Re: Organic vs. Biodynamic

[Guest guest]

thank you, Kathy & I love the omission/commission

comparison!

--- realfoodie2003 <realfoodie2003@...> wrote:

it's like sins of omission and commission

__________________________________________

DSL – Something to write home about.

Just $16.99/mo. or less.

dsl.

[Guest guest]

Thank you, that helps A LOT!

Tifanie

>

> From: " realfoodie2003 " <realfoodie2003@...>

> Date: 2006/01/04 Wed PM 11:58:06 GMT

>

> Subject: Organic vs. Biodynamic

>

> On occasion, I have explained this to various groups the following ways:

>

> elementary kids- organic and biodynamic don't have bad things in it, but

> biodynamic is more likely to have good things in it too.

>

> church groups- it's like sins of omission and commission, organic may be

> omitting some of what should be there but at least is not committing the

> offenses of using harmful products in the production of food, whereas

> biodynamic does not commit or omit.

>

> nutrition nuts like us- take meat or milk for example, it could be organic

even

> though the animal never saw a blade of grass in it's life as long as it was

fed

> organic grain and soybeans, even in confinement, where biodynamic would

> be free-range, grass-fed etc. which would mean that the products should

> actually contain the nutrients you would expect like omega-3's, CLA, etc.

>

> As you can see, there is a considerable area of crossover. I don't know what

> the specific criteria are for biodynamic. Hope this gives you a better idea.

>

> Kathy

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>