Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 In '97, Banta of Sacramento based Restoration Consultants told me that there is not a single house that is completely free of Stachy. In '98 Cornell did a study that found significant Stachy in one out of five large buildings in a study of several hundred buildings ACCOMPANIED by people with known symptoms of reactivity to mold. Whatever the numbers are - it's a lot! And impossible to completely eradicate down to the last spore. So my aim is not to avoid mold based upon " testing " , it is to stay on the upside of the " immune power curve of exposure " to a ubiquitous irritant. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 I wonder if this research along with stats came from a study that PathCon Laboratories out of Atlanta did. If that is the case, don't believe one word of any of their information. They work in connection with the CDC, which is right down the road from them by the way. If you look to see who PathCon Labs has employed you will find that the majority has worked, or trained for the CDC or Emory University. You might as well throw WebMD in there too. Unqualified professionals...... Actually, only around > >>2% of homes tested for mold have stachybotrys. You need to have > >>really high humidity (~80%) for stachy to start growing, its not > >>a normal situation. > >> > >>Its higher (the percentage of moldy houses) for the others.. But > >>not all molds are toxic, and there are big variations in how > >>toxic they are. > >> > >>If you have stachy or aspergilus/penicillium, the chances are > >>high that you have a seious problem. Chaetmonium, Alternaria and > >>a few others are also neurotoxic, carcinogenic, etc. > >> > >>(but not as bad, it seems, life-ruining wise) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 --- In , " erikmoldwarrior " <erikmoldwarrior@e...> wrote: , what part of the country was this study done in? What age were the buildings? Is this a published study, I would like to read it. Bobbie > > In '97, Banta of Sacramento based Restoration Consultants told me > that there is not a single house that is completely free of Stachy. > In '98 Cornell did a study that found significant Stachy in one out of > five large buildings in a study of several hundred buildings > ACCOMPANIED by people with known symptoms of reactivity to mold. > Whatever the numbers are - it's a lot! > And impossible to completely eradicate down to the last spore. > > So my aim is not to avoid mold based upon " testing " , it is to stay on > the upside of the " immune power curve of exposure " to a ubiquitous > irritant. > - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Thank you for that. I appreciate it. I'm not a babe in the woods, but clearly, don;t know a lot of this stuff.. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 It wasn't my intention to insult you, so I hope you didn't take it that way. The bad info is just so insidious, and so carefully dolled up to look like authoritative fact, that it takes a lot of work to unravel all the bs. (I didn't unravel it myself, either. Haven't got that many hours in the day, or that much brains in play. I've had a lot of help, and still learning.) LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: Thank you for that. I appreciate it. I'm not a babe in the woods, but clearly, don;t know a lot of this stuff.. Thank you. Serena There is no such thing as an anomaly. Recheck your original premise. ...Ayn Rand, paraphrased --------------------------------- DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 " picbobd " wrote: > , what part of the country was this study done in? What age were the buildings? Is this a > published study, I would like to read it. > > Bobbie As I recall - it was in the southwest and the buildings were all fairly new. I read it in Time magazine which I still have in my old papers - buried in storage. Not definitive enough to dig it out. The most dangerous misconception people have is trying to project conditions which might be likely to be toxigenic wastedumps and make plans according. I've been slamdunked in Vegas and had a WONDERFUL time in Florida. Some of the newest buildings are the absolute worst. Trying to conceive of which conditions may cause places to be toxic and using these ideas as a guide will drive you crazy. " It is where it is " Perceive - evacuate - decontaminate! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.