Guest guest Posted November 16, 1995 Report Share Posted November 16, 1995 Mel Siff<Mcsiff@a... wrote: > ***Why is that Australia (and NZ) is devoting so much money and effort to > finding even the slightest faults with food supplements, a process which the > authorities seems to be pursuing with even more zeal than is the case with > pharmacological drugs?......... > > Something just seems a bit unfair and hypocritical about the whole business. > Maybe some of our Aussie pals on this list can fill in information from the > " horse's mouth " , so to speak......... > > While it is essential that the public be protected from the dangers of > both allopathic and complementary medicine, there is also an element of > overkill that can affect both types of healing. Are the authorities in > Australasia and other countries maintaining a fair and equal balance of > investigation and control that is commensurate with the actual number of proven > cases of 'herbal' and allopathic disasters? Apparently, the number of deaths > or serious side-effects associated with pharmacological agents in the West is > more than 100 times greater than with 'health' products, so the entire > situation seems to be somewhat out of balance. Too much posturing and too >little balance? > > How much influence is the power and wealth of the pharmacological industry exerting in trying to control the major public trend toward using complementary medicine nowadays? *** Australia recently saw the introduction of a value-added or goods and services tax (GST)and among the exemptions (there ought to be no exemptions in my view) was the area of health...or so I thought. Whilst prescription-only medicines were unaffected (e.g., ephedrine and AAS which from all accounts are notoriously difficult to obtain from a doctor - unless you are an elite athlete!) the price of everything from vitamins to creatine rose by the full 10%. (Though one protein bar actually fell in price, to my disbelief). Vested interest groups are a loud minority in this country and the pharmaceutical industry is no exception. One of my major beefs is that a number of drugs that are available over-the-counter in the US are 'demonized' in this country by a hungry media who is fed information by alleged experts. It seems that current affairs programs in Australia run a story every week concerning some or other health scare based on misinformation and anecdote. The industry lobbies government about the dangers of legalising pro-hormones and yet happily supplies literally shiploads of 'juice' to countries like Mexico (see the link below). Yet whilst all this is going on, the 'supplement' companies can make all sorts of outrageous claims concerning their products and the industry " watchdog " fails to even so much as raise an eyebrow! Claims like " turns fat into muscle " and other such biological alchemy still pop up from time to time. (If every supplement that I purchased lived up to the hype of its manufacturers I would almost certainly weigh 400 pounds at 0.5% bodyfat). The following article at http://www.theage.com.au/insight/steroids/entry.html sheds light on Australia's apparent hypocrisy. " Australia has become a leading supplier to the multi-million-dollar world steroid black market as a result of lax Federal Government export controls. This revelation comes despite the government's calls for an international crackdown on the use and trafficking of steroids, with penalties akin to narcotics offences. Official records obtained by Insight show that more than a quarter of Australian-made steroids are exported to Mexico, the centre of the black-market trade. Steroids are certified for export to Mexico by the Federal Government's National Registration Authority. The certificates guarantee the quality of steroids sent around the world. Officials involved in monitoring the industry confirm that the bulk of the more than 70,000 vials of steroids exported each year go to the illicit trade. They also say that some steroids marked for export never leave Australia, but are diverted to the local black market. " There are numerous other links on this page which are fascinating. Cheers, _______________________ Mavromatis Department of Economics Monash University AUSTRALIA _______________________ " The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. " Winston Churchill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2000 Report Share Posted November 15, 2000 Ron Law, a member of the New Zealand Ministry of Health working group advising the Director General of Health on mandatory medical error reporting, seems to be determined to 'nail' the health supplement business in Australasia. He lectures in management at the Auckland University of Technology and has a particular interest in evidence based regulation within the healthcare industry. His research of to date has revealed that, while there have been approximately 100,000 deaths in Australia and New Zealand over the past decade, there has only been one contested death due to complementary healthcare products. He is desperately seeking evidence to support the fact that Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration spends more than 10% of its entire budget regulating an industry with one of the lowest measurable risk profiles of all industries. An evidence based risk profile of 1/100,000 seems inordinately out of proportion to the 1/10 allocation of resource. Information derived from this web page: < http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/321/7270/1170#EL1> ***Why is that Australia (and NZ) is devoting so much money and effort to finding even the slightest faults with food supplements, a process which the authorities seems to be pursuing with even more zeal than is the case with pharmacological drugs?. Some of us may still remember on other discussion groups how a British fitness fanatic visited Australia about 2 years ago and was arrested at Customs for having a private bottle of prohormones which they doggedly refused to accept that he was not smuggling. The customs autocrats refused to accept evidence that those prohormones were readily available on the web from Aussie companies and they insisted on maintaining that this was a criminal case. It cost the Brit a few thousand pounds in legal fees and fines to stay out of an Aussie jail, but he now has criminal record and this will affect his ability to conduct future business in Australia. Yet, some Aussie athletes admitted publicly to using steroids and other illegal drugs, yet they still have no criminal records. I was there some years ago when some top Aussie coaches and athletes went on TV disclosing the names of others using banned ergogenic drugs, but nobody from all of that group ever ended up with criminal records. Something just seems a bit unfair and hypocritical about the whole business. Maybe some of our Aussie pals on this list can fill in information from the " horse's mouth " , so to speak. Lest some leap into the fray to state that this sort of thing happens in other countries, then let me immediately add that I fully agree. It is just that I felt that we should also comment on the situation in yet another part of the world without singling any one nation out as being better or worse. After all, we know in the USA that if you use marijuana and you don't inhale, even the highest government officials can get off scot free! A few months ago I provided the titles of books and news articles on drug scandals involving the entire Olympic movement, Eastern Germany and in the Olympic Games committees in several countries.(see our archives) While it is essential that the public be protected from the dangers of both allopathic and complementary medicine, there is also an element of overkill that can affect both types of healing. Are the authorities in Australasia and other countries maintaining a fair and equal balance of investigation and control that is commensurate with the actual number of proven cases of 'herbal' and allopathic disasters? Apparently, the number of deaths or serious side-effects associated with pharmacological agents in the West is more than 100 times greater than with 'health' products, so the entire situation seems to be somewhat out of balance. Too much posturing and too little balance? How much influence is the power and wealth of the pharmacological industry exerting in trying to control the major public trend toward using complementary medicine nowadays? Dr Mel C Siff Denver, USA mcsiff@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.