Reducing fine particulate air pollution cuts mortality risk

[Guest guest]

Reducing fine particulate air pollution cuts mortality risk

Investigators who extended the Harvard Six Cities fine particulate air

pollution study by eight years found that reduced levels of tiny particle

pollution during this period lowered mortality risk for participants.

The results appear in the second issue for March 2006 of the American

Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, published by the American

Thoracic Society.

The findings of the original Harvard Six Cities study (1979 to 1990)

revealed an association between levels of fine particulate matter pollution and

mortality risk. The new study, which was conducted from 1990 to 1998, reports

on

this later period of reduced air pollution concentration.

Francine Laden, Sc.D., of Channing Laboratory in Boston, Massachusetts, and

three associates found that the largest drops in adjusted mortality rates

were in cities with the greatest reduction in fine particulate air pollution

(PM2.5). The investigators' findings remained valid even after setting controls

for the general increase in adult life expectancy that occurred in the U.S.

during both study periods (1979 to 1989 and 1990 to 1998).

" This reduction was observed specifically for deaths due to cardiovascular

and respiratory disease and not from lung cancer, a disease with a longer

latency period and less reversibility, " said Dr. Laden.

The study population consisted of 8,096 white participants residing in

Watertown, Massachusetts; Kingston and Harriman, Tennessee; St. Louis, Missouri;

Steubenville, Ohio; Portage, Wyocena, and Pardeeville, Wisconsin; and Topeka,

Kansas. The average age of participants at the start of the original study was

50, with women comprising 55 percent of the cohort.

" Current smoking on enrollment ranged from 33 percent in Topeka and 40

percent in Watertown, and former smoking ranged from 21 percent in Harriman to

25

percent in both Topeka and Watertown, " said Dr. Laden.

The annual mean concentration of PM2.5 (fine particulate matter) declined

during the eight-year study period by 7 micrograms per cubic meter of air per

decade in Steubenville, 5 micrograms in St. Louis, 3 micrograms in Watertown,

2 micrograms in Harriman, 1 microgram in Portage and less than a microgram in

Topeka.

The improved mortality relative risk due to decreased PM2.5 during the

second study period, as compared to the first, was 0.73.

In an editorial on the article in the same issue of the journal, Bert

Brunekreef, Ph.D., of the Institute for Risk Assessment Science at the

Universiteit

Utrecht and the University Medical Center in Utrecht, The Netherlands,

wrote:

" The investigators show that the city-specific reduction of PM2.5 was

associated with a reduction in mortality rates. The reason why this is so

important

is that, until now, it was not clear whether the cohort studies were showing

effects that resulted from lifetime cumulative exposure. If so, late changes

in exposure would have little, if any, effect on survival. These new

findings suggest another dynamic--namely that recent exposures do matter. This

would

be consistent with pollution affecting primarily a dynamic " pool " of

susceptible individuals whose susceptibility itself may to some extent have

been i

ncreased by lifelong, cumulative pollution exposure. We do know that smoking

cessation leads to reductions in respiratory, cardiovascular and lung cancer

risks, with different lags. The findings in this study, which show no effect on

pollution reduction on lung cancer and the strongest effects on respiratory

and cardiovascular mortality reduction, seem to show a similar pattern. The

practical implication is that pollution reduction, even beyond the relatively

low levels that have been achieved in the past half-century, will lead to

public health benefits. "

Dr. Brunekreef also highlights the study's limitations: the size of the

study population was relatively small; some effects of clear medical importance

were not considered statistically significant; and the PM2.5 concentrations

during the second phase of the study were estimated. Moreover, because

participants in the last phase were not interviewed regularly, potential

variables--such as a change in smoking habits--may not be reflected in the

data. He

concluded that additional studies are needed.

###

Contact (for study): Roache, Office of Communications, Harvard

School of Public Health, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston,

Massachusetts 02115

Phone: (617) 432-6052

E-mail: croache@...

Contact (for editorial): Bert Brunekreef, Ph.D., Institute for Risk

Assessment Services, Universiteit Utretcht, P.O. Box 80178 3508

TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Phone: + 31 30 253 9494

E-mail: b.brunekreef@...