Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 == SPIN OF THE DAY == 1. BAD DATA, AND COMPROMISED LIMITS, ON CHROMIUM http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-chromium24feb24,1,7640 474.story?coll=la-news-a_section " This was a 10-year campaign to shape the science to fit the industry's agenda rather than shape the regulation to fit the science, " Professor s said of industry attempts to avoid lower exposure limits for hexavalent chromium. In 2004, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposed reducing the exposure limit set in 1943 more than fifty-fold. s and other researchers " obtained internal documents through an industry foundation's bankruptcy proceedings that showed the industry representatives were aware in 2002 of an elevated cancer risk. " They found that a study commissioned by the industry group Chrome Coalition, and carried out by ENVIRON, manipulated data to hide increased cancer risks at all but the highest exposure levels. Some 380,000 U.S. workers are exposed to chromium. An executive at the company Elementis Chromium denied an " orchestrated effort to hide anything, " but said the data " may have not been handled well. " OSHA finally set the new chromium exposure limit at one-tenth the old limit. SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, February 24, 2006 For more information or to comment on this story, visit: _http://www.prwatch.org/node/4505_ (http://www.prwatch.org/node/4505) 7. FINDING A CHEMICAL HARMLESS, FOR A FEE http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2006/feb/business/pt_weinberg. html In a April 2003 pitch to DuPont, The Weinberg Group proposed a strategy to help defuse the growing controversy over the health impacts of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a compound used to make Teflon. Weinberg's Vice-President of Product Defense, P.Terrence Gaffney, said, " DuPont must shape the debate at all levels. " One of his suggested strategies was to facilitate the " publication of papers and articles dispelling the alleged nexus between PFOA and teratogenicity as well as other claimed harm. " (Teratogenicity is used to describe the damaging effects of an agent on a fetus.) Gaffney also proposed to " develop 'blue ribbon panels' of thought leaders on issues related to PFOA " and to " coordinate the publishing of white papers on PFOA, junk science and the limits of medical monitoring. " DuPont confirmed to reporter D. Thacker that they had hired the Weinberg Group to help with " scientific third party experts, " probably on PFOA issues. SOURCE: Environmental Science and Technology, February 22, 2006 For more information or to comment on this story, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/node/4493 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.