tension within the plantar aponeurosis, " he said. An arch support acts like a truss, Kogler said. " We defined an arch support as a structure that supports the skeletal arch, not just the soft tissue, and displays a quantifiable reduction in tension in the plantar fascia, " Kogler said. A definition accepted by the orthopedic, podiatric, and other footwear medical specialties, this was one that could be demonstrated biomechanically. " Most over-the-counter foot orthoses just compress soft tissue and do not support the arch, as they claim, " He said. Kogler did a similar study,2 also cadaveric, on the influence of medial and lateral orthotic wedges on foot function. Results showed that a wedge under the lateral aspect of the forefoot decreased strain on the plantar aponeurosis and a wedge under the medial aspect increased the strain (see table). Shape and function On the Northwest coast, researchers at the Veteran Administration's Center for Excellence in Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering in Seattle are studying the effects of foot shape on foot function. Results could provide the practitioner community with documented information on how foot structure affects function, according to principal investigator and research health scientist Ledoux, PhD. Existing studies on foot shape and function often have a subjective component,3 Ledoux said. His research in Seattle is objective. " One thing we are interested in is how the shape of the foot relates to diabetic ulceration. We've come up with an objective, three- dimensional way of quantifying the foot shape based on computed tomography scans of a person's foot, " Ledoux said.4 To relate the shape of the foot to the plantar pressure it produces, he's also measuring plantar pressure with an emed pressure plate. Weight-bearing CT scans were taken of 40 feet from 40 subjects: 10 each pes planus (flat) feet with and without pain, 10 neutrally aligned feet, and 10 pes cavus (high-arch) feet. " We're exploring whether the shape of the talus is different in people who have painful flat feet and pain in their arches, " Ledoux said. " This is unrelated to diabetic foot ulceration. However, diabetic foot ulceration could also be related to the shape of a person's foot. " Andria Segedy is a contributing editor to BioMechanics. References 1. Kogler GF, idis SE, JP. Biomechanics of longitudinal arch support mechanisms in foot orthoses and their effect on plantar aponeurosis strain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 1996;11(5):243-252. 2. Kogler GF, Veer FB, idis SE, JP. The influence of medial and lateral placement of orthotic wedges on loading of the plantar aponeurosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1999;81-A(10): 1403-1413. 3. Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture. 2002 Jun;15(3):282-291. 4. Camacho DL, Ledoux WR, Rohr ES, et al. A three-dimensional, anatomically detailed foot model: a foundation for a finite element simulation and means of quantifying foot-bone position. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39(3):401-410. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.