Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 http://www.sfbayview.com/021506/criticalofkatrina021506.shtml Congressmen critical of Katrina report by CC -Rock Rep. Jefferson of Louisiana, left, watches skeptically as Rep. Tom , R-Va., chair of the House Select Committee on Hurricane Katrina, discusses the committee's final report during a news conference on Capitol Hill, Wednesday. Photo: Dennis Cook, AP Before the Wednesday release of the final report from the House Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana Congressmen Jefferson and Charlie Melancon issued their own 59-page report entitled " Additional Views Presented by the Select Committee on Behalf of Rep. Charlie Melancon and Rep. J. Jefferson. " The scathing report offers objective criticism of the so-called bipartisan committee. Interestingly, there are no Democrats in the committee. Nor is Louisiana represented on the bipartisan committee. Congressman W. " Chip " Pickering, from Mississippi, is the only legislator on the committee whose state was affected by Hurricane Katrina. However, at least a quarter of the committee's 11 members hail from Texas. So it is not hard to imagine why, as Melancon and Jefferson charge, the committee lacked the will to hold the White House accountable or to use its subpoena powers to demand documents that could shed light on FEMA, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense's failures to respond to an American city underwater and the approximately 1,200 deaths that resulted from levees that were breached in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Essentially, the congressmen charged the committee with being too soft on the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, DOD and the White House, by not insisting on answers to the botched federal response and poor management of resources after Hurricane Katrina wrecked the Gulf Coast. The Democrats' report also took the Bush administration to task for refusing to turn over documents relative to the administration's response to the biggest domestic disaster in U.S. history. " House Resolution 437 directed the Select Committee 'to conduct a full and complete investigation' into the government response to Hurricane Katrina. The Select Committee worked diligently to meet this mandate, and the committee's final report makes an important contribution toward understanding what went wrong. " But due to the committee's short deadline and the refusal of the White House to provide access to essential documents, key questions remain unanswered. We therefore renew our call for an independent commission to examine the disastrous response to Hurricane Katrina. " The legislators were also critical of the committee's failure to find out why the New Orleans levees failed. " The Select Committee's report does not resolve critical questions about levee failures, noting instead that 'the ultimate cause of the levee failures is under investigation and results to be determined.' Questions about why the levees failed are important not only to establish accountability, but to help determine how to rebuild them. The reconstruction process will not be effective unless residents and businesses are confident that they will be protected from catastrophic flooding. " Until Congress addresses this critical failure in a comprehensive and detailed manner, the rebuilding effort will be impeded, " the Minority View Report continued. Among the glaring discrepancies which arose from the Select Committee's investigation is the continuing controversy over when the White House and the Department of Homeland Security knew about the levee breaches. Taking a potshot at conflicting statements, as to when the administration learned about the levee failures, the report stated, " FEMA and Coast Guard officials who were in New Orleans on Monday, Aug. 29, the day the hurricane struck, personally observed levee failures and warned that two-thirds to three-fourths of the city had flooded. " The White House was informed of these crucial facts, but for days and weeks after the hurricane, President Bush and other top administration officials deflected criticism by insisting they were caught by surprise when the levees failed on Tuesday, Aug. 30, the day after Hurricane Katrina. " An important unanswered question is why these top officials persisted in making these misleading assertions. The first official government report of the levee failure appears to have come at 8:14 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 29, 2005, the morning Hurricane Katrina struck, " the representatives asserted. The lawmakers also chided government for not delving deeply into allegations of the " toxic soup " that existed post-Katrina and which still exists, if you ask some New Orleanians. Many who have visited New Orleans can attest to the poor air quality that persists in the city. " I knew a guy who went down to New Orleans to work on his house and now he is in the hospital with mold spores on his lungs, " said New Orleans community activist, Assata Olugbala. A well-recognized crusader for justice in education and prison reform, Olugbala evacuated to Detroit, Michigan. Additionally, in an earlier interview, Malik Rahim, founder of the Common Ground Collective commented, " People are saying they have the 'Katrina cough' or the 'Katrina sniffles,' " he said of common symptoms experienced by city residents. Environmental contamination still present According to the congressmen, " in the immediate aftermath of the storm, independent test data showed dangerously high mold counts and areas of toxic sediments, which pose a serious health risk to returning residents and workers. " For example, indoor sites had spore counts of up to 645,000 spores per cubic meter, rendering homes uninhabitable. In addition, sediment testing " found pervasively high levels of arsenic, as well as high levels of other contaminants, including lead, banned pesticides and cancer-causing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at three specific sites. " " Contamination caused by the hurricane could also be exacerbated by recovery efforts. For example, much of the debris is being disposed of by burning, which has the potential to release toxic air pollutants such as mercury or disposal into unlined landfills, which can allow groundwater contamination. " However, the legislators leveled their harshest criticism at the White House and the Republican-stacked Select Committee for the White House's refusal to cooperate with the investigation and for the Select Committee's refusal to hold the White House accountable. Jefferson and Melancon confirmed repeated attempts to get the documents and testimony necessary to get answers as to the White House role in the emergency management effort. " But we were consistently frustrated. With the exception of Mr. Rapuano, President Bush refused to allow any White House officials to testify or be interviewed by the Select Committee. In addition, multiple efforts were made during the course of the Select Committee's investigation to obtain White House documents that would address these unanswered questions. " In the end, these efforts were frustrated by the refusal of the White House to cooperate and the reluctance of the majority (on the Select Committee) to exercise its authority under House Resolution 437. " The lawmakers explained how Select Committee Chairman and Rep. Melancon sent letters in September 2005 and November 2005 requesting information. And while threatened to use the committee's subpoena power, the committee voted against using subpoenas, in favor of meeting with members of the Bush administration. " When the White House again failed to produce the documents by the deadline, no subpoena was issued. Instead, representatives from the White House Counsel's office met with Select Committee staff on Dec. 1, 2005. At that meeting, the White House officials asserted that compliance would be impossible. " They said responding to the document request would require the review of 71 million email messages and take over one year. They could not explain, however, why other agencies had managed to comply or why they had not begun producing communications from at least the key individuals identified in the Sept. 30 request letter. " During this meeting, the White House officials raised vague concerns about 'separation of powers,' claiming that it would be inappropriate and unprecedented for Congress to obtain the documents the committee was seeking. When asked whether they were asserting a legal claim of executive privilege, they said they were not. " When staff provided multiple examples of past precedents for this type of request -including testimony provided by White House chiefs of staff during the Clinton administration - an official from the White House responded bluntly: 'You're not getting Card's emails.' " " When Rep. Melancon offered his subpoena motion on Dec. 14, 2005, Chairman opposed the motion, reversing the position he had declared publicly on three previous occasions. In explaining his reversal, Chairman stated: 'I don't think that Andy Card's emails are appropriate. We've researched this, in terms of executive privilege and the like. The president doesn't carry a Blackberry with him. For all intents and purposes, the chief of staff is the president. For these reasons, I think that's too inclusive. " Chairman , " the report continued, " also opposed obtaining emails from Joe Hagin, Frances Townsend and Ken Rapuano, but he offered no explanation for his position on these officials. " The report went on to outline more refusals for documents from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and other White House staffers. " Given the key gaps that remain in the Select Committee's work, we recommend the creation of an independent commission based on the model of the 9-11 Commission. The Select Committee has significantly advanced public understanding of the response to Hurricane Katrina, but it failed to surmount White House intransigence and rarely assigned accountability for mistakes. " These shortcomings can only be addressed by the appointment of a truly independent commission, " Jefferson and Melancon concluded. CC -Rock, a native New Orleanian, veteran journalist and Katrina evacuee, is the new editor of the Bay View. Email her at campbellrock@.... About us [input] [input] [input] [input] [input] Search sfbayview.com [input] Search WWW Advertise in the Bay View! San Francisco Bay View National Black Newspaper 4917 Third Street San Francisco California 94124 Phone: (415) 671-0789 Fax: (415) 671-0316 Email: editor@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.