Guest guest Posted October 31, 2005 Report Share Posted October 31, 2005 You're totally kidding me, right? Of all the hundreds of chemical polllutants contained in the factories that ringed Lake Ponchartrain alone - and they test for ONE and declare it safe?!! Oh pu-leeze. This reminds me of the ACOEM study on damp indoor spaces. Find one favorable study done under the most limited conditions, then announce that you have all the answers and studiously ignore any information to the contrary. I'm tempted to put together a new press release - " Brain Fog and Indigestion Found to be Induced by Government Double-speak " ... A newly published study reveals that neurotoxins such as the trichothecenes formerly thought to induce cognitive problems actually do not have any effect on victims of long-term exposure. In fact, clinical depression and various digestive ailments such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome were found to be greatly reduced in the absence of government-funded studies. " It appears that the act of trying to mentally track through the multintudinous layers of non-sequiturs and faulty logic, combined with triple-compound sentences of dubious beginning veracity induces a kind of profound stupor which is popularly referred to as 'brain fog'. " An additional study on nystagmus (the involuntary horizontal twitching of the eyeballs) is also under way. It is thought that visually attempting to track back and forth through government press releases, combined with the attempt to keep one's eyebrows from merging with one's hairline in disbelief and horror is the real culprit. The act creates a kind of overwhelming motor signal in the brain and may even lead to vertigo. Sufferers are advised to avoid websites and news stations carrying government information of most types, or to at least remain seated until the feelings of nausea and dizziness have passed. Unauthenticated reports of mylagia settling into the gluteals have also been rumored, but no new studies are planned at this time as no funding has been found. snk1955@... wrote: " Meanwhile, on Oct. 20 public health officials said at an _Institute of Medicine (IOM)_ (http://www.iom.edu/) conference that, currently, the greatest potential threat to human health in the wake of the hurricanes may be exposure to mold. They also expressed concerns about the toxicity of the sediments coating formerly flooded areas, especially in New Orleans. " <PUBDT>Octob<PUB Volume 83, Number 44 p. 8 Hurricane Aftermath <TI>Checking For To No tainted runoff found in Gulf; concerns focus on sediments left by floods _<AU>Cheryl H_ (http://pubs.acs.org/cen/staff/chbio.html) Gulf of mexico waters thus far appear free of chemical contaminants that could have been washed from the land by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, state and federal scientists report. A. Murawski, a senior scientist for the _National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration_ (http://www.nasa.gov/) , says federal and state agencies are sampling Gulf waters to determine whether the two hurricanes swept pollutants from land into coastal waters. Water samples analyzed thus far contain no toxic chemicals attributable to runoff following the hurricanes, he says. As part of their analyses, scientists are checking coastal waters from eastern Texas to Alabama for the presence of brominated flame retardants, which Murawski says is an indicator of “acute urban runoff.†Thus far, scientists have detected none of these brominated compounds in Gulf waters, he says. It is likely, therefore, that the low levels of pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls found in the water did not come from the storm surges, Murawski adds. Meanwhile, on Oct. 20 public health officials said at an _Institute of Medicine (IOM)_ (http://www.iom.edu/) conference that, currently, the greatest potential threat to human health in the wake of the hurricanes may be exposure to mold. They also expressed concerns about the toxicity of the sediments coating formerly flooded areas, especially in New Orleans. Among IOM conference speakers was J. Lioy, a professor at _ Wood Jo hnson Medical School_ (http://rwjms.umdnj.edu/) , Piscataway, N.J., who has extensively studied health effects stemming from the World Trade Center attacks, including ailments linked to dusts that coated building interiors. Noting that sediments dry out and can end up as airborne dust, Lioy urged officials to analyze the sediments as soon as possible. “Know what’s in there,†he said, so returning residents and workers doing demolition and cleanup can be told how to protect themselves appropriately. Chemical & Engineering News ISSN 0009-2347 Copyright © 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2005 Report Share Posted October 31, 2005 Unfortunately we do have the truth on our side. I could probably look back at the archives at the mcs site when the 9/11 incident happened and you would find that everyone was talking about how so many people were going to be sick from chemicals and everything else. Too bad so many had to suffer when they didn't report the air was bad for the firefighters and the people of NY. Now so many of them are ill. Now we know that the same thing is going to happen in NO and the so many places that have flooded. It is so hard to watch this happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.