] Always learning . . . another question abou

[Guest guest]

Pete and , Thank you both for your replies. I had been using the wrong setting for the beats (although it seemed to produce positive outcomes anyway). Can't wait to see results with the "NEW" "IMPROVED" design. (Thanks, Jane, for asking this question. Always the questions I need the answers to!)

Maureen

Re: ] Always learning . . . >> another question about beats>>>> Pete,>> Whoa, I am really confused. I want to make sure I understand what >> you are saying: In the SMR% design, the first threshold (the one >> evaluating the ratio of SMR over total range) should be set to >> "increase." The second Threshold, (Threshold 2), binaural beats, >> which is set to "Auto Target, 40% success" should have the increase >> box UNchecked, therefore decreasing? Sorry, if I am getting too >> detailed, but I want to be sure I understand. Thank you for your help >> and your designs.>> Maureen>> Van Deusen> http://www.brain-trainer.com> 16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157> 305/251-0337 or (cellular) 305/321-1595>>>>>>

[Guest guest]

,

Good idea. Thanks.

Pete

>

> From: <gmartin@...>

> Date: 2005/03/25 Fri AM 07:49:09 EST

>

> Subject: Re: ] Always learning . . . another

question abou

Van Deusen

http://www.brain-trainer.com

16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157

305/251-0337 or (cellular) 305/321-1595

[Guest guest]

Maureen,

Actually I have changed the design to make the beats when SMR is above the threshold.

Because the beats worked as a feedback, and I could get better result this way. Try both ways and let us know which is better for you.

Jo Sato

-----Original Message-----From: Maureen McCarren [mailto:maur@...] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 10:23 PM Subject: Re: ] Always learning . . . another question abou

Pete and , Thank you both for your replies. I had been using the wrong settin g for the beats (although it seemed to produce positive outcomes anyway). Can't wait to see results with the "NEW" "IMPROVED" design. (Thanks, Jane, for asking this question. Always the questions I need the answers to!)

Maureen

Re: ] Always learning . . . >> another question about beats>>>> Pete,>> Whoa, I am really confused. I want to make sure I understand what >> you are saying: In the SMR% design, the first threshold (the one >> evaluating the ratio of SMR over total range) should be set to >> "increase." The second Threshold, (Threshold 2), binaural beats, >> which is set to "Auto Target, 40% success" should have the increase >> box UNchecked, therefore decreasing? Sorry, if I am getting too >> detailed, but I want to be sure I understand. Thank you for your help >> and your designs.>> Maureen>> Van Deusen> http://www.brain-trainer.com> 16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157> 305/251-0337 or (cellular) 305/321-1595>>>>>>

[Guest guest]

Jo,

I have tried the SMR with beats both ways now. One with the beats set at decrease and the other with the beats set on increase. My son has always been my most challenging "client." The montage set the way Pete designed it-with the beats set to decrease (they kick in when the client is below, to try and get him where he needs to be) has worked much better for my son. I am wondering now, can I use "beats" to encourage beta? And what would I set them for (of course at a different location on the head)? Also, now that I have used this on my son he hates those what-we-call "cricket sounds (beats)" and I have decreased the volumn, hoping it will not be consciously irritating to him, yet will still encourage his brain where it needs to go. Comments, Pete? (After all, it is your design.)

Maureen

Re: ] Always learning . . . >> another question about beats>>>> Pete,>> Whoa, I am really confused. I want to make sure I understand what >> you are saying: In the SMR% design, the first threshold (the one >> evaluating the ratio of SMR over total range) should be set to >> "increase." The second Threshold, (Threshold 2), binaural beats, >> which is set to "Auto Target, 40% success" should have the increase >> box UNchecked, therefore decreasing? Sorry, if I am getting too >> detailed, but I want to be sure I understand. Thank you for your help >> and your designs.>> Maureen>> Van Deusen> http://www.brain-trainer.com> 16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157> 305/251-0337 or (cellular) 305/321-1595>>>>>>

[Guest guest]

Maureen,

Thank you for letting me know the results. I think barely audible beats should work fine just like subliminal messages.

Jo

-----Original Message-----From: Maureen McCarren [mailto:maur@...] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 5:42 AM Subject: Re: ] Always learning . . . another question abou

Jo,

I have tried the SMR with beats both ways now. One with the beats set at decrease and the other with the beats set on increase. My son has always been my most challenging "client." The montage set the way Pete designed it-with the beats set to decrease (they kick in when the client is below, to try and get him where he needs to be) has worked much better for my son. I am wondering now, can I use "beats" to encourage beta? And what would I set them for (of course at a different location on the head)? Also, now that I have used this on my son he hates those what-we-call "cricket sounds (beats)" and I have decreased the volumn, hoping it will not be consciously irritating to him, yet will still encourage his brain where it needs to go. Comments, Pete? (After all, it is your design.)

Maureen

Re: ] Always learning . . . >> another question about beats>>>> Pete,>> Whoa, I am really confused. I want to make sure I understand what >> you are saying: In the SMR% design, the first threshold (the one >> evaluating the ratio of SMR over total range) should be set to >> "increase." The second Threshold, (Threshold 2), binaural beats, >> which is set to "Auto Target, 40% success" should have the increase >> box UNchecked, therefore decreasing? Sorry, if I am getting too >> detailed, but I want to be sure I understand. Thank you for your help >> and your designs.>> Maureen>> Van Deusen> http://www.brain-trainer.com> 16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157> 305/251-0337 or (cellular) 305/321-1595>>>>>>

[Guest guest]

Maureen,

There is a Beta % up with Leading Beats protocol in the package. This works to

bring down frequencies above a defined level and increase them when the peak

frequency is low. I would definitely change the target frequency to around 14

(I thinkk it's 21 Hz in the design), which you can do in the Expression

Evaluator on the Signal Diagram.

Remember you can set the carrier frequency of the beats (some clients like

200/214, for example, much better than 1200/1214). And you can reduce volume as

well. Swingle's work with beats suggested that they were actually more

effective when nearly subliminal.

Pete

>

> From: " Maureen McCarren " <maur@...>

> Date: 2005/04/05 Tue PM 04:41:47 EDT

> < >

> Subject: Re: ] Always learning . . . another

question abou

>

> I have tried the SMR with beats both ways now. One with the beats set at

decrease and the other with the beats set on increase. My son has always been

my most challenging " client. " The montage set the way Pete designed it-with the

beats set to decrease (they kick in when the client is below, to try and get him

where he needs to be) has worked much better for my son. I am wondering now,

can I use " beats " to encourage beta? And what would I set them for (of course at

a different location on the head)? Also, now that I have used this on my son he

hates those what-we-call " cricket sounds (beats) " and I have decreased the

volumn, hoping it will not be consciously irritating to him, yet will still

encourage his brain where it needs to go. Comments, Pete? (After all, it is your

design.)

> Maureen