Guest guest Posted December 17, 2005 Report Share Posted December 17, 2005 As promised, updated, revised text is on the .com website. Luca Turin and others took issue with what I thought was a simple comment about what the process was in mainstream perfumery houses. Therefore, I simply have taken all reference to the male chemists and perfumers in mainstream perfumery out. Several of my colleagues asked me to emphasize other things, especially a bit more about our materials and art. I, in doing this, believe I have cleared up issues that Luca and a former disgruntled member of my group kept raising, libelously, that we use synthetics when we say lilac, violet flower, fruit, etc. I did post my reply on his blog about our doppelgangers, but it seemed to get lost. Or ignored. Repeatedly ;-) I can't post over there on his blog, as there seem to be technical or archival problems, if anyone has noticed today. So here are the links to the revised pages, if you care to keep up with this, lol: <http://www..com/faq.htm>http://www..com/faq.htm http://www..com/about.htm Actually, I'm quite happy for the feedback, minus the charge of being sexist; the writing is much more polished and professional now! Hey, what do y'all think of the phrase you'll find on those pages, as assisted by members of this group: " trompe-le-nez " (to fool the nose). It really is perfect for describing the violet flower, fruit, etc., that we work so hard to achieve without synthetics. Anya http://.com The premier site on the Web to discover the beauty of Natural Perfume / Join to study natural perfumery " The Age of the Foodie is passé. It is now the Age of the Scentie. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.