Guest guest Posted December 30, 2005 Report Share Posted December 30, 2005 Nice if you are born with the right genetics, otherwise tough, unless someone figures out a practical and ethical workaround. Your ethics may vary, given time :-P cbwillis9 wrote: > http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/001140.html > Higher IL-10 levels > > Carol > > > > > > > > Note: This forum is for discussion of health related subjects but under no circumstances should any information published here be considered a substitute for personal medical advice from a qualified physician. -the owner > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 I see research implications having to do with supplementing IL-10, some blocking of TNF. You're welcome to elaborate on perceived ethics. Carol " nospam.rwp@d... " <nospam.rwp@d...> wrote: > Nice if you are born with the right genetics, otherwise tough, unless > someone figures out a practical and ethical workaround. Your ethics > may vary, given time :-P > > http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/001140.html > > Higher IL-10 levels > > > > Carol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 What you're talking about could apply to hormones or any drug. It takes a culture of misinformation to perpetrate widespread misuse, e.g. psych meds, but also a lot of patients giving away their power, not taking responsibility for their own learning including listening to their body, and not exploring more natural alternatives. Yes high risk abounds in the early stages of research and experiment. " Early adopter " mentalities will be the first to volunteer, the rest need not apply and can stand back in horror if they are so inclined. Where low hormone levels are at the root of diseases, I like a nutritional support approch if possible, but where not effective, then a hormone supplementation approach, rather than the other drugs with iatrogenic harm or alternative approaches that may not be effective. I predict low/high hormone levels will be found to be at the root of a vast number of diseases in which we don't currently think about hormone levels. (It's possible classical homeopathy could address some hormone levels, or in some cases, but I haven't seen consistent or stable results in this area.) Ultimately the ethics we need to be most concerned about are our own. For myself, I want healthcare options. I don't want someone else limiting my options due to present unknowns. Risks and unknowns just need to be stated - what I call " the ethics of adequate disclosure. " Carol Willis willis_protocols Article archive, blog, links. Not a discussion group > > > >> Nice if you are born with the right genetics, otherwise tough, unless > >> someone figures out a practical and ethical workaround. Your ethics > >> may vary, given time :-P > >> > > > > > > > >>> http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/001140.html > >>> Higher IL-10 levels > >>> > >>> Carol > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: This forum is for discussion of health related subjects but under no circumstances should any information published here be considered a substitute for personal medical advice from a qualified physician. -the owner > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.