Guest guest Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 Thanks Jane, that was very well said. it's so easy to throw stones, and yet so many farmers that I know are on a continuum of changing the paradigm and all they need is support, not criticism and negativity. They quite ofen know where they want to end up but just need the help and support to get there. Much of the new blood being pumped into farming these days is coming from CONSUMERS. Once the clear call goes out for a product, be it raw milk, 100% grass-fed meat or organic, the market will rise to meet the need. This is the most exciting thing in farming these days. America has more people in prison than we have farmers. The average age of the American farmer has risen to 58 and it's going up. We need to keep the support up for NEW farmers, the new paradigm and the new willingness to financially support this new breed of farmer. Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2007 Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 If the farmer you mentioned, who's had trouble with the dept of agriculture, is the one I think he is- a personal friend of mine, in fact- he has never been mentioned by name on this site, so I don't think this site has been a source of trouble for him. Emilie > > In light of what happened in regard to Sweetland Farm, lots of feelings emerge in situations like that because people know each other, do business with each other and develop relationships. I don't want to beat a dead horse but I don't think this is a dead horse. It HAS happened before but when it happened, it was about farmers most of you do not know so there was no emotional response, except for me. When it was suggested that one of our farmers was using Round Up and that she should not have been invited to the swap, I became very emotional because I knew she did not use Round Up and although I was not the one who invited her to the swap, I felt she had every right to come. I worried that somebody would make her feel unwelcomed or make her feel bad in some way. I also worried that she probably would not sell much after that (and in her opinion, she didn't). Another farmer also was criticized on this site for not having his cows 100% grass fed. This farmer was told by the Department of Agriculture to stop selling raw milk but he told me he was going to continue anyway because too many people were telling him that they were getting well with his milk. > It may be a good idea for us to agree not to talk about any negative ideas, practices, or what may have happened with farmers on this site. It should be up to the individual consumer to ask the farmer what he/she feeds the animals or any other questions they may have. If problems arise, perhaps the best way to resolve it is directly with the farmer, not in a group of over 500 people. Or, perhaps an individual may want to send a personal e-mail to somebody and ask questions. That way, over 500 people will not get the wrong impression. I know you are probably all tired of hearing about this, but we will not resolve a problem by denying it exists or by saying it has never happened before. This is a great group and nobody wants to hurt anybody. It just happens when you deal with other human beings. We have all at some time or another, complained because we felt in some way we were not treated the way we thought we should have been. That's why I think we should be careful not to say anything at all about farmers other then to say what they sell. Jane > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.