Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 Greetings, I am new here too, and VERY new to essential oils, but everything that I have read says that EO's should not be used undiluted on the skin. As someone with severe allergies to many things, I can certainly back up that doing so could cause problems. The greater the concentration, even for things that are not normally irritating, the greater the chance that someone will develop or have an allergic response to a substance. That being said, people have violent allergic reactions to therapeutic drugs, medicines, etc all the time that the regulatory bodies have approved of. I believe the thinking is that sensitivities and allergies are the problem of the person experiencing them since one can be allergic to most anything and the company cannot be expected to forsee that. If reactions are widespread, or serious, enough one would hope something would be done, but who knows. Kindest Regards, -- Don't we love to turn our little blue world, baby, upside down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 From: Gillian Fryer [mailto:gfryer@...] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 8:59 PM Subject: a commercial EO analgesic I haven't posted before, but I am on a lot of cosmetic-science-soap-herb related groups... I was surprised at the lack of response from another technical group so I wondered what you guy might think... I heard a radio ad for a patented EO analgesic blend and I looked at their website and then at their patent application. The product is called 024, <snipped for brevity> Hi Gillian, You will see in their patent application that aloe vera oil is the first ingredient (meaning that it is the largest quantity ingredient in the mix). Aloe vera oil is a carrier oil. What bothers me more is the fact that the patent application does not mention camphor at all . . . Which is usually avoided by we aromatherapists because of the high ketone content, and Japanese is usually *safrole* type. Not to mention the problem synthetic being sold as a real plant distillate in many cases. My botany information also tells me that sources are unsure of the botanical accuracy regarding the Japanese camphor. Since they don't mention actual proportions in the patent, it is difficult to tell what their concentration is, however, I would be curious to see the safety data that they publish for the consumer. Doesn't seem to be any on the website. I have a great problem with issuing patents for any combinations of plant-derived extracts that can be produced by anyone . . . The patenting of neem oil is but one case of indigenous populations being stripped of their rights to harvest and control the plants in their region. If you get LinkTV (http://www.linktv.com/), check out the special on family farms and the importance of getting food control (i.e.,plants of all kinds) back in the control of the people and not the corporations http://www.linktv.com/programming/programDescription.php4?code=active_farm This provocative documentary should move us all to activism. Back to Swissmedica's product . . . I also have a problem with the purported scientific research . . . One paper tested for 5 consecutive days, another for 3 months . . . Nowhere do I see any real information on possible long-term adverse affects or side affects. Swissmedica??? This is a Texas company. I could go on to rant about the US Patent Office, but I'll save that for another day. Be well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane, http://www.wingedseed.com " First of all, cultivate a contented spirit; a garden is a good place to begin. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:52:52 -0800, " Marcia Elston " <samara@...> wrote: > Swissmedica??? This is a Texas company. Texas??? Source of information? Just curious. -= ß =- _______________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 From: -= ß =- [mailto:baudecb1@...] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 9:04 PM Subject: Re: a commercial EO analgesic On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:52:52 -0800, " Marcia Elston " <samara@...> wrote: > Swissmedica??? This is a Texas company. Texas??? Source of information? Just curious. -= ß =- Sorry, patent application was from an individual in Texas, with assignee being General cosmetics NY . . . but, the company selling the product is in Candada. Sorry. Be well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane, http://www.wingedseed.com " First of all, cultivate a contented spirit; a garden is a good place to begin. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 > Sorry, patent application was from an individual in Texas, with > assignee being General cosmetics NY . . . but, the company selling the > product is in Candada. Sorry. Ah! Understood. That explains everything.Was not " cold fusion " discovered in Texas (and Utah) also? -= ß =- _______________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 ________________________________ From: -= ß =- [mailto:baudecb1@...] Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 4:41 AM Subject: Re: a commercial EO analgesic > Sorry, patent application was from an individual in Texas, with > assignee being General cosmetics NY . . . but, the company selling the > product is in Canada. Sorry. Ah! Understood. That explains everything. Was not " cold fusion " discovered in Texas (and Utah) also? -= ß =- Errrr . . . then discounted and buried in the desert, leading us to ever more dependency on fossil fuels? My cynical self seems to be in overdrive of late. No apology for that. Be well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane, http://www.wingedseed.com " First of all, cultivate a contented spirit; a garden is a good place to begin. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 At 07:13 PM 3/27/2005, you wrote: >Actually the patent lists a range of percentages. > >Aloe vera oil 10-18 % >Eucalyptus EO 0.5-5% >Lemon EO 05-5 % >Orange EO 0.5-5% >Peppermint EO 65-80% >Rosemary EO 2-10% >Calendula (listed elsewhere as Tagetes) EO up to 25% Hi Everyone: I thought maybe this discussion was going to veer into the subject of the scent of the product, to tie it into Natural Perfumery as a healing art, but all I'm seeing is a discussion on the patent and uniqueness and ethics of the process. is there something I'm missing? Still confused to the Calendula/Tagetes mixup. Is that the NP aspect? Anya http://anyamccoy.com " The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners. " -Ernst Jan Plugge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 Hi Marcia, Thanks for your research and reporting skills. I was wondering about the aloe oil as a possible carrier oil as welll but didn't know how to go about resarching it (without going out int the pouring rain today to a local Rite-Aid store or GNC) Thaks again for the info! Jane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 > > >Actually the patent lists a range of percentages. > > > >Aloe vera oil 10-18 % > >Eucalyptus EO 0.5-5% > >Lemon EO 05-5 % > >Orange EO 0.5-5% > >Peppermint EO 65-80% > >Rosemary EO 2-10% > >Calendula (listed elsewhere as Tagetes) EO up to 25% > > Hi Everyone: > I thought maybe this discussion was going to veer into the subject of the > scent of the product, to tie it into Natural Perfumery as a healing art, > but all I'm seeing is a discussion on the patent and uniqueness and ethics > of the process. is there something I'm missing? > > Anya Yeah, let's talk scent. Here is what is listed as ingredients on the 024 website: " Ingredients: Active Ingredient: Camphor 3.1% Inactive Ingredients: Peppermint Oil, Rosemary Oil, Aloe Vera Oil, Eucalyptus Oil, Lemon Oil, Orange Oil. " If the only " active ingredient " listed is Camphor at 3.1%, then I assume the rest of the ingredients listed as " inactive " are there for the scent or as a carrier. Aloe would be the carrier as mentioned in earlier posts. Camphor alone is a pretty strong nasal opening experience! One wouldn't want to smell of it alone so the addition of other oils to compliment and take the edge off makes sense. Citruses would raise the mood in accordance with Aromatherapy and Peppermint/Rosemary would energize,yes? Reminds me of an orange menthol coughdrop.... As to safety, there are safety warnings for each ingredient if it applies also listed very clearly on the website. If it works...great. SalonPas is an Asian sticky patch I use for pain occassionally and has camphor (2.6mg/100mg2) as an ingredient but without the citruses it smells very medicinal. Psychologically I like the " medicine " smell...but I'm odd! As for the Patent: I do patent searches alot for research on old items. They may not always match what the product may end up being. It;'s a claim on an idea. 65-80% peppermint? Not likely or it'd burn.... http://www.024zone.com/index.html Apasara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.