Guest guest Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Nagin raps deadline on gutting homes Aug. 29 too soon, he says of ordinance Saturday, April 22, 2006 By Bruce Eggler Staff writer The New Orleans City Council's vote this week to require homeowners to clean, gut and board up flooded homes by the first anniversary of Hurricane Katrina came as welcome news to some but drew fire from others, including Mayor Ray Nagin. Advertisement The measure gives residents until Aug. 29 to clean out mold, tear out ruined walls and board up what remains of their homes, or risk having the city seize and demolish their houses. Councilman Jay Batt, sponsor of the council's ordinance, said it was necessary because ravaged, mold-infested houses, especially if not boarded up, can become " environmental biohazards " that will slow the recovery of whole neighborhoods by discouraging nearby owners from moving back or making repairs. But Nagin said he thinks Aug. 29 is too early for such a deadline, though he did not say whether he would veto the ordinance, which passed 7-0. It would take five council votes to override a veto. " Homeowners are already making decisions. They're moving forward. They're not waiting on anything, " Nagin said in Thursday night's televised mayoral debate. " We had 125,000 homes that had some type of damage with Katrina. About 60 percent of those homes had less than 50 percent damage. So those folks have already gotten their permits; they're rockin' and rollin'; they're ready to go. " The rest are a combination of people who are spread out all over the country, particularly senior citizens. I think they need special treatment, and I think Aug. 29 is too soon. And by year's end, we should have a program in place to contact those residents and make sure they're coming back. " Despite the mayor's objection, the council's action pleased many residents who have been worried for months that their efforts to repair or rebuild their homes would be undermined if neighbors leave their properties to molder and rot. Former City Councilman Shea and Leland Champagne, next-door neighbors in Lakeview, said in February they were concerned that the money they were spending to renovate their properties could go for naught if nearby homes continue to sit blighted and abandoned, potential breeding grounds for rodents and havens for vagrants. Champagne moves today into his Argonne Street home, which remains surrounded by vast swaths of damaged homes. Mired in uncertainty But the owners of some untouched houses said Friday there are good reasons they have yet to do anything to their properties. Chief among them, they said, is the fact that thousands of homeowners are still waiting for insurance settlements or Small Business Administration loans, and waiting for the state to decide who will qualify for repair grants or buyouts as part of Gov. Kathleen Blanco's recovery program. " Many homeowners are going through the process of borrowing money from the SBA, which is giving us hell, " one frustrated homeowner said in an e-mail to The Times-Picayune. There is also widespread confusion about whether some neighborhoods will be rebuilt at all, and if so, how high residents will have to elevate their homes. " I do not have the money nor the time to do anything to the house until FEMA and everyone else decides what I can do, and funding becomes available for such actions, " said Trachtenberg, a Gentilly resident now living in Metairie. " It does not make economic sense to gut, then tear down. " Trachtenberg said he thinks the ordinance " is an unconstitutional taking, is overly broad and a power grab by those with the money and the impatience to return too fast. Any attempts to take my property will result in federal court action. " Eastern New Orleans resident Diane Calamia said it might make sense to require cleaning and boarding up of houses in neighborhoods such as Lakeview, where it seems probable that large numbers of residents will return and the neighborhoods will be substantially rebuilt. But in many parts of eastern New Orleans, Calamia said, residents have no idea whether their neighborhood will ever come back, and many see no point in spending thousands of dollars on a house that could end up being bulldozed along with all of its neighbors. " Right now you can't even sell the property, " she said. Town house dilemma Fellow eastern New Orleans resident Rosemary said she owns one of seven Tara Lane town houses, all under a common roof but owned separately. Although she has cleaned out her unit, she said, the owners of most of the others have done nothing, and she fears the entire building might be declared blighted no matter how much money she spends on her townhouse. Other owners questioned whether the city would seize and sell their land, or simply demolish the house and leave the land in their possession. " Will the land be confiscated or will it still belong to the owner? " one resident asked. The ordinance provides no answer to that question. To help homeowners who need financial assistance to remediate their property, Batt said, a Web site will be set up listing nonprofit organizations that can work with them. The council also added an amendment to provide a process for reviewing hardship cases. When a notice is sent out telling an owner that a property is being considered for designation as a public nuisance, information on the review process will be included. In addition to a possible veto by Nagin, the ordinance could be altered or scrapped if the new council, scheduled to take office by the beginning of June, objects to it in its current form. .. . . . . . . Bruce Eggler can be reached at beggler@... or (504) 826-3320. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.