Guest guest Posted January 1, 2001 Report Share Posted January 1, 2001 For those of you who are interested in high altitude training, these websites may be useful. The swimming site below correctly points out that opinion on the benefits of high altitude training is very divided. Respected scientists, physiologists, coaches and athletes respectfully/disrespectfully agree/disagree on altitude training usefulness, physiological effects and individual response. Considerable research, countless papers and hundreds of thousands of observation hours by the brightest coaching minds in the world come to different conclusions. Some authorities feel that living at altitude and training at sea level is more effective, while others believe that the use of special hypoxic (limited oxygen) breathing devices is even better. Opinion also differs regarding whether altitude training is more useful for sprint or long distance athletes. Any comments on this topic would be appreciated. ALTITUDE TRAINING SITES <http://www.sportsci.org/traintech/altitude/wgh.html> <http://www.runningonline.com/zine/Training/133.sht> <http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/coachsci/vol24/table.htm> <http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/coachsci/vol54/table.htm> <http://www.rice.edu/~jenky/sports/altitude.html> <http://www4.nau.edu/hastc/> <http://home.sprynet.com/~holtrun/altitude.htm> <http://www.sportsmedicine.about.com/health/sportsmedicine/cs/altitude/> <http://www.swiminfo.com/articles/swimtechnique/articles/200001-01st_art.asp> (Swimming & Altitude) <http://www.hypoxico.com/12.html> (Hypoxic vs Altitude Training) <http://spot.colorado.edu/~gamow/research/rats.html> (Living at Altitude) <http://www.hypoxic-training.com/history.html> Dr Mel C Siff Denver, USA mcsiff@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2001 Report Share Posted April 1, 2001 Mel Siff<Mcsiff@a... >wrote: <For those of you who are interested in high altitude training, these websites may be useful. The swimming site below correctly points out that opinion on the benefits of high altitude training is very divided. Respected scientists, physiologists, coaches and athletes respectfully/disrespectfully agree/disagree on altitude training usefulness, physiological effects and individual response. Considerable research, countless papers and hundreds of thousands of observation hours by the brightest coaching minds in the world come to different conclusions. Some authorities feel that living at altitude and training at sea level is more effective, while others believe that the use of special hypoxic (limited oxygen) breathing devices is even better. Opinion also differs regarding whether altitude training is more useful for sprint or long distance athletes. Any comments on this topic would be appreciated. ALTITUDE TRAINING SITES <http://www.sportsci.org/traintech/altitude/wgh.html> <http://www.runningonline.com/zine/Training/133.sht> <http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/coachsci/vol24/table.htm> <http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/coachsci/vol54/table.htm> <http://www.rice.edu/~jenky/sports/altitude.html> <http://www4.nau.edu/hastc/> <http://home.sprynet.com/~holtrun/altitude.htm> <http://www.sportsmedicine.about.com/health/sportsmedicine/cs/altitude/> <http://www.swiminfo.com/articles/swimtechnique/articles/200001-01st_art.asp> (Swimming & Altitude) <http://www.hypoxico.com/12.html> (Hypoxic vs Altitude Training) <http://spot.colorado.edu/~gamow/research/rats.html> (Living at Altitude) <http://www.hypoxic-training.com/history.html> Dr Mel C Siff> Research done by Levine and Stray-Gundersen in 1997 has demonstrated the effectiveness of a training program aimed at improving 5000m times which includes training at medium altitudes (1250m) and training at high altitudes (2500m). The goal here was to permit certain adaptations to occur when living at high altitudes for a period of 4 weeks (increasing number of red blood cells, of muscle capillaristation, of myoglobine, of mitochondrial density and modification of enzymes) but at the same time, to allow high intensity training to continue since the latter is still done at sea level (as opposed to high-level training which forces the athlete to reduce intensity). Gains in VO2 max and lactic threshold were both significant and higher than in the two control groups (1- High- altitude living and training; 2- and sea level training and living). So what are we to conclude then? From this research, that high- altitude living combined to sea level training will give the best results and so, all the hypoxic devices (tents, tarped beds and even trailers!!!) that we are seeing many runners and X-country skiiers use might have some substance to it. But of course, that's according to this study... As Dr. Siff has noted, others have come up with the same results, while others have concluded quite differently... Lepine Ottawa, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.