Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Pete, One would normally have given up at this point. However, I press on for the sake of Jake. I think perhaps God gave me a tough case so I would dig deeper. Had I solved all of Jake's issues by now, I wouldn't have learned as much as I have (thanks to all of you). Instead, maybe I would have moved on to the next conquest. Now, I find myself more and more interested in the field. Today I get to see the report on the SPECT. Hopefully the QEEG report will arrive today also. Should be interesting. Jake is a trouper letting Dad learn from him. I instigated the training to be held in Indianapolis April 20-24. I hope we get enough interest so you can make it happen. I'll have Jake show up when appropriate and you can help me assess him. I look forward to meeting you. Regards, Tim Fishel --------------------------- Origonal Message ------------------------------- Message: 13 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 5:05:38 -0500 From: Van Deusen <pvdtlc@...> Subject: Jakes training Tim wrote: 1) Jake has had over 120 sessions of EEG NFB (SMR reward/Theta Inhibit), so I have been mulling on the idea of giving nIR-HEG a crack. I was hoping for the Pendant version to get released soon, as it is more in line with my current budget. But, I also just had a QEEG done on (full report is in the mail) which will give me the data to map out a better training plan. My current plan is to do the EEG with DVD for reward. 2) The other issue is control struggles (as you put it). I usually refer to it as the ability to motivate Jake. Pete: In what other field might we go blasting along for 120 sessions and seeing no results? This is the reason I believe so strongly in assessing a client FIRST and testing promising protocols FIRST before applying a recipe and just assuming it would work if only the client would really try. If all brains responded to the old chestnut of SMR at C4, life would be as simple as if all infections responded to penicillin. As for motivation, almost all clients begin with a capital of hope when we start training. The biggest cost of the recipe approach is that we can easily squander that capital in 10-20 sessions if the client sees nothing happen. To me, anyone who has done 120 sessions (unless in prison or being paid serious cash per session) has demonstrated remarkable motivation--especially if the client has seen no real effect to all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.