Re: Good News about Aldosterone Levels

[Guest guest]

Please print my article on the evolution of PA to everyone who saw him but

missed the obvious diagnosis as long as the K has been low.

**************************************

See AOL's top rated recipes

(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Guest guest]

Sounds like they found the golden tumor and got it out. Congratulations

CE Grim MD

**************************************

See AOL's top rated recipes

(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Guest guest]

Even more for the land fill. If it isn't in the BMJ (and sometimes

even then) it will be classed as NIH (not invented here) and likely

to be filed in the container under the specialist's desk.

I don't think this is the way to go but am speaking from experience.

I have sent numerous copies of the article to the UK endocrinologists

annual conference that takes place every February at Peebles Hydro

Hotel. I am only about 70 miles from there so make a point of giving

out my brochure and Dr Grim's paper. I know most end up in the trash

basket but maybe the constant drip will eventually get through.

There is no excuse for any endo in the UK not to have had at least

one copy of these papers.

Helen in Scotland.

>

> Please print my article on the evolution of PA to everyone who saw

him but

> missed the obvious diagnosis as long as the K has been low.

>

>

>

> **************************************

> See AOL's top rated recipes

> (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I wonder if there are copyright restictions on anything newer? I

don't know, just a wild guess. But it also explains why you haven't

seen anything in print from my endo and do not know of him.

Around one article a year is hardly a huge pile of literature is it?

Helen

>

> Stimulated by Helen-as usual- I pubmeded PA in the BMJ and obtained

42

> articles from 1955-1994. Interesting that nothing newer.

>

>

> They can all be read for free from PUBMED fyi.

>

> Many of the articles I had know but some new ones of great

historical

> interest to me.

>

> As it is in the BMJ it must be true!

>

> Thanks again Helen.

>

>