Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 ~ You couldnt find it because it was on the BE list. I forwarded it on to the . ~ windowed squash > Pete gave a careful description of the squash (windowed squash?) > design in which all freq's are inhibited while a particular band > (e.g. SMR) is rewarded. Can anyone tell me where that message is? It > couldn't have been more than two weeks ago, yet I can't find it on > this list. > > SDC > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 See, I even checked a couple other lists,...just not the right one. Thanks. > ~ You couldnt find it because it was on the BE list. I forwarded it > on to the . > ~ > windowed squash > > > > Pete gave a careful description of the squash (windowed squash?) > > design in which all freq's are inhibited while a particular band > > (e.g. SMR) is rewarded. Can anyone tell me where that message is? It > > couldn't have been more than two weeks ago, yet I can't find it on > > this list. > > > > SDC > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 In a Windowed Squash protocol are we inhibiting everything around the window and reinforcing the range within the window, or are we ignoring the range within the window ? Ed Zahra Psychologist Greenwith South Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Ed, The idea behind a windowed squash is to inhibit what is problematic and allow the brain to take care of the rest. My experience using BioExplorer to play back sessions with the spectrum analyzer set to 3d and also looking at the numbers in BioReview is that there are clear increases in some of the areas left out of the squash, I generally leave 12-20 out and regularly see increased activity in those frequencies, I think this is an example of the brain's ability to regulate more efficiently if the " roadblocks " are taken care of., On Apr 12, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Ed Zahra wrote: > In a Windowed Squash protocol are we inhibiting everything around the > window and reinforcing the range within the window, or are we ignoring > the range within the window ? > > > > Ed Zahra > > Psychologist > > Greenwith > > South Australia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Thanks I do follow the theory but I guess I wasn’t clear that I’m stuck on the practical settings stuff. If I were to do the training on a BrainMaster, would I set the windowed range on GO or IGNORE? Ed -----Original Message----- From: [mailto:gmartin@...] Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2005 10:18 AM Subject: Re: Windowed Squash Ed, The idea behind a windowed squash is to inhibit what is problematic and allow the brain to take care of the rest. My experience using BioExplorer to play back sessions with the spectrum analyzer set to 3d and also looking at the numbers in BioReview is that there are clear increases in some of the areas left out of the squash, I generally leave 12-20 out and regularly see increased activity in those frequencies, I think this is an example of the brain's ability to regulate more efficiently if the " roadblocks " are taken care of., On Apr 12, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Ed Zahra wrote: In a Windowed Squash protocol are we inhibiting everything around the window and reinforcing the range within the window, or are we ignoring the range within the window ? Ed Zahra Psychologist Greenwith South Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Ignore. -----Original Message-----From: Ed Zahra [mailto:brained@...] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:12 PM Subject: RE: Windowed Squash Thanks I do follow the theory but I guess I wasn’t clear that I’m stuck on the practical settings stuff. If I were to do the training on a BrainMaster, would I set the windowed range on GO or IGNORE? Ed -----Original Message-----From: [mailto:gmartin@...] Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2005 10:18 AM Subject: Re: Windowed Squash Ed,The idea behind a windowed squash is to inhibit what is problematic and allow the brain to take care of the rest. My experience using BioExplorer to play back sessions with the spectrum analyzer set to 3d and also looking at the numbers in BioReview is that there are clear increases in some of the areas left out of the squash, I generally leave 12-20 out and regularly see increased activity in those frequencies, I think this is an example of the brain's ability to regulate more efficiently if the "roadblocks" are taken care of.,On Apr 12, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Ed Zahra wrote: In a Windowed Squash protocol are we inhibiting everything around the window and reinforcing the range within the window, or are we ignoring the range within the window ? Ed ZahraPsychologistGreenwithSouth Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Ed, The windowed range would be ignored On Apr 12, 2005, at 10:11 PM, Ed Zahra wrote: > Thanks > > > > I do follow the theory but I guess I wasn’t clear that I’m stuck on > the practical settings stuff. If I were to do the training on a > BrainMaster, would I set the windowed range on GO or IGNORE? > > > > Ed > > > > Re: Windowed Squash > > > > Ed, > > The idea behind a windowed squash is to inhibit what is problematic > and allow the brain to take care of the rest. My experience using > BioExplorer to play back sessions with the spectrum analyzer set to 3d > and also looking at the numbers in BioReview is that there are clear > increases in some of the areas left out of the squash, I generally > leave 12-20 out and regularly see increased activity in those > frequencies, I think this is an example of the brain's ability to > regulate more efficiently if the " roadblocks " are taken care of., > > > On Apr 12, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Ed Zahra wrote: > > In a Windowed Squash protocol are we inhibiting everything around the > window and reinforcing the range within the window, or are we ignoring > the range within the window ? > > > > Ed Zahra > > Psychologist > > Greenwith > > South Australia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.