Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 Maggi Quinlan, Ph.D. Hi Maggi, I have read news articles describing allergic reactions to fragrance, but until now have not read such a personal description of the problem. Still, I am baffled. I can understand how a person can be allergic to certain of the molecules that are found in fragrant materials. But, what is it that makes these molecules allergins solely when they are in synthetic blends? Why do they not produce the same reaction when they are in " natural " surroundings? If you were allergic to, say, phenyl ethyl alcohol, why in synthetic rose but not in natural rose? Why are our perfumes safer? The chemist (long ago) in me says there should be no difference. Has the medical profession weighed in on this question? Steve Earl Glen Custom Perfumery Hi Steve, My thinking about this does not go to the chemicals themselves, but rather to the wisdom of the body. Given that the olfactory nerve goes unmediated to the limbic part of the brain, (center for emotion and memory) which controls the hypothalamas and pituitary, the primary biochemical centers of the body, I'm more inclined to think that these glands have the innate intelligence to determine what is harmful and what is not. We smell rotten food, and are repelled, safety has happened through the nose. My experience may also have to do with saturation. For many years, synthetics did not bother me at all. It was only after working with them directly in great quantity that my allergy developed. Did my body reach a maximum safe saturation, after which the biochemical brain says no to more? I know this happens to people with foods, why not with smells? I do know one person who has severe reactions to select airborn essential oils, just the same as I do to chemicals, and synthetics don't bother her at all. I don't think there are clear cut answers that apply to all people. But my bias is that we have too many synthetic chemicals in our lives, in ways we do not think about. The fact that so many people are developing sensitivities, and auto-immune problems, etc., makes my bias want to err on the side of caution. Only time and lots of research will determine what has merit. I don't think the medical community has weighed in yet, because I don't think there if enough recognition of the difference between naturals and synthetics in allopathy. In the last 13 years I have had to teach many hundreds of people how to smell deeply. I recognized that as North Americans, we have developed a habit of smelling in very short intakes. My assumption is that this developed as a protective mechanism for the body. When I would ask people to smell the essential oils deeply they were able to follow the smell right to the part of the body that was in need of support. It happened every time and taught me about the relationship between high quality, therapeutic oils, the body wisdom and healing through the nose. Only the high quality oils had this effect. The synthetics stopped right at the bridge of the nose, as did the low quality essentials. So I think it's important to recognize the relationship between living substances and the resonance they create with the body wisdom. There seems to be a communication that happens there. What determines the nature of that dialogue is going to be dependent on an infinite number of variables. It is part of what determines who likes what smell. Simple recognition, complex causality. I don't know if this is an answer to your question, but perhaps just an opening for more questions. In any event, for now I am enjoying the mystery, and appreciate diving deeper into it. Thanks for stimulating the thoughts. Breathe in Health Maggi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 ( -- moderator here -- a lot of your post was snipped because there were so many quotes. It was also edited to correct topposting.) Maggi, et al. I have a severe reaction to patchouli, part of the reason I think this is, is due to the fact that it is made from a wood and distilling this does not remove the mold completely (it's very hard to remove mold from anything entirely or so it seems to me.). I am highly allergic to wood molds. Pine mold, oak mold, etc. I have passed out 2 times due to inhalation of patchouli once I almost had to be hospitalized.. However I have only ever had one reaction to a perfume.. It was obsession.. I believe that some of the synthetic chemicals can mimic the original so closely that it causes the same reaction, in some people (not everyone is that sensitive to scent.) You also have to take in to account that the synthetics may be made from similar chemical components. If they are and the person is allergic to the component and not the actual scent they will have a reaction. If they are not allergic to the synthetic, then the component of the Natural that they are allergic to is not there. Since everything has a chemical make up and it takes many chemicals to make up one scent you would have to be able to isolate the specific chemical component that the person is allergic to... and exposure to certain things over a period of time can cause allergic reaction... I also have a sensitivity to sandalwood EO, but not the synthetic. It just boggles my mind how different combinations of the same thing can get a totally different reaction, but it is all about chemistry isn't it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.