Guest guest Posted July 11, 2009 Report Share Posted July 11, 2009 Dear all,There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years oldThird, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate.Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.htmlbest wishes Cowleysarahcowley183@...http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2009 Report Share Posted July 11, 2009 Hi , thanks for this I usually read the Independant but didn't today so good job you did! I have been hitting my head against a brick wall with dOMESTIC ABUSE AND AND INFORMATION SHARING. i HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO CREATE A MORE PROACTIVE INFO SHARING POLICY BETWEEN HEALTH AND POLICE REGARDING dv. It was going reasonably well then fell down. Locally when police attend an incident they have to gain consent for info share , this goes to childrens services . If consent isn't sought (usually the case as officers often don't seek it unless it is obviously a child protection case , ie child injured or witnessed violent attack) Therefore large numbers don't go anywhere. Indeed I attend our local MARAc which is an adult protection conference for DV, Vicims' children are discussed . Sometimes despite multi agency agreement that the children are at high risk they are not placed under a s47 , child protection procedures . This is complicated further that when a S17 (Child in need) referral is rec'd by childrens services it is often not actioned further. Managing these cases for HV's is often very stressful . Obviuosly police will not attend every incident so whilst it appears a one off to police it isn't to the child. Whitehouse in Worcester has set up and got this share all policy with police. Interestingly she has developed a risk assessment that states if a child calls the police the situation should be considered high risk . I agree. Unfortunatley as with all areas , locally our police dept are underresourced and child protection in terms of Targets is a low priority (or so it seems) The police in the local family protection unit agreed to a early intervention project , involving universal services and CAF, however due to their limited resources (genuine) it had to be scrapped. I have resigned myself to obtaining details of pregnant women to share with Universal services. Its a start but very frustarting when you consider the large amount of young children receiving no help. Population Paradox again I guess. Nicky Stanley is going to release some work for NSPCC regarding what children "thought " would happen when police attended a DV incident . I hope it shows the stark disparity in terms of what actually happens. I really feel that the police hold so much essential info regarding families that univerasl services attends that could make a real difference in terms of safeguarding . Unfortunatley I believe this all needs a real shake up and targets and thresholds need to be really looked at hard. Rant over ,Sharm x From: sarahcowley183@...Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:09:37 +0100Subject: when child deaths are crime Dear all, There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years old Third, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate. Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html best wishes Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Well, the programme was advertised as 'hard-hitting,' and it was. I think it was also pretty balanced, identifying the whole range of services other than children's social care that have responsibilities in this field. Obi Amadi spoke well (if briefly) for health visiting, agreeing that the service is too stretched to provide the kind of service that is needed. Above all, the programme gave a voice to bereaved relatives, which was pretty heart breaking to watch. I wonder if there will be any official follow-up?If you missed it, see http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/series-31/episode-1On 11 Jul 2009, at 19:37, Cowley wrote:Hi SharmanIt will be interesting to see the programme, given that they are saying that the deaths are often 'not social service's fault,' highlighting other service's responsibilities. The Dispatches programme is on Channel 4 at 8pm on Monday, not Tuesday. On 11 Jul 2009, at 19:30, sharman burchell wrote:Hi , thanks for this I usually read the Independant but didn't today so good job you did! I have been hitting my head against a brick wall with dOMESTIC ABUSE AND AND INFORMATION SHARING. i HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO CREATE A MORE PROACTIVE INFO SHARING POLICY BETWEEN HEALTH AND POLICE REGARDING dv. It was going reasonably well then fell down. Locally when police attend an incident they have to gain consent for info share , this goes to childrens services . If consent isn't sought (usually the case as officers often don't seek it unless it is obviously a child protection case , ie child injured or witnessed violent attack) Therefore large numbers don't go anywhere. Indeed I attend our local MARAc which is an adult protection conference for DV, Vicims' children are discussed . Sometimes despite multi agency agreement that the children are at high risk they are not placed under a s47 , child protection procedures . This is complicated further that when a S17 (Child in need) referral is rec'd by childrens services it is often not actioned further. Managing these cases for HV's is often very stressful . Obviuosly police will not attend every incident so whilst it appears a one off to police it isn't to the child. Whitehouse in Worcester has set up and got this share all policy with police. Interestingly she has developed a risk assessment that states if a child calls the police the situation should be considered high risk . I agree. Unfortunatley as with all areas , locally our police dept are underresourced and child protection in terms of Targets is a low priority (or so it seems) The police in the local family protection unit agreed to a early intervention project , involving universal services and CAF, however due to their limited resources (genuine) it had to be scrapped. I have resigned myself to obtaining details of pregnant women to share with Universal services. Its a start but very frustarting when you consider the large amount of young children receiving no help. Population Paradox again I guess. Nicky Stanley is going to release some work for NSPCC regarding what children "thought " would happen when police attended a DV incident . I hope it shows the stark disparity in terms of what actually happens. I really feel that the police hold so much essential info regarding families that univerasl services attends that could make a real difference in terms of safeguarding . Unfortunatley I believe this all needs a real shake up and targets and thresholds need to be really looked at hard. Rant over ,Sharm x From: sarahcowley183btinternetDate: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:09:37 +0100Subject: when child deaths are crimeDear all,There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years oldThird, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate.Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.htmlbest wishes Cowleysarahcowley183btinternethttp://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COnBeyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Cowleysarahcowley183btinternethttp://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Cowleysarahcowley183@...http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 I too thought it was pretty balanced but what for me it did show is the need for more communication and the lack of joined up thinking which comes out of so many SCR and way back form the days of Caldwell and Jasmine Beckford. On line there is the report from the latest biennial analysis of SCR – 156 pages! But there is a good research brief which shows how the chaotic behaviour of families is mirrored in professionals and how such professionals require skilled support and guidance to wade through this and really help these families. I found myself thinking how does this relate to the FNP as many of these chaotic families would not qualify but would benefit.. I understand it will be available in hard copy soon. Web site for full report is www.dcsf.gov.uk/reseach/ and the report number is DCSF-RR129 Margaret From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Cowley Sent: 13 July 2009 23:01 Subject: Re: when child deaths are crime Well, the programme was advertised as 'hard-hitting,' and it was. I think it was also pretty balanced, identifying the whole range of services other than children's social care that have responsibilities in this field. Obi Amadi spoke well (if briefly) for health visiting, agreeing that the service is too stretched to provide the kind of service that is needed. Above all, the programme gave a voice to bereaved relatives, which was pretty heart breaking to watch. I wonder if there will be any official follow-up? If you missed it, see http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/series-31/episode-1 On 11 Jul 2009, at 19:37, Cowley wrote: Hi Sharman It will be interesting to see the programme, given that they are saying that the deaths are often 'not social service's fault,' highlighting other service's responsibilities. The Dispatches programme is on Channel 4 at 8pm on Monday, not Tuesday. On 11 Jul 2009, at 19:30, sharman burchell wrote: Hi , thanks for this I usually read the Independant but didn't today so good job you did! I have been hitting my head against a brick wall with dOMESTIC ABUSE AND AND INFORMATION SHARING. i HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO CREATE A MORE PROACTIVE INFO SHARING POLICY BETWEEN HEALTH AND POLICE REGARDING dv. It was going reasonably well then fell down. Locally when police attend an incident they have to gain conse nt for info share , this goes to childrens services . If consent isn't sought (usually the case as officers often don't seek it unless it is obviously a child protection case , ie child injured or witnessed violent attack) Therefore large numbers don't go anywhere. Indeed I attend our local MARAc which is an adult protection conference for DV, Vicims' children are discussed . Sometimes despite multi agency agreement that the children are at high risk they are not placed under a s47 , child protection procedures . This is complicated further that when a S17 (Child in need) referral is rec'd by childrens services it is often not actioned further. Managing these cases for HV's is often very stressful . Obviuosly police will not attend every incident so whilst it appears a one off to police it isn't to the child. Whitehouse in Worcester has set up and got this share all policy with police. Interestingly she has developed a risk assessment that states if a child calls the police the situation should be considered high risk . I agree. Unfortunatley as with all areas , locally our police dept are underresourced and child protection in terms of Targets is a low priority (or so it seems) The police in the local family protection unit agreed to a early intervention project , involving universal services and CAF, however due to their limited resources (genuine) it had to be scrapped. I have resigned myself to obtaining details of pregnant women to share with Universal services. Its a start but very frustarting when you consider the large amount of young children receiving no help. Population Paradox again I guess. Nicky Stanley is going to release some work for NSPCC regarding what children " thought " would happen when police attended a DV incident . I hope it shows the stark disparity in terms of what actually happens. I really feel that the police hold so much essential info regarding families that univerasl services attends that could make a real difference in terms of safeguarding . Unfortunatley I believe this all needs a real shake up and targets and thresholds need to be really looked at hard. Rant over ,Sharm x From: sarahcowley183btinternet Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:09:37 +0100 Subject: when child deaths are crime Dear all, There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years old Third, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate. Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html best wishes Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn < /div> Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 That sounds interesting Margaret. I remember when I did my research way back and found some evidence about the high percentage of insecure attachments in nurses and my concerns related to the attachment patterns in these families it felt like a minefield! Good therapeutic supervision would be a start. Is that available to HV's doing the Family Nurse Partnership? Ann when child deaths are crime Dear all, There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years old Third, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate. Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html best wishes Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn < /div> Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.9/2228 - Release Date: 07/09/09 18:07:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 Hi Ann I understand it is and is helpful but know there have been problems with it in places but at least it is recognition that it is needed. I spoke to one of the researchers who did the SCR work last week and he was clear about the needs for good therapeutic supervision when working with such cases. Margaret From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Ann Girling Sent: 14 July 2009 08:34 Subject: Re: when child deaths are crime That sounds interesting Margaret. I remember when I did my research way back and found some evidence about the high percentage of insecure attachments in nurses and my concerns related to the attachment patterns in these families it felt like a minefield! Good therapeutic supervision would be a start. Is that available to HV's doing the Family Nurse Partnership? Ann when child deaths are crime Dear all, There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years old Third, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate. Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html best wishes Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn < /div> size=2 width="100%" align=center> Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn size=2 width="100%" align=center> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.9/2228 - Release Date: 07/09/09 18:07:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 That's good .. although i remain sceptical! when child deaths are crime Dear all, There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years old Third, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate. Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html best wishes Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn < /div> size=2 width="100%" align=center> Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn size=2 width="100%" align=center> No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.9/2228 - Release Date: 07/09/09 18:07:00 No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.9/2228 - Release Date: 07/09/09 18:07:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 Hi all , yes the programme was quite tough watching I must admit . new guidance re safeguarding disabled children , who are of course exceptionally vulnerable. regards Sharman p From: margaret@...Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:16:07 +0100Subject: RE: when child deaths are crime Hi Ann I understand it is and is helpful but know there have been problems with it in places but at least it is recognition that it is needed. I spoke to one of the researchers who did the SCR work last week and he was clear about the needs for good therapeutic supervision when working with such cases. Margaret From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Ann GirlingSent: 14 July 2009 08:34 Subject: Re: when child deaths are crime That sounds interesting Margaret. I remember when I did my research way back and found some evidence about the high percentage of insecure attachments in nurses and my concerns related to the attachment patterns in these families it felt like a minefield! Good therapeutic supervision would be a start. Is that available to HV's doing the Family Nurse Partnership? Ann when child deaths are crime Dear all, There was an interesting piece in yesterday's Independent, baldly heading child deaths as 'crime,' when talking about children being murdered by their family. It was written to advertise a Dispatches programme on Channel 4, on Tuesday I think. Three things in it caught my eye: First that figures of child deaths have risen markedly since 2004, which is the year that health visitor numbers started to fall off a cliff (although they did not make that connection). Second, 68% of the cases concerned children aged under four years old Third, they are recommending a 'compulsory annual visit' by either a health visitor or trained advocate. Read the report at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/one-child-in-britain-is-killed-like-baby-peter-every-week-1740220.html best wishes Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn < /div> size=2 width="100%" align=center> Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more. Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Cowley sarahcowley183btinternet http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn size=2 width="100%" align=center> No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.9/2228 - Release Date: 07/09/09 18:07:00 View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more! 1 of 1 File(s) a1.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.