Guest guest Posted December 4, 2000 Report Share Posted December 4, 2000 Dan Wagman writes: > To me, irrespective of what sport you're in, touching weights is fundamentally > meant to build strength. In terms of pure strength sports (e.g., > powerlifting, weightlifting) it's obvious that since the 1-RM is tested, > doing a bunch of reps (e.g., >5) is a bit senseless. Dan, I accept this logic completely. Let me take it to the extreme. Is it ever then logical to train for anything other than 1rm (with ofcourse room for variability for cycling,etc) in healthy, competitive, adult athletes? In other words, wouldn't our main, fundamental goal be 1rm always if you are training strength for any sport? As far as developing endurance on the field issue I agree, however, one consideration is that the weightlifting movements are so complete that one can get more work done, with full range of motion, and one can measure the work done easily. It also adds variety when complete specificity isn't a priority. Diego Crespo. by the way did the heading come out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2000 Report Share Posted December 4, 2000 In a message dated 12/4/00 11:15:25 PM, gladiadores@... writes: << Dan, I accept this logic completely. Let me take it to the extreme. Is it ever then logical to train for anything other than 1rm (with ofcourse room for variability for cycling,etc) in healthy, competitive, adult athletes? In other words, wouldn't our main, fundamental goal be 1rm always if you are training strength for any sport? >> Diego: I see you made some e-mail changes. Thanks for the added clarification. Regarding the above, as a powerlifter I often wondered about that; why not just train singles? On one hand, however, a competitive powerlifter, particularly one who intends to compete at the international level, must have a strong conditioning base. I say this because your lifting, including warm-ups, will be done in 3 hrs. So from that perspective, I personally felt that singles wouldn't provide sufficient conditioning as compared with maybe 3s to 5s. Also, there is something to be said regarding developing an ability to perform perfect technique on successive and immediate attempts. And regarding the application of strength training for athletes competing in sports other than strength sports, the same conditioning aspect of reps greater than singles would seem to apply. But beyond my personal opinion, and as it relates to competitive lifting, research would seem to suggest that the greatest strength gains are achieved at a rep range up to 5. I cannot overlook that in my personal training nor in discussions regarding strength training. Dan Wagman, Ph.D., C.S.C.S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.