Guest guest Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 Dotty, he might be right, but I don't think its up to the LAW to recognize fear and suffering, its up to a jury. Fear of cancer is a VERY legitimate tort because it is very expensive to maintain the level of healthcare in which you can do cancer monitoring. I have read in several papers that people who have been exposed to toxic mold should be monitored regularly for cancer. Also, many emplyers now do a health screen with database providers which reveals if a person has made major insurance claims. So your health situation can and OFTEN does prevent you from getting a good job (with health insurance.) And one's health situation makes you uninsurable via non-group insurance. I have read hundreds of stories about people losing jobs because of health insurance issues, so even if your health is okay, the cost of insuring someone with a history of illness drives many businesses away from hiring them. To be on the safe side, many businesses only hire younger, (under 35) healthy looking people these days. If mold destroys your leptin receptors you can easily find yourself struggling with weigt issues. If you are also over 35, that is two strikes against you, add mold illness's direct effects and the threat of other illnesseses like cancer and you begin to realize why these toxins are used in warfare. They DO kill. And they go on killing for a long time.. They also destroy parts of your brain and nervous system. Luckily, from what I have read, it is mostly 'white matter', not grey. But that is still very important to your health, esp. your nerves and your autonomous nervous system.. There may be cures -SOMEDAY- but there aren't any cures for most of this that I am aware of, NOW, and there may never be, or more likely, the COST of these cures may put them out of reach to the VAST majority of people (like 99.999999999999%) of the millions of people mld has surely effected.. And for most, they also will often arrive to late to prevent the damages, deaths, etc. Dont forget, for each one who gets to sue, thousands fall through the cracks in the system. But since landlords, builders, etc. are on 'the honor system' and SUING IS THE ONLY SANCTION THAT THEY FACE when they ignore their tenants/customers, etc. health for financial gain, taking a gamble that they will not be caught.. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SYSTEM THAT ANY WHO CAN, DO SUE. Here is what Dr. Schaller says on his site: ______begin paste from Dr. Schaller's website_______ www.personalconsult.com Cancer and Mold Toxins: Another Way Indoor Mold Harms Humans Dr. Wang and Groopman from the Environmental Health Sciences Department at s Hopkins, published a useful article on the effects of mold toxins on DNA published in Mutation Research -- a leading cancer journal. They said clearly: Mycotoxins are toxic fungal metabolites which are structurally diverse, common contaminants of the ingredients of animal feed and human food. To date, mycotoxins with carcinogenic potency in experimental animal models include aflatoxins, sterigmatocystin, ochratoxin, fumonisins, zearalenone, and some Penicillium toxins. Most of these carcinogenic mycotoxins are genotoxic agents with the exception of fumonisins, which is currently believed to act by disrupting the signal transduction pathways of the target cells. Aflatoxin B1 [is] a category I known human carcinogen and the most potent genotoxic agent, is mutagenic in many model systems and produces chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, sister chromatid exchange, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and chromosomal strand breaks, as well as forms adducts in rodent and human cells....More strikingly, the relationship between aflatoxin exposure and development of human hepatocellular carcinoma ... was demonstrated by [other ] studies... Mutat Res. 1999 Mar 8;424(1-2):167-81. Aflatoxin Found In Human Breast Cancer Tissue on et al. (1993) examined human breast cancer tissue for evidence of the presence of aflatoxin, a recognized potent carcinogenic mycotoxin. The researchers examined human DNA from a variety of tissues and organs to identify and quantify aflatoxin DNA-adducts. Such adducts are considered to be proof of the mycotoxin's presence in a particular tissue. (These researchers had already proved the value of this method in the detection of aflatoxin-DNA adducts in tissue from a case of acute aflatoxin poisoning in Southeast Asia.) DNA from normal and tumorous tissue obtained from patients with cancer of the breast was examined. Tumor tissues had higher aflatoxin-adduct levels than did normal tissue from the same individual. The result of this study is that it verifies the presence of carcinogenic aflatoxin within the cancer tissue and thus implicates aflatoxin as a cause of breast cancer. Cyclosporin (A Mycotoxin) Causes Breast Cancer In Humans Cyclosporin is a fungal derived drug. It is classified as a mycotoxin in the mycology literature (Betina [1989]). 1. Vogt et al. (1990) reported the occurrence of de novo malignant tumors occurring in 598 renal transplant recipients who were immunosupressed with cyclosporin. Eighteen of 598 patients receiving their first renal graft along with cyclosporin treatment between 1981 and 1986 developed a malignancy at a mean interval of 33 months. The cyclosporin-induced cancers included breast cancer. 2. Escribano-Patino et al. (1995) reported the occurrence of breast cancer as a complication of cyclosporin use in their series of kidney transplant recipients. 3. Penn and First (1986) reported 88 tumors in eighty-seven organ transplant recipients after the use of cyclosporin. Malignancies appeared an average of 14 months after the cyclosporin treatment. There was a surprising frequency of endocrine-related malignancies (ovarian, testicular and breast) among these malignancies. Aflatoxin Induces Malignant Changes In Human Breast Cells Eldridge et al. (1992) noted that some environmental chemicals are stored in human breast fat which are documented to be rodent mammary carcinogens. These researchers stressed the importance of determining the cancer potential of environmental agents in this key target tissue. An assay was developed for detecting cancer potential using cultures of normal human breast epithelial cells derived from 5 different women. A positive response was observed with aflatoxin. The conclusion of this study was that aflatoxin causes normal human breast cells to become cancerous. Could Moldy Cheese Causes Breast Cancer? One sample study is by Le et al. (1986), in a French case-control study of 1,010 breast cancer cases and 1,950 controls with nonmalignant diseases, found that breast cancer was found to be associated with increased frequency of mold-fermented cheese consumption. Oxalic Acid (A Mycotoxin) Found In Breast Cancer Lesions Going et al. (1990) found that weddellite (calcium oxalate) crystals are present in calcifications found in the breast tissue of patients with breast cancer. Calcium oxalate crystals are formed when calcium binds with oxalic acid. In human and animal systems, this is a protective process which considerably reduces the severe toxicity of oxalic acid. Oxalic acid is a powerful corrosive agent and oxalate salts are widely used for their cleaning and bleaching properties! Oxalic acid happens to be a mycotoxin which can be produced by a number of different fungal species. Some fungi produce such large amounts of oxalic acid that they are used for commercial production of the chemical. Aspergillus niger fungal infection in human lungs produces large amounts of oxalic acid which is extremely toxic to the blood vessels and which may cause fatal pulmonary hemorrhages. Consequently, oxalic acid (calcium oxalate crystals) in the sputum or lung specimens of patients is also an indication of an Aspergillus infection of the lung. These calcium oxalate crystals are the same as the calcium oxalate found in breast cancers. The presence of oxalates in the breast is indicative of the presence of fungi interwoven within the stages of breast cancer development. Since humans do not make oxalic acid themselves, this is an appropriate conclusion. Breast Oxalate Calcifications In Mammograms et al. (1993) examined calcifications found in breast mammograms and evaluated their relationship to the risk of subsequent breast cancer. The presence, morphology, and distribution of calcifications visualized on baseline mammograms of 686 women who developed breast cancer over a 7- to 10-year follow-up period were compared with those of 1,357 controls who remained cancer free. It was found that there was a significant correlation between such calcifications and subsequent development of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Calcifications Decrease With Tamoxifen (Antifungal) Treatment and Georgian- (1994) reported the regression of breast cancer in four patients who had been treated with tamoxifen. The patients were closely monitored with physical examination and mammography for a minimum of 2 years. In all cases, the features of malignancy which were seen on mammograms regressed. These results were documented by a decrease in the number of calcifications and in the size of spiculated masses. These results suggest that these breast calcifications are dynamic in nature, being able to regress as effective treatment reduces the cancer. Comment The presence of oxalate calcifications in the breasts of virtually every patient with breast cancer, and their subsequent regression as a result of treatment with the antifungal agent tamoxifen, points to the strong possibility that there is a fungal role in this cancer. There have even been reports of fungal cells growing out of cancer cells. The existence of a viable fungal sub-forms--with its DNA co-mixed with a human's own DNA--could well explain the bizarre appearance of the DNA in cancer cells. Support for such a " science fiction " type scenario is found in the observation that a lectin staining procedure, used to find " invisible " fungi in tissue specimens, happens to identify breast cancer cells. Normal cells do not stain with these same lectin staining procedures. The lectin stain is also taken up by strange multinucleated giant cells which suggests that these cells may, in fact, be fungal cells. This could explain the presence of oxalates in breast cancer tissue, a metabolite produced by fungi and not by humans. It might also help explain how breast cancer is caused by a number of fungal-fermented foods, particularly those made with Baker's or Brewer's Yeast (both being Saccharomyces cerevisiae), known producers of uric acid which degrades to oxalic acid (Costantini [1989]). Baker's yeast is used to make bread, a documented cause of breast cancer in Japanese women. Brewer's yeast is used to make many alcoholic beverages, all of which are known to cause breast cancer in every country where the connection has been investigated, a fact which is well documented. Other research some feel beer and wine mycotoxins increase breast cancer above chance. T-2 Toxin Causes Breast Tumors Schoental et al. (1979) reported that breast cancers were induced in rats which were dosed with T-2 Toxin. T-2 Toxin is a Fusarium toxin frequently found in the human food chain. The fact that T-2 Toxin induced breast cancer in an animal model is most significant, for this cancer occurs so often in humans. Furthermore, antibodies against Fusarium fungi are frequently found in human blood. These fungi and their toxins are the most frequently encountered contaminants found in animal feed and human foods. See also Saito (1971) and Corrado (1971), both of whom induced breast cancer in mice using moldy rice and its extracts. Ochratoxin Causes Breast Tumors Fibroadenomas in the mammary gland were found in over half of a group of female mice which were dosed with ochratoxin (Boorman [1988]). In humans, fibroadenoma is a documented risk factor for breast cancer (Dupont et al. [1994]). Ochratoxin Causes Breast Fibroadenomas Huff (1991) investigated the carcinogenicity of ochratoxin, a naturally occurring mycotoxin of the fungal genera Aspergillus and Penicillium, which was studied in three strains of mice and in one strain of rats. It was found that fibroadenomas of the mammary glands were induced by ochratoxin administration. In humans, fibroadenoma is a documented long-term risk factor for breast cancer (Dupont et al. [1994]). Penicillic Acid/Patulin Cause Breast Adenomas And Breast Sarcomas Penicillic acid was found to induce mammary adenomas, as well as local sarcomas and fibrosarcomas in mice and rats. Patulin was also reported to cause mammary adenomas in mice and rats (Dickens and [1965], Dickens [1967]). See also Ciegler et al. (1971). Verrucarin Induced Breast Tumors Jodczyk (1984) was able to induce breast tumors in mice by exposing them to a derivative of the mycotoxin verrucarin E. Moldy Rice Extract Causes Breast Cancer Mammary cancers (breast cancers) were induced by feeding an alcohol extract of moldy rice to animals (Corrado [1971]). See also Saito (1971). This is hardly a complete presentation of this topic, but it is merely offered to allow reflection on the troubling action of some mycotoxins. I would like to thank the editorial research of three World Health Organization Scholars for the sample references above: A.V. COSTANTINI, M.D. Head, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center For Mycotoxins In Food HEINRICH WIELAND, M.D. Medical Director, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center For Mycotoxins in Food LARS 1. QVICK, M.D., Ph.D. Co-Medical Director, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center For Mycotoxins In Food I APPRECIATE THEIR WORK, AND CAN NEITHER SUPPORT NOR OPPOSE THEIR FINDINGS. PLEASE REVIEW THEM WITH THE LAWYERS IN THE LEGISLATURE, JUDICIARY AND YOUR LOCAL TRAIL LAWYER'S, TO LEARN WHAT IS GOOD & ALLOWABLE MEDICAL CARE FOR YOU. AND YOU MIGHT WANT TO RUN IT BY SOME UP-TO-DATE PHYSICIANS. www.personalconsult.com Note: Reading this article assumes you have read the informed consent on this site. Never self-treat based on this article. Always consult licensed medical and mental health practitioners. ______end of excerpt from website________ On 1/6/06, dottykalm <dottykalm@...> wrote: > I guess I am one with one of those " frivolous mold > lawsuits " After nearly ruining my health, and my > financial security that I have worked for all my > life, I guess I don't have much of a case. My current > attorney thinks he is too big into abestos claims, to > handle mold claims. I spent over 80,000 out of pocket > expenses to remediate the mold and rebuild my condo > enough to sell it. I was so sick that I had to quit > my job. But, I don't have much of a case. This > attorney always reminds me that he has dying abestos > clients that take priority. Any advice here? > > " Judi, I remind you of my dying clients to explain in > context my schedule as i did when you asked me to take > over your case. I have won over 1 million dollars in > mold settlements in th elast year as a side job. I > told you it was a small part of my practice and that > unless they settled it would be a long time. The judge > just reduced a 150,000 pain and suffering award to > 50,000 because he said it was too high. If you are > hoping this case will solve your finacial problems > then you are setting yourself up for a fall. RI does > not recognize " fear of cancer " as a compensable damage > in a case. If you are displeased with me, then you > will not hurt my feelings. i have turned down over 35 > mold cases in 4 months. I believe in your case but you > have to understand reality. Why did the very > experienced mediator, Bob Parillo, who is well > respected and married to a judge state that our demand > of 150,000 was way too high when you thought it as too > low and the defense offered 12,000? > Fwd: [ToxicMoldSurvivors] LATEST SCIENTIFIC > ARTICLES---Molds / Mycotoxins and Human Injury > > I don't understand why you don't think I have much of > a case. I am concerned that you feel that way, > because if you feel that way, I don't know how you can > fight for me. You keep mentioning your dying > clients.....well, I could be in an earlier stage of > dying because of that condo board. > > > > > __________________________________________ > DSL – Something to write home about. > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > dsl. > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 Can you get another lawyer? You should start looking around, even if you decide not to.. He may be right.. You have to decide what you can live with.. It could take a long time.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 How exactly would you be monitored for cancer. It could start anywhere in the body & you can't xray everything. Loni LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: Dotty, he might be right, but I don't think its up to the LAW to recognize fear and suffering, its up to a jury. Fear of cancer is a VERY legitimate tort because it is very expensive to maintain the level of healthcare in which you can do cancer monitoring. I have read in several papers that people who have been exposed to toxic mold should be monitored regularly for cancer. Also, many emplyers now do a health screen with database providers which reveals if a person has made major insurance claims. So your health situation can and OFTEN does prevent you from getting a good job (with health insurance.) And one's health situation makes you uninsurable via non-group insurance. I have read hundreds of stories about people losing jobs because of health insurance issues, so even if your health is okay, the cost of insuring someone with a history of illness drives many businesses away from hiring them. To be on the safe side, many businesses only hire younger, (under 35) healthy looking people these days. If mold destroys your leptin receptors you can easily find yourself struggling with weigt issues. If you are also over 35, that is two strikes against you, add mold illness's direct effects and the threat of other illnesseses like cancer and you begin to realize why these toxins are used in warfare. They DO kill. And they go on killing for a long time.. They also destroy parts of your brain and nervous system. Luckily, from what I have read, it is mostly 'white matter', not grey. But that is still very important to your health, esp. your nerves and your autonomous nervous system.. There may be cures -SOMEDAY- but there aren't any cures for most of this that I am aware of, NOW, and there may never be, or more likely, the COST of these cures may put them out of reach to the VAST majority of people (like 99.999999999999%) of the millions of people mld has surely effected.. And for most, they also will often arrive to late to prevent the damages, deaths, etc. Dont forget, for each one who gets to sue, thousands fall through the cracks in the system. But since landlords, builders, etc. are on 'the honor system' and SUING IS THE ONLY SANCTION THAT THEY FACE when they ignore their tenants/customers, etc. health for financial gain, taking a gamble that they will not be caught.. IT IS IMPERATIVE TO THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SYSTEM THAT ANY WHO CAN, DO SUE. Here is what Dr. Schaller says on his site: ______begin paste from Dr. Schaller's website_______ www.personalconsult.com Cancer and Mold Toxins: Another Way Indoor Mold Harms Humans Dr. Wang and Groopman from the Environmental Health Sciences Department at s Hopkins, published a useful article on the effects of mold toxins on DNA published in Mutation Research -- a leading cancer journal. They said clearly: Mycotoxins are toxic fungal metabolites which are structurally diverse, common contaminants of the ingredients of animal feed and human food. To date, mycotoxins with carcinogenic potency in experimental animal models include aflatoxins, sterigmatocystin, ochratoxin, fumonisins, zearalenone, and some Penicillium toxins. Most of these carcinogenic mycotoxins are genotoxic agents with the exception of fumonisins, which is currently believed to act by disrupting the signal transduction pathways of the target cells. Aflatoxin B1 [is] a category I known human carcinogen and the most potent genotoxic agent, is mutagenic in many model systems and produces chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, sister chromatid exchange, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and chromosomal strand breaks, as well as forms adducts in rodent and human cells....More strikingly, the relationship between aflatoxin exposure and development of human hepatocellular carcinoma ... was demonstrated by [other ] studies... Mutat Res. 1999 Mar 8;424(1-2):167-81. Aflatoxin Found In Human Breast Cancer Tissue on et al. (1993) examined human breast cancer tissue for evidence of the presence of aflatoxin, a recognized potent carcinogenic mycotoxin. The researchers examined human DNA from a variety of tissues and organs to identify and quantify aflatoxin DNA-adducts. Such adducts are considered to be proof of the mycotoxin's presence in a particular tissue. (These researchers had already proved the value of this method in the detection of aflatoxin-DNA adducts in tissue from a case of acute aflatoxin poisoning in Southeast Asia.) DNA from normal and tumorous tissue obtained from patients with cancer of the breast was examined. Tumor tissues had higher aflatoxin-adduct levels than did normal tissue from the same individual. The result of this study is that it verifies the presence of carcinogenic aflatoxin within the cancer tissue and thus implicates aflatoxin as a cause of breast cancer. Cyclosporin (A Mycotoxin) Causes Breast Cancer In Humans Cyclosporin is a fungal derived drug. It is classified as a mycotoxin in the mycology literature (Betina [1989]). 1. Vogt et al. (1990) reported the occurrence of de novo malignant tumors occurring in 598 renal transplant recipients who were immunosupressed with cyclosporin. Eighteen of 598 patients receiving their first renal graft along with cyclosporin treatment between 1981 and 1986 developed a malignancy at a mean interval of 33 months. The cyclosporin-induced cancers included breast cancer. 2. Escribano-Patino et al. (1995) reported the occurrence of breast cancer as a complication of cyclosporin use in their series of kidney transplant recipients. 3. Penn and First (1986) reported 88 tumors in eighty-seven organ transplant recipients after the use of cyclosporin. Malignancies appeared an average of 14 months after the cyclosporin treatment. There was a surprising frequency of endocrine-related malignancies (ovarian, testicular and breast) among these malignancies. Aflatoxin Induces Malignant Changes In Human Breast Cells Eldridge et al. (1992) noted that some environmental chemicals are stored in human breast fat which are documented to be rodent mammary carcinogens. These researchers stressed the importance of determining the cancer potential of environmental agents in this key target tissue. An assay was developed for detecting cancer potential using cultures of normal human breast epithelial cells derived from 5 different women. A positive response was observed with aflatoxin. The conclusion of this study was that aflatoxin causes normal human breast cells to become cancerous. Could Moldy Cheese Causes Breast Cancer? One sample study is by Le et al. (1986), in a French case-control study of 1,010 breast cancer cases and 1,950 controls with nonmalignant diseases, found that breast cancer was found to be associated with increased frequency of mold-fermented cheese consumption. Oxalic Acid (A Mycotoxin) Found In Breast Cancer Lesions Going et al. (1990) found that weddellite (calcium oxalate) crystals are present in calcifications found in the breast tissue of patients with breast cancer. Calcium oxalate crystals are formed when calcium binds with oxalic acid. In human and animal systems, this is a protective process which considerably reduces the severe toxicity of oxalic acid. Oxalic acid is a powerful corrosive agent and oxalate salts are widely used for their cleaning and bleaching properties! Oxalic acid happens to be a mycotoxin which can be produced by a number of different fungal species. Some fungi produce such large amounts of oxalic acid that they are used for commercial production of the chemical. Aspergillus niger fungal infection in human lungs produces large amounts of oxalic acid which is extremely toxic to the blood vessels and which may cause fatal pulmonary hemorrhages. Consequently, oxalic acid (calcium oxalate crystals) in the sputum or lung specimens of patients is also an indication of an Aspergillus infection of the lung. These calcium oxalate crystals are the same as the calcium oxalate found in breast cancers. The presence of oxalates in the breast is indicative of the presence of fungi interwoven within the stages of breast cancer development. Since humans do not make oxalic acid themselves, this is an appropriate conclusion. Breast Oxalate Calcifications In Mammograms et al. (1993) examined calcifications found in breast mammograms and evaluated their relationship to the risk of subsequent breast cancer. The presence, morphology, and distribution of calcifications visualized on baseline mammograms of 686 women who developed breast cancer over a 7- to 10-year follow-up period were compared with those of 1,357 controls who remained cancer free. It was found that there was a significant correlation between such calcifications and subsequent development of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Calcifications Decrease With Tamoxifen (Antifungal) Treatment and Georgian- (1994) reported the regression of breast cancer in four patients who had been treated with tamoxifen. The patients were closely monitored with physical examination and mammography for a minimum of 2 years. In all cases, the features of malignancy which were seen on mammograms regressed. These results were documented by a decrease in the number of calcifications and in the size of spiculated masses. These results suggest that these breast calcifications are dynamic in nature, being able to regress as effective treatment reduces the cancer. Comment The presence of oxalate calcifications in the breasts of virtually every patient with breast cancer, and their subsequent regression as a result of treatment with the antifungal agent tamoxifen, points to the strong possibility that there is a fungal role in this cancer. There have even been reports of fungal cells growing out of cancer cells. The existence of a viable fungal sub-forms--with its DNA co-mixed with a human's own DNA--could well explain the bizarre appearance of the DNA in cancer cells. Support for such a " science fiction " type scenario is found in the observation that a lectin staining procedure, used to find " invisible " fungi in tissue specimens, happens to identify breast cancer cells. Normal cells do not stain with these same lectin staining procedures. The lectin stain is also taken up by strange multinucleated giant cells which suggests that these cells may, in fact, be fungal cells. This could explain the presence of oxalates in breast cancer tissue, a metabolite produced by fungi and not by humans. It might also help explain how breast cancer is caused by a number of fungal-fermented foods, particularly those made with Baker's or Brewer's Yeast (both being Saccharomyces cerevisiae), known producers of uric acid which degrades to oxalic acid (Costantini [1989]). Baker's yeast is used to make bread, a documented cause of breast cancer in Japanese women. Brewer's yeast is used to make many alcoholic beverages, all of which are known to cause breast cancer in every country where the connection has been investigated, a fact which is well documented. Other research some feel beer and wine mycotoxins increase breast cancer above chance. T-2 Toxin Causes Breast Tumors Schoental et al. (1979) reported that breast cancers were induced in rats which were dosed with T-2 Toxin. T-2 Toxin is a Fusarium toxin frequently found in the human food chain. The fact that T-2 Toxin induced breast cancer in an animal model is most significant, for this cancer occurs so often in humans. Furthermore, antibodies against Fusarium fungi are frequently found in human blood. These fungi and their toxins are the most frequently encountered contaminants found in animal feed and human foods. See also Saito (1971) and Corrado (1971), both of whom induced breast cancer in mice using moldy rice and its extracts. Ochratoxin Causes Breast Tumors Fibroadenomas in the mammary gland were found in over half of a group of female mice which were dosed with ochratoxin (Boorman [1988]). In humans, fibroadenoma is a documented risk factor for breast cancer (Dupont et al. [1994]). Ochratoxin Causes Breast Fibroadenomas Huff (1991) investigated the carcinogenicity of ochratoxin, a naturally occurring mycotoxin of the fungal genera Aspergillus and Penicillium, which was studied in three strains of mice and in one strain of rats. It was found that fibroadenomas of the mammary glands were induced by ochratoxin administration. In humans, fibroadenoma is a documented long-term risk factor for breast cancer (Dupont et al. [1994]). Penicillic Acid/Patulin Cause Breast Adenomas And Breast Sarcomas Penicillic acid was found to induce mammary adenomas, as well as local sarcomas and fibrosarcomas in mice and rats. Patulin was also reported to cause mammary adenomas in mice and rats (Dickens and [1965], Dickens [1967]). See also Ciegler et al. (1971). Verrucarin Induced Breast Tumors Jodczyk (1984) was able to induce breast tumors in mice by exposing them to a derivative of the mycotoxin verrucarin E. Moldy Rice Extract Causes Breast Cancer Mammary cancers (breast cancers) were induced by feeding an alcohol extract of moldy rice to animals (Corrado [1971]). See also Saito (1971). This is hardly a complete presentation of this topic, but it is merely offered to allow reflection on the troubling action of some mycotoxins. I would like to thank the editorial research of three World Health Organization Scholars for the sample references above: A.V. COSTANTINI, M.D. Head, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center For Mycotoxins In Food HEINRICH WIELAND, M.D. Medical Director, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center For Mycotoxins in Food LARS 1. QVICK, M.D., Ph.D. Co-Medical Director, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center For Mycotoxins In Food I APPRECIATE THEIR WORK, AND CAN NEITHER SUPPORT NOR OPPOSE THEIR FINDINGS. PLEASE REVIEW THEM WITH THE LAWYERS IN THE LEGISLATURE, JUDICIARY AND YOUR LOCAL TRAIL LAWYER'S, TO LEARN WHAT IS GOOD & ALLOWABLE MEDICAL CARE FOR YOU. AND YOU MIGHT WANT TO RUN IT BY SOME UP-TO-DATE PHYSICIANS. www.personalconsult.com Note: Reading this article assumes you have read the informed consent on this site. Never self-treat based on this article. Always consult licensed medical and mental health practitioners. ______end of excerpt from website________ On 1/6/06, dottykalm wrote: > I guess I am one with one of those " frivolous mold > lawsuits " After nearly ruining my health, and my > financial security that I have worked for all my > life, I guess I don't have much of a case. My current > attorney thinks he is too big into abestos claims, to > handle mold claims. I spent over 80,000 out of pocket > expenses to remediate the mold and rebuild my condo > enough to sell it. I was so sick that I had to quit > my job. But, I don't have much of a case. This > attorney always reminds me that he has dying abestos > clients that take priority. Any advice here? > > " Judi, I remind you of my dying clients to explain in > context my schedule as i did when you asked me to take > over your case. I have won over 1 million dollars in > mold settlements in th elast year as a side job. I > told you it was a small part of my practice and that > unless they settled it would be a long time. The judge > just reduced a 150,000 pain and suffering award to > 50,000 because he said it was too high. If you are > hoping this case will solve your finacial problems > then you are setting yourself up for a fall. RI does > not recognize " fear of cancer " as a compensable damage > in a case. If you are displeased with me, then you > will not hurt my feelings. i have turned down over 35 > mold cases in 4 months. I believe in your case but you > have to understand reality. Why did the very > experienced mediator, Bob Parillo, who is well > respected and married to a judge state that our demand > of 150,000 was way too high when you thought it as too > low and the defense offered 12,000? > Fwd: [ToxicMoldSurvivors] LATEST SCIENTIFIC > ARTICLES---Molds / Mycotoxins and Human Injury > > I don't understand why you don't think I have much of > a case. I am concerned that you feel that way, > because if you feel that way, I don't know how you can > fight for me. You keep mentioning your dying > clients.....well, I could be in an earlier stage of > dying because of that condo board. > > > > > __________________________________________ > DSL – Something to write home about. > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > dsl. > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 Specialized blood tests.. Imaging like MRI, etc. *Its expensive..* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 I am already looking around. It has been now 3 years since the original lawsuit was filed. The present attorney has constantly reminded me that I am not dying (yet), so this mold case is small change for him. He didn't tell me that when he took my case from another attorney either. But apparently now, he thinks mold cases are too expensive or too hard to prove. In fact he said it would only be a year and a half. Fear of cancer is only one of my complaints. I also lost 80,000 which I shouldn't have had to pay because of a condo board was criminally negligent. They also slandered me and told the neighbors I was crazy. I had to quit my good job, they almost ruined my life. --- LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: > Can you get another lawyer? You should start looking > around, even if > you decide not to.. > > He may be right.. You have to decide what you can > live with.. It could > take a long time.. > > > __________________________________________ DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 All VERY good points. Very good nes. But he is being businesslike, from his perspective. He probably thinks you wouldn't win in a jury trial. Well, YOU have to make the decision if you want to keep going. You may win, or you may end up with nothing. Can you get a second opinion? Do more research on what has happened in similar situations? He does not have the right to force you to settle. I don't think. and if you *really* want to go on, probably - almost surely, you need another lawyer- What would be involved with that? Maybe you can get somebody who is a bit more comitted to the cause? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 Who is this attorney that seems to be so arrogant? I'd like to have his informaton so that I can keep it in my files. KC --- In , dottykalm <dottykalm@y...> wrote: > > I guess I am one with one of those " frivolous mold > lawsuits " After nearly ruining my health, and my > financial security that I have worked for all my > life, I guess I don't have much of a case. My current > attorney thinks he is too big into abestos claims, to > handle mold claims. I spent over 80,000 out of pocket > expenses to remediate the mold and rebuild my condo > enough to sell it. I was so sick that I had to quit > my job. But, I don't have much of a case. This > attorney always reminds me that he has dying abestos > clients that take priority. Any advice here? > > " Judi, I remind you of my dying clients to explain in > context my schedule as i did when you asked me to take > over your case. I have won over 1 million dollars in > mold settlements in th elast year as a side job. I > told you it was a small part of my practice and that > unless they settled it would be a long time. The judge > just reduced a 150,000 pain and suffering award to > 50,000 because he said it was too high. If you are > hoping this case will solve your finacial problems > then you are setting yourself up for a fall. RI does > not recognize " fear of cancer " as a compensable damage > in a case. If you are displeased with me, then you > will not hurt my feelings. i have turned down over 35 > mold cases in 4 months. I believe in your case but you > have to understand reality. Why did the very > experienced mediator, Bob Parillo, who is well > respected and married to a judge state that our demand > of 150,000 was way too high when you thought it as too > low and the defense offered 12,000? > Fwd: [ToxicMoldSurvivors] LATEST SCIENTIFIC > ARTICLES---Molds / Mycotoxins and Human Injury > > I don't understand why you don't think I have much of > a case. I am concerned that you feel that way, > because if you feel that way, I don't know how you can > fight for me. You keep mentioning your dying > clients.....well, I could be in an earlier stage of > dying because of that condo board. > > > > > __________________________________________ > DSL – Something to write home about. > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > dsl. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 I am going in in the next 2 weeks for this type of testing- I will post how much it costs- I am very concerned about cancer --- In , LiveSimply <quackadillian@g...> wrote: > > Specialized blood tests.. Imaging like MRI, etc. > > *Its expensive..* > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 My heart goes out to you and your struggle to regain health- I am sure moving to the sun was a good choise- this summer definitly healed me as much as cholestramine. It is hard to loose everything and try to rebuild your life- having been sick for over 10 years - I feel I lost my last youthfull years and hope now to have a few healthy years . The threat of cancer weighs on me also. Good luck Thanks for > > saying that. That is my opinion as well. > > He thinks he is really something, and just taking my > > case for charity or something. His name is > > Deaton, from Early, Ludgwick & Sweeney, out of New > > Haven, Ct. I made a big mistake in changing > > attorneys > > to a so called " mold expert. " Now he is not > > interested...to small for him. > > > > Hey send him the post about the people in CA who > > got a settlement of 22.6 million. > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in > > hardcover > > Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > DSL – Something to write home about. > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > dsl. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.