Guest guest Posted February 27, 2001 Report Share Posted February 27, 2001 I've read on numerous occasions both here and elsewhere of the superior training methods of athletes from the former Eastern bloc countries as being the primary reason for the success of their athletes. If this is truly so how does one explain the relative lack of success achieved by these athletes since the collapse of the former communist regimes. In particular, the successes of East Germany, and the USSR have never been replicated across a range of sports in the 1990's, in particular, athletics. Since the training methods have presumably remained constant does this not represent an argument in favour of the fact that it was a systematic program of doping in those countries which was the primary reason for their success, rather than superior training methods? Rajinder Johal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.