Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Focusing on individuals as ultimately responsible, and blaming building design as automatically culpable without regard to ambient circumstances ignores the nature of spore propagation and satellite colonies in the perpetuation of this emerging phenomenon. Any building subjected to a spore plume of viable conidia is going to become an opportunity for mold to reproduce whether the building is constructed well or poorly - at any opportune site that presents itself. All buildings have suitable substrate and condensation no matter how well they are built. Put a perfectly constructed building in the path of a spore plume and the results are inevitable unless that building has ABNORMALLY good mechanisms for condensation control or a total lack of any cellulose substrate at the condensation interface on exterior walls. I've spent years listening to hopeful concepts of reducing humidity in buildings which sound like a logical solution and give the Appearance of Good Science but are meaningless when the condensation interface at exterior walls is going to be present no matter how much the humidity is reduced in the center of the building. The interface exists even in the driest desert climate - if the air outside is cold enough. If suitable substrate, the condensation interface and viable spores all come together at the same point, the results are unavoidable. We have seen that an HVAC system subjected to a stream of viable spores can easily create colonies on bare metal, with only the organic material and customary condensation to subsist upon. This cannot be corrected by changing the design. Placing the blame upon the HVAC doesn't make sense when the basic materials and function do not support mold growth without the spore stream. Blaming the building itself is counterproductive if the basic materials and design are not normally conducive to mold growth and only was unfortunate enough to be subjected to a viable plume from elsewhere. " Good Design " isn't good enough if the structure is downwind of a mold colony. This mold is another " Cell from Hell " like Pfiesteria. It makes little sense to blame the owner of the lake you were swimming in when you got sick when the lakeowner himself is being wiped out and destroyed by ecological circumstances beyond his control. The process destroying that lake is pan-ecological and far beyond the ability and means of an idividual or property owner to correct. Society has been slow to identify the scope of this phenomenon just as it has with other comparable biotoxin scourges - only looking at the most noticeable effects and not the source. Sick Building Syndrome is not a matter of bad building design. It is a Natural Disaster. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.