Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 For your information. This national Sure Start Evaluation research includes health visiting and I think presents a fair pictuure of some of the cuurent strengths and problems of the service. I have put some selected quotes in italics below but the whole can be read or downloaded from the dfes link. Unfortunately the references to Elkan for which they rely on evidence of effectiveness of health visiting, are given as 2005 in the text when it was 2000. This is misleading as it sounds up to date and does not touch on later reviews such as the HDA Bull et al. Also refers to some out of date practice with hearing tests. It covers a variety of models and good practice. The DfES has published research on Outreach and Home Visiting Services in Sure Start Local Programmes, which were set up to focus on the most isolated families. Further Information: available online http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/NESS2006FR017.pdf Outreach and Home Visiting Services in Sure Start Local Programmes Where health managers were involved in the design of programmes, midwifery and health visiting services were likely to be central to the outreach approach. Where there were paraprofessionals involved, it was to support midwives and health visitors. F: Health Team This is the most widespread model, it builds on existing services. The teams comprised Sure Start staff and local health visitors, midwives, psychologists, and other health professionals (CPNs, occupational therapists). They deliver ante and post-natal support and screen for postnatal depression. Emphasis is on the well being of the parent and ensuring attachment to the child and healthy behaviours. Staff Health visitors and midwives responded well to the SSLP integration of services because they could refer families to a much more extensive range of back-up services. Not all pre-existing health visitors had collaborated with Sure Start, the influencing factor being the attitude of their managers. Over time relationships could improve, often because the services themselves became more focused and existing services could see that they were having an effect. Staff noted many benefits, to themselves and their work, of being part of a multi-agency team. 4.2.1 Increased resources to offer families The strongest approval for the outreach and home visiting approach came from staff who had already been involved in it before Sure Start: midwives and health visitors. They had seen the resources available to families increase dramatically. One health visitor said that in the past she did not dare to introduce certain ideas to families because she knew that they were not feasible, available or affordable. Because Sure Start had developed a wide range of back up services she could now get into a conversation with a family about needs, and have somewhere to refer them to meet those needs. Elsewhere a midwife described similar benefits: “We try to link in with groups run by other organisations as well. I’ve worked with people I wouldn’t have thought of, like the Job Centre. It’s about tailor-made care, we refer the family to the appropriate people” (Midwife). These two pre-existing services often refer to themselves as the ‘gateway’ to Sure Start. They may invite other workers to make joint visits with them. Dr Coles PhD BA RHV RGN Research Fellow Department of Child Health Cardiff University, School of Medicine Heath Park Cardiff CF14 4XN Telephone Direct line 02920 74 2160 Department Secretary 02920 743374/5 http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/medicine/child_health/research/community/prevention http://www.core-info.cf.ac.uk/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.