Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Hi , Could it actually be a matter of both? Could it be the new manmade cellulose materiels used and the air tight manner in which homes are constructed to promote energy efficiency...are encouraging new, more dominent strains of fungi resultant of over use of fungicides to thrive within damp indoor environments? Could we have possibly created a monster and then set a feast on it's table? Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 snk1955@... wrote: > Hi , > > Could it actually be a matter of both? Could it be the new manmade cellulose materiels used and the air tight manner in which homes are constructed to promote energy efficiency...are encouraging new, more dominent strains of fungi resultant of over use of fungicides to thrive within damp indoor environments? Could we have possibly created a monster and then set a feast on it's > table? > > Sharon Yes indeed for the materials and pesticides, but the " airtight " concept is only incidental to the process - not " causative " for SBS as many people claim. Anybody who really wants to take charge of their exposures must get the " indoor Air Quality " idea completely out of their mindset. This stuff " is where it is " - as much outdoors as in. Just try living in a tent next to a " mold castle " and see how the badness fails to stay indoors like a " Indoor Air Quality " problem should. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.