Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 People with a lot of weight to lose (50-100 pounds or more) often have a very large lean mass. There are a couple of reasons. The biggie is that when your % body fat is that high, the readings are very, very inaccurate. So, just because someone (supposedly) has 140 pounds of lean mass when they weigh 210 doesn't mean they will still have it when they weigh 160. It's partly because the readings are funky, partly because lean mass includes water weight, and partly because the body puts on a lot of muscle to support the weight of the added body fat. So, when these people lose lean mass, it doesn't necessarily mean they're losing muscle. Their original lean mass estimates could have been way off. They could have dropped a lot of bloat and excess water weight. Or, lastly and least likely, they could have actually lost some muscle. BUT, that's not necessarily a bad thing. If you're no longer carrying around 100 extra pounds, you don't need all that lean mass to support your extra weight. Keeping the extra muscle is great, especially if you intend to compete in bodybuilding (think Pam Brown). Not everybody wants to be that muscular though, in which case it's ok to lean out a little. Ernst & Robin Castle: Lean Mass? I'm browsing the bodychangers website listening to interviews, and there is a woman named Ernst who says her ultimate goal is to weigh 115 pounds. If I remember correctly, didn't she start with a lean mass of 130 pounds? If that is true, isn't 115 pounds an unrealistic goal " unless " she loses muscle? http://www.bodychangers.com/eernst_inter.shtml If someone starts with a certain lean muscle mass shouldn't there total weight be heavier than their lean mass or at least in that range? I'm trying to determine if I should reevaluate my goal weight? There is another woman also on the bodychangers by the name of Robin Castle who has a lean mass of 150 pounds. Couldn't she get away with 160 pounds and still look great once she reaches her goal?. I wish I had that much lean mass. http://www.bodychangers.com/rcastle_inter.shtml Thanks, Tia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting mass? However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my lean mass lowers or will that remain the same > People with a lot of weight to lose (50-100 pounds or more) often have a very > large lean mass. There are a couple of reasons. The biggie is that when your % > body fat is that high, the readings are very, very inaccurate. So, just because > someone (supposedly) has 140 pounds of lean mass when they weigh 210 doesn't > mean they will still have it when they weigh 160. It's partly because the > readings are funky, partly because lean mass includes water weight, and partly > because the body puts on a lot of muscle to support the weight of the added body > fat. > > So, when these people lose lean mass, it doesn't necessarily mean they're losing > muscle. Their original lean mass estimates could have been way off. They could > have dropped a lot of bloat and excess water weight. Or, lastly and least > likely, they could have actually lost some muscle. BUT, that's not necessarily a > bad thing. If you're no longer carrying around 100 extra pounds, you don't need > all that lean mass to support your extra weight. Keeping the extra muscle is > great, especially if you intend to compete in bodybuilding (think Pam Brown). > Not everybody wants to be that muscular though, in which case it's ok to lean > out a little. > > > > > Ernst & Robin Castle: Lean Mass? > > > I'm browsing the bodychangers website listening to interviews, and > there is a woman named Ernst who says her ultimate goal is to > weigh 115 pounds. If I remember correctly, didn't she start with a > lean mass of 130 pounds? If that is true, isn't 115 pounds an > unrealistic goal " unless " she loses muscle? > > http://www.bodychangers.com/eernst_inter.shtml > > If someone starts with a certain lean muscle mass shouldn't there > total weight be heavier than their lean mass or at least in that > range? I'm trying to determine if I should reevaluate my goal weight? > > There is another woman also on the bodychangers by the name of Robin > Castle who has a lean mass of 150 pounds. Couldn't she get away with > 160 pounds and still look great once she reaches her goal?. I wish I > had that much lean mass. > > http://www.bodychangers.com/rcastle_inter.shtml > > Thanks, Tia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 She may not have had 130 pounds of lean mass to begin with. Or she may have dropped 15 pounds of water weight along the way. She would have to re-evaluate how much lean mass she actually has once she's near her goal and the readings are more accurate. The number she started with doesn't really mean anything 60 or 70 pounds later. Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass at that height would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny linebacker. :-) I'm 5'8 " and I only have 115 pounds of lean mass even with all my buggy muscles and turbo metabolism. So, no, her drop in lean mass doesn't seem drastic or unrealistic to me. Think about bodybuilders who switch to fitness (Kim Chivesky, Mia Finnegan). They drop pounds of muscle intentionally to achieve a different look. I think it's more of a personal decision about how you want your body to look than something unrealistic or dangerous. The only time I would freak is if someone already had a low lean mass for their height and wanted to lose more, like 99 lbs of lean mass on a 5'8 " frame. I had that once, and I wanted to be thinner! Duh! :-) Your strength levels won't necessarily change if your lean mass decreases. Lean mass is too many other things besides muscle (bone, skin, teeth, water, internal organs). You could get a haircut and technically, that's lost lean mass. Because lean mass readings are fairly inaccurate, you kind of have to guess on your protein. I actually go by one gram per pound of *total* body weight (or more). At 135-140 lbs, I usually eat 140-160g of protein. If someone has a lot of weight to lose, I would probably have them go by one gram of protein per pound of their goal weight. You kind of have to see how you feel and how your body responds though. Re: Ernst & Robin Castle: Lean Mass? Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting mass? However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 says, " Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass at that height would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny linebacker. :-) I have to disagree completely. I workout at Gold's Gym and see women 5'2-5'3 with 130-150 pounds of lean mass who don't look any where near " freakish " or like a " linebacker " . That statement is not only stereotypical but assumes that all women are built the same. Ethnicity, body shape, and a variety of other factors will determine what a woman who is 5'2 with 130 pound lean mass will look like. My sister-in-laws personal trainer is 5'3 and has 140 pounds lean mass and doesn't look overly muscular at all. > She may not have had 130 pounds of lean mass to begin with. Or she may have > dropped 15 pounds of water weight along the way. She would have to re-evaluate > how much lean mass she actually has once she's near her goal and the readings > are more accurate. The number she started with doesn't really mean anything 60 > or 70 pounds later. > > Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass at that height > would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny linebacker. :-) > I'm 5'8 " and I only have 115 pounds of lean mass even with all my buggy muscles > and turbo metabolism. So, no, her drop in lean mass doesn't seem drastic or > unrealistic to me. Think about bodybuilders who switch to fitness (Kim Chivesky, > Mia Finnegan). They drop pounds of muscle intentionally to achieve a different > look. I think it's more of a personal decision about how you want your body to > look than something unrealistic or dangerous. The only time I would freak is if > someone already had a low lean mass for their height and wanted to lose more, > like 99 lbs of lean mass on a 5'8 " frame. I had that once, and I wanted to be > thinner! Duh! :-) > > Your strength levels won't necessarily change if your lean mass decreases. Lean > mass is too many other things besides muscle (bone, skin, teeth, water, internal > organs). You could get a haircut and technically, that's lost lean mass. > > Because lean mass readings are fairly inaccurate, you kind of have to guess on > your protein. I actually go by one gram per pound of *total* body weight (or > more). At 135-140 lbs, I usually eat 140-160g of protein. If someone has a lot > of weight to lose, I would probably have them go by one gram of protein per > pound of their goal weight. You kind of have to see how you feel and how your > body responds though. > > > > > Re: Ernst & Robin Castle: Lean Mass? > > > Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds > lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't > there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes > unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting mass? > > However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough > protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I > hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows > me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my > lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 I'm a 5'2 1/2 Latina, current hourglass figure, and have set a goal of 15% body fat and a lean mass between 120-135 pounds. My body has slimmed and streamlined in a very feminine way and there is absolutely nothing super freaky about my appearance. I'm confident that maintaining a lean mass of 130 pounds would be just as feminine. Of course my breasts will decrease, but I definitely don't feel I'll look like a linebacker. Comments like these are the reason so many women are afraid to lift weights. First of all, only a woman on steroids lifting weights is going to look super freaky. I think this comment is based more on personal opinion than fact. I'd look for women who are short with 130 pounds lean muscle before accepting the opinion of someone who claims it won't be attractive. -- In , kiki8_2002 <no_reply@y...> wrote: > says, " Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of > lean mass at that height would make you a little super freak indeed. > We're talking tiny linebacker. :-) > > I have to disagree completely. I workout at Gold's Gym and see > women 5'2-5'3 with 130-150 pounds of lean mass who don't look any > where near " freakish " or like a " linebacker " . That statement is not > only stereotypical but assumes that all women are built the same. > > Ethnicity, body shape, and a variety of other factors will determine > what a woman who is 5'2 with 130 pound lean mass will look like. My > sister-in-laws personal trainer is 5'3 and has 140 pounds lean mass > and doesn't look overly muscular at all. > > > > She may not have had 130 pounds of lean mass to begin with. Or she > may have > > dropped 15 pounds of water weight along the way. She would have to > re-evaluate > > how much lean mass she actually has once she's near her goal and > the readings > > are more accurate. The number she started with doesn't really mean > anything 60 > > or 70 pounds later. > > > > Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass at > that height > > would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny > linebacker. :-) > > I'm 5'8 " and I only have 115 pounds of lean mass even with all my > buggy muscles > > and turbo metabolism. So, no, her drop in lean mass doesn't seem > drastic or > > unrealistic to me. Think about bodybuilders who switch to fitness > (Kim Chivesky, > > Mia Finnegan). They drop pounds of muscle intentionally to achieve > a different > > look. I think it's more of a personal decision about how you want > your body to > > look than something unrealistic or dangerous. The only time I would > freak is if > > someone already had a low lean mass for their height and wanted to > lose more, > > like 99 lbs of lean mass on a 5'8 " frame. I had that once, and I > wanted to be > > thinner! Duh! :-) > > > > Your strength levels won't necessarily change if your lean mass > decreases. Lean > > mass is too many other things besides muscle (bone, skin, teeth, > water, internal > > organs). You could get a haircut and technically, that's lost lean > mass. > > > > Because lean mass readings are fairly inaccurate, you kind of have > to guess on > > your protein. I actually go by one gram per pound of *total* body > weight (or > > more). At 135-140 lbs, I usually eat 140-160g of protein. If > someone has a lot > > of weight to lose, I would probably have them go by one gram of > protein per > > pound of their goal weight. You kind of have to see how you feel > and how your > > body responds though. > > > > > > > > > > Re: Ernst & Robin > Castle: Lean Mass? > > > > > > Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds > > lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't > > there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes > > unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting > mass? > > > > However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough > > protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I > > hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows > > me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my > > lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 I don't know how familiar everyone is with abcbodybuildin.com, but there are women on that site who are incredibly strong, with 120-130 pounds of lean muscle, and short, who look very sleek, slim and sexy. Check out their women's forum: http://abcbodybuilding.com/ DON'T WORRY ABOUT BULK AND GETTING SUPER FREAKISHLY HUGE LADIES....BELIEVE ME, IT'S NOT THAT EASY TO DO UNLESS YOU'RE USING STEROIDS. Who cares whether you weigh 115 pounds or 140 pounds at 5'2 if you look the way you want to look. FP > > > She may not have had 130 pounds of lean mass to begin with. Or > she > > may have > > > dropped 15 pounds of water weight along the way. She would have > to > > re-evaluate > > > how much lean mass she actually has once she's near her goal and > > the readings > > > are more accurate. The number she started with doesn't really > mean > > anything 60 > > > or 70 pounds later. > > > > > > Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass > at > > that height > > > would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny > > linebacker. :-) > > > I'm 5'8 " and I only have 115 pounds of lean mass even with all my > > buggy muscles > > > and turbo metabolism. So, no, her drop in lean mass doesn't seem > > drastic or > > > unrealistic to me. Think about bodybuilders who switch to fitness > > (Kim Chivesky, > > > Mia Finnegan). They drop pounds of muscle intentionally to > achieve > > a different > > > look. I think it's more of a personal decision about how you want > > your body to > > > look than something unrealistic or dangerous. The only time I > would > > freak is if > > > someone already had a low lean mass for their height and wanted > to > > lose more, > > > like 99 lbs of lean mass on a 5'8 " frame. I had that once, and I > > wanted to be > > > thinner! Duh! :-) > > > > > > Your strength levels won't necessarily change if your lean mass > > decreases. Lean > > > mass is too many other things besides muscle (bone, skin, teeth, > > water, internal > > > organs). You could get a haircut and technically, that's lost > lean > > mass. > > > > > > Because lean mass readings are fairly inaccurate, you kind of > have > > to guess on > > > your protein. I actually go by one gram per pound of *total* body > > weight (or > > > more). At 135-140 lbs, I usually eat 140-160g of protein. If > > someone has a lot > > > of weight to lose, I would probably have them go by one gram of > > protein per > > > pound of their goal weight. You kind of have to see how you feel > > and how your > > > body responds though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Ernst & Robin > > Castle: Lean Mass? > > > > > > > > > Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 > pounds > > > lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. > Isn't > > > there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it > becomes > > > unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting > > mass? > > > > > > However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating > enough > > > protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I > > > hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass > allows > > > me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as > my > > > lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 Pam Brown has a lean mass of about 140 pounds so she probably weighs close to 150 but she wears a size 4. That is incredible in my book. Keep in mind that pam's most recent photos are when she was at her lowest fat percentage and competing professionally. Normally she isn't that muscular but still maintains a lean mass over 130 pounds and stands 5'5.--- > She may not have had 130 pounds of lean mass to begin with. Or she may have > dropped 15 pounds of water weight along the way. She would have to re-evaluate > how much lean mass she actually has once she's near her goal and the readings > are more accurate. The number she started with doesn't really mean anything 60 > or 70 pounds later. > > Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass at that height > would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny linebacker. :-) > I'm 5'8 " and I only have 115 pounds of lean mass even with all my buggy muscles > and turbo metabolism. So, no, her drop in lean mass doesn't seem drastic or > unrealistic to me. Think about bodybuilders who switch to fitness (Kim Chivesky, > Mia Finnegan). They drop pounds of muscle intentionally to achieve a different > look. I think it's more of a personal decision about how you want your body to > look than something unrealistic or dangerous. The only time I would freak is if > someone already had a low lean mass for their height and wanted to lose more, > like 99 lbs of lean mass on a 5'8 " frame. I had that once, and I wanted to be > thinner! Duh! :-) > > Your strength levels won't necessarily change if your lean mass decreases. Lean > mass is too many other things besides muscle (bone, skin, teeth, water, internal > organs). You could get a haircut and technically, that's lost lean mass. > > Because lean mass readings are fairly inaccurate, you kind of have to guess on > your protein. I actually go by one gram per pound of *total* body weight (or > more). At 135-140 lbs, I usually eat 140-160g of protein. If someone has a lot > of weight to lose, I would probably have them go by one gram of protein per > pound of their goal weight. You kind of have to see how you feel and how your > body responds though. > > > > > Re: Ernst & Robin Castle: Lean Mass? > > > Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds > lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't > there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes > unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting mass? > > However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough > protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I > hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows > me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my > lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2002 Report Share Posted December 30, 2002 She sure does and looks fabulous. I'm familiar with Ernst and she originally started with body for life and switched to leanness lifestyle, so I'm very surprised that she would even focus on scale weight. We all have learned that the scale lies and means nothing especially when your fat percentage reaches the low levels. > > She may not have had 130 pounds of lean mass to begin with. Or she > may have > > dropped 15 pounds of water weight along the way. She would have to > re-evaluate > > how much lean mass she actually has once she's near her goal and > the readings > > are more accurate. The number she started with doesn't really mean > anything 60 > > or 70 pounds later. > > > > Also, remember that she's only 5'2 " . Having 130 lbs of lean mass at > that height > > would make you a little super freak indeed. We're talking tiny > linebacker. :-) > > I'm 5'8 " and I only have 115 pounds of lean mass even with all my > buggy muscles > > and turbo metabolism. So, no, her drop in lean mass doesn't seem > drastic or > > unrealistic to me. Think about bodybuilders who switch to fitness > (Kim Chivesky, > > Mia Finnegan). They drop pounds of muscle intentionally to achieve > a different > > look. I think it's more of a personal decision about how you want > your body to > > look than something unrealistic or dangerous. The only time I would > freak is if > > someone already had a low lean mass for their height and wanted to > lose more, > > like 99 lbs of lean mass on a 5'8 " frame. I had that once, and I > wanted to be > > thinner! Duh! :-) > > > > Your strength levels won't necessarily change if your lean mass > decreases. Lean > > mass is too many other things besides muscle (bone, skin, teeth, > water, internal > > organs). You could get a haircut and technically, that's lost lean > mass. > > > > Because lean mass readings are fairly inaccurate, you kind of have > to guess on > > your protein. I actually go by one gram per pound of *total* body > weight (or > > more). At 135-140 lbs, I usually eat 140-160g of protein. If > someone has a lot > > of weight to lose, I would probably have them go by one gram of > protein per > > pound of their goal weight. You kind of have to see how you feel > and how your > > body responds though. > > > > > > > > > > Re: Ernst & Robin > Castle: Lean Mass? > > > > > > Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds > > lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't > > there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes > > unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting > mass? > > > > However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough > > protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I > > hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows > > me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my > > lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2002 Report Share Posted December 31, 2002 I don't understand this lean mass stuff at all. I just was wondering.... is there anyone on here who is 5'5 and has a scale weight of around 145? That's what I am at now, but I was wondering if you don't mind me asking... of someone on here who is 5'5 and well I guess 15% BF? I haven't determined my BF goal at this point seeing as I have NO idea where I am at now. But I was wondering " ABOUT " what 15% BF would look like on someone who is my height. I hope I wasn't too forward... LOL ~kim Re: Ernst & Robin > Castle: Lean Mass? > > > > > > Hi , I understand what you're saying, but going from 130 pounds > > lean mass to under 115 of lean mass still seems a bit drastic. Isn't > > there a range of lean mass that one can play with before it becomes > > unrealistic to drop below a certain level based on your starting > mass? > > > > However, your explanation explains a lot, should I be eating enough > > protein based on my current lean mass, or based on the lean mass I > > hope to have after weight loss? Also, if my current lean mass allows > > me to lift very heavy poudage,will my strength levels decrease as my > > lean mass lowers or will that remain the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.