Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: REACH update

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

At 09:48 AM 1/2/2007, you wrote:

>Tony has posted this, and I've written asking why

>is it that EOs for food and medicine aren't being

>regulated #2, below, yet for fragrance the

>regulations are in place? Anyone from the EU on

>this group who can comment? I'm thinking we in

>the US and Canada and other places outside the EU

>aren't that affected by this, unless we import

>through the EU? I'm not sure of that last

>statement, so feel free to add your comments:

Here's Tony's eye-opener reply:

>Yes Anya, re: the differences between allowable ingredients in

>fragrances vs. food: flavourings - you have hit the nail on the head precisely.

>

>For example. Peru balsam is widely reported as a fragrance allergen.

>Dermatologists (curiously) often report increasing frequency of

>reaction to Peru balsam in current skin allergy testing when

>production volumes of Peru balsam have been in physical decline over

>the last 10-20 years at least (the decline reflects a reduced demand

>due to IFRA restrictions for Peru balsam oil/absolute in perfumery,

>which are soon to be imported into Annex`III of the EU Cosmetics

>Directive). Ms. Api, head of RIFM, reports (completely incorrectly

>in my opinion) that this sustained reactivity is because those

>identical components of Peru balsam - such as the weak allergens

>benzyl benzoate & benzyl cinnamate - are still in use in fragrance

>construction. These are anyway not the main allergens in Peru balsam

>and I believe the real reason for this apparent skin sensitivity

>increase to Peru balsam is connected more with cross-reactivity.

>

>However, various published papers have connected the dietary intake

>of Peru balsam oil as causing skin sensitisation problems (peru

>balsam oil is widely used in confectionary, chocolate, alcoholic

>liqueurs and other flavourings). So the fragrance industry is

>regulated, the flavourings industry, with exactly the same problem, isn't.

>

>I believe the problem lies with the prejudiced attitudes of powerful

>dermatologists, some of whom " have it in " for the perfume industry.

>I wrote this for Cropwatch not so long ago:

>

> " Remember that the chairman of the SCCP, Ian White, previously

>claimed that self-regulation had failed to protect consumer interest

>in the perfumery industry, especially with regard to fragrance

>sensitivity, and that a think-tank had been set up " consisting of a

>balanced representation of dermatologists, fragrance-compound

>manufacturers and users to address aspects of 'problems' and 'needs'

> " (White 1998). How a person with these decidedly non-neutral

>opinions about the fragrance industry should become chairman of the

>SCCP is a complete mystery to Cropwatch, and the measures put in the

>place of voluntary regulation since Ian White has been chairman of

>the SCCP have not actually decreased the incidence of fragrance

>sensitivity (which has arguably increased if anything). You will

>also note that the representation of end-users has never actually

>materialised, so that fragrance regulation has effectively become a

>narrow-spectrum stitch-up between dermatologists, expense-account

>executives of the major aroma industry players and those in

>professional organisations which are financially dependent on the

>same major players, together with an assortment of university

>professors. This is why Cropwatch believes that the SCCP should be

>reformed with panellists from a wider and more directly experienced

>section of the European community. "

>

>I am currently writing to the EU Commission (with a copy to the

>European Ombudsman) re: the Public Consultation of moving various

>natural fragrance ingredients into Annex` III of the Cosmetics

>Directive (closing date for objection 27th Jan 2007). The term

>'Public Consultation' is just a regulatory ploy to pretend there is

>democracy within the EU - we all know that the opinions of the

>public will be ignored and anyway the grounds for objection are too

>narrow for it to be comprehensive. Hence my copy to the Ombudsman.

>

>Anybody wanting a copy of the pdf outlining the proposed changes, or

>with a view to share views, please e-mail me.

>

>Cheers,

>

>Tony

>www.cropwatch.org

Anya McCoy

Anya's Garden of Natural Perfume http://anyasgarden.com

Artisan Natural Perfumers Guild http://artisannaturalperfumers.org

Natural Perfumers Community Group

/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...