Guest guest Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 Rosemary, Well as long as you held off as long as possible in reading the instructions...I guess it's okay that you succeeded. I haven't run into the problem with people figuring out how to fill it out. I just tell them it's a continuum scale ranging from one to seven with, for example, pays attention well ranking 1 and constantly distracted ranking a 7. Four would be somewhere in the middle--somewhat of a problem. Since this is a subjective assessment, when I see someone ranking everything 6 or 7--EVERYTHING!--that tells me plenty about that person right off the bat. I guess I would then go back and ask him to skim through the list and pick the 4-5 items that he considered the biggest problems. Or don't worry about the list and just work with him on defining training objectives. Glad you got it working. Pete > > From: " Rosemary Herron " <reherron@...> > Date: 2006/06/10 Sat PM 09:29:16 EDT > < > > Subject: New Subjective " ver2 " > > Pete, > > After much cursing, gnashing of teeth and....... reading of directions ;-) I now get numbers instead of all zeros on the report. > > Now I need some input on how to fill it out. Took me a long time and the clients who have done it were confused also. And for those of us who have trouble making up our minds (oops Fp1/Fp2)....it's even harder. > > 1. Does a " 4 " mean neutral... none of each, or some of each, or the average...example... " some days he is a 1 and some days he is a 7 " ? What do you tell people about how to fill it out? > > 2. I have a young man who has many more 6s and 7s than will fit on the report page. I went through and made up a new list putting 4s in for all the ones that were reported on the first time and the rest came through this time with some sites listed that did not come up the first time. I know the numbers are not valid but is there anything else I might be missing in doing this? > > Rosemary > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2006 Report Share Posted June 11, 2006 Pete, I would like to be able to see the whole 'key': like on the former Sub assessment, the Process page. That would help me get to know the symptoms and their respective locations. Also, I think it's way too long, and i've been meaning to get back to it to see if there are some clarifications and reductions in the questions that could be made... BUT thanks so much for making the change to "location, location, location'!!!! New Subjective "ver2"> > Pete,> > After much cursing, gnashing of teeth and....... reading of directions ;-) I now get numbers instead of all zeros on the report.> > Now I need some input on how to fill it out. Took me a long time and the clients who have done it were confused also. And for those of us who have trouble making up our minds (oops Fp1/Fp2)....it's even harder.> > 1. Does a "4" mean neutral... none of each, or some of each, or the average...example..."some days he is a 1 and some days he is a 7"? What do you tell people about how to fill it out?> > 2. I have a young man who has many more 6s and 7s than will fit on the report page. I went through and made up a new list putting 4s in for all the ones that were reported on the first time and the rest came through this time with some sites listed that did not come up the first time. I know the numbers are not valid but is there anything else I might be missing in doing this?> > Rosemary> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2006 Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 Since it's subjective, pretty much any consistent way you/the client choose to do it is okay. > > From: " Rah " <wheelihan82@...> > Date: 2006/06/10 Sat PM 10:20:43 EDT > > Subject: Re: New Subjective " ver2 " > > I had the same trouble deciding how to fill this out!! > I ended up doing it different ways. I did conservative, worst, > moderate - if it swings from day to day I put in a medium number, but > considered it an issue because of the changeability - and looked to > see how the results varied. All of them had the same main issues > identified but were different in ranking of sites. > > I was going to ask about this too, but I thought if I waited long > enough it would all become clear! > > Rah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.