Guest guest Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 I have to disagree on this one. haveing lived 10 years(in the 70's- 80's )with a conasuer of this, I can tell you that moldy majawana does not sell and is not considered a marketable substance, and conasuers of this are very paticular of dring methods. I believe that cigars are a different subject and the smell of them wipes me out. I dought if the tabaco companys give a crap as to how moldy theri tabaco is and even the undried tabaco leaves are used as rappers. on the subject of nuts,(privite joke,lol) anyway, seriously, I noticed that peanuts still in the shell caused my nose to drip, drip, and realized that the shells(the ones I used to love to lick for the salt) are moldy. I dont seem to have a allergy to nuts, except for this reaction to the shell. --- In , LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: > > I would not be surprised if mold exposure/toxicity was one of the > major factors driving drug use/abuse in this country. (which one would > then have to look at as self-medication) > > After all, we know that mycotoxins can cause depression, ADD/ADHD-like > symptoms caused by low neurotransmitters, etc. > > Think about it... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 >>On Behalf Of who on the subject of nuts,(privite joke,lol) anyway, seriously, I noticed that peanuts still in the shell caused my nose to drip, drip, and realized that the shells(the ones I used to love to lick for the salt) are moldy. I dont seem to have a allergy to nuts, except for this reaction to the shell.>> Peanuts are known for their aflatoxins and I avoid them. Rosie Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Aug 1;38(15):4049-55. Related Articles, Links Mycotoxin risk assessment for the purpose of setting international regulatory standards.Wu F. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, A718 Crabtree Hall, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. fwu@... The 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Mycotoxin report states that one 21st century goal is the development of uniform regulations worldwide for foodborne mycotoxin contamination. This study informs that endeavor by a risk assessment and economic analysis of two important mycotoxins: fumonisins and aflatoxins. The goals are to identify the nations that would be most heavily impacted by tighter mycotoxin regulations, examine costs and benefits as a function of regulatory stringency, and address risk-risk tradeoffs between health benefits and economic losses from compliance with those regulations. Among industrial nations, the United States would experience the heaviest economic losses from more precautionary mycotoxin standards. Environmental conditions in the developing world, however, are more conducive to mycotoxin accumulation in crops. Contrary to concerns expressed among policymakers, the less developed countries that would likely experience the greatest loss from tighter mycotoxin standards are not sub-Saharan African nations, but China and Argentina. If a fumonisin standard of 0.5 mg/kg were adopted worldwide, total export losses from fumonisins in corn may exceed 300 million dollars annually: 3-fold higher than if the less stringent U.S. standard of 2 mg/kg were adopted. Likewise, export losses from aflatoxins in peanuts may exceed 450 million dollars under the current EU regulatory standard of 4 microg/kg: almost 5-fold higher than if the U.S. standard of 20 microg/kg were adopted. Stricter standards are unlikely to improve health significantly. In developing nations such as China where hepatitis B and C are prevalent, tighter aflatoxin standards may increase health risks until improved control methods for aflatoxins are found, as high-quality crops may be exported instead of being consumed domestically. PMID: 15352440 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 this is strange isnt it. you would think that I would have the same reaction to nuts, as I do with corn, but I dont. I cant say I have no reaction at all, but its mild compared to corn. a person has to eat something. mabye the differnce is because nuts are hard and mold is mainly in the shell, where mold in corn is in the kernels. just a guess. > > >>On Behalf Of who > on the subject of nuts,(privite joke,lol) anyway, seriously, I noticed > that peanuts still in the shell caused my nose to drip, drip, and > realized that the shells(the ones I used to love to lick for the salt) > are moldy. I dont seem to have a allergy to nuts, except for this > reaction to the shell.>> > > Peanuts are known for their aflatoxins and I avoid them. > Rosie > > Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Aug 1;38(15):4049-55. Related Articles, > Links > Mycotoxin risk assessment for the purpose of setting international > regulatory standards.Wu F. > Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Graduate School of > Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, A718 Crabtree Hall, 130 DeSoto > Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. fwu@... > > The 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Mycotoxin report > states that one 21st century goal is the development of uniform regulations > worldwide for foodborne mycotoxin contamination. This study informs that > endeavor by a risk assessment and economic analysis of two important > mycotoxins: fumonisins and aflatoxins. The goals are to identify the nations > that would be most heavily impacted by tighter mycotoxin regulations, > examine costs and benefits as a function of regulatory stringency, and > address risk-risk tradeoffs between health benefits and economic losses from > compliance with those regulations. Among industrial nations, the United > States would experience the heaviest economic losses from more precautionary > mycotoxin standards. Environmental conditions in the developing world, > however, are more conducive to mycotoxin accumulation in crops. Contrary to > concerns expressed among policymakers, the less developed countries that > would likely experience the greatest loss from tighter mycotoxin standards > are not sub-Saharan African nations, but China and Argentina. If a fumonisin > standard of 0.5 mg/kg were adopted worldwide, total export losses from > fumonisins in corn may exceed 300 million dollars annually: 3-fold higher > than if the less stringent U.S. standard of 2 mg/kg were adopted. Likewise, > export losses from aflatoxins in peanuts may exceed 450 million dollars > under the current EU regulatory standard of 4 microg/kg: almost 5- fold > higher than if the U.S. standard of 20 microg/kg were adopted. Stricter > standards are unlikely to improve health significantly. In developing > nations such as China where hepatitis B and C are prevalent, tighter > aflatoxin standards may increase health risks until improved control methods > for aflatoxins are found, as high-quality crops may be exported instead of > being consumed domestically. > > PMID: 15352440 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 I didn't mean 'moldy marijuana' - I was actually talking about the drug usage being a reaction to the brain issues caused by chronic mold exposure, perhaps starting as a child or even as a fetus (don't know if mold toxins cross the placental barrier..but I would nt be surprised) The point I was trying to make is that tolerance of mold toxins and resistance to doing something about them can have much more far reaching effects in society than we realize and that poor people bear the brunt of those effects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.