Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I had a similar question...I had called for benefits

for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there is

no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I

proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140, 97124,

97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told it

was if it was in the scope of license which I said PT

was in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license.

I was then told after the benefits person consulted

with someone else there that PT was covered under the

rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC and

a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not

licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be

covered by insurance if PT is a service that they

typically cover?

On another issue...is anyone else having trouble with

Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124) when

performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute

billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.

Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is

included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use a

code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They

apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not

performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004

ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this

practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is

considered bundling.

What can we do to end these ridiculous/discriminatory

practices?

Brad Pfeiffer, DC

Bend, OR

--- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:

> Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT codes

> by providers

> (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros

> CHOOSE to use these

> far-from-perfect codes in our

> notes/communications/billings, we are

> agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of the

> terms of use is

> that we are to use the code that most accurately

> describes the service

> rendered.

>

>

>

> >

> >

> > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit

> for the year (a

> mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical

> therapy benefits.

> So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for

> CMT.

> >

> > Insurance companies have bundled these codes

> because they are

> similar in nature, so I would assume that I could

> use the MT code in

> place of the CMT code.

> >

> > Thoughts?

> >

>

>

>

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Brad,

I have received reimbursement from Progressive for massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the 97124 code and of course including the details concerning the massage in my chart notes.

Holzapfel, DCAlbany-- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:I had a similar question...I had called for benefitsfor a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there isno chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. Iproceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140, 97124,97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told itwas if it was in the scope of license which I said PTwas in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license. I was then told after the benefits person consultedwith someone else there that PT was covered under therehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC anda PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we notlicensed as a DC to perform PT and should this becovered by insurance if PT is a service that theytypically cover?On another issue...is anyone else having trouble withProgressive not paying for massage therapy(97124) whenperformed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minutebillable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage. Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 isincluded with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use acode X11. They claim that this is AMA. Theyapparently do pay 97124 on the same day if notperformed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that thispractice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 isconsidered bundling. What can we do to end these ridiculous/discriminatorypractices?Brad Pfeiffer, DCBend, OR--- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:> Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT codes> by providers> (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros> CHOOSE to use these> far-from-perfect codes in our> notes/communications/billings, we are> agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of the> terms of use is> that we are to use the code that most accurately> describes the service> rendered.> > > > >> > > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit> for the year (a> mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical> therapy benefits. > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for> CMT. > > > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes> because they are> similar in nature, so I would assume that I could> use the MT code in> place of the CMT code. > > > > Thoughts?> >> > > > > __________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi ...You must have been dealing with someone at

Progressive other than I am...I have also included the

modifier-59 as well as chart notes which specify the

time spent on massage...but thanks for the info. Maybe

if the claim handler hears that Progressive has

recently paid 97124-59 along with 98940-98942 he will

do the right thing and process to pay.

Brad Pfeiffer, DC

Bend, OR

--- " kjholzdc@... " <kjholzdc@...> wrote:

> Hi Brad,

> I have received reimbursement from Progressive for

> massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the

> 97124 code and of course including the details

> concerning the massage in my chart notes.

> Holzapfel, DC

> Albany

>

> -- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:

> I had a similar question...I had called for benefits

> for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there

> is

> no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I

> proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140,

> 97124,

> 97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told

> it

> was if it was in the scope of license which I said

> PT

> was in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license.

>

> I was then told after the benefits person consulted

> with someone else there that PT was covered under

> the

> rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC

> and

> a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not

> licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be

> covered by insurance if PT is a service that they

> typically cover?

>

> On another issue...is anyone else having trouble

> with

> Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124)

> when

> performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute

> billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.

> Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is

> included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use

> a

> code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They

> apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not

> performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004

> ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this

> practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is

> considered bundling.

> What can we do to end these

> ridiculous/discriminatory

> practices?

>

> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

> Bend, OR

>

> --- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:

>

> > Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT

> codes

> > by providers

> > (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros

> > CHOOSE to use these

> > far-from-perfect codes in our

> > notes/communications/billings, we are

> > agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of

> the

> > terms of use is

> > that we are to use the code that most accurately

> > describes the service

> > rendered.

> >

> >

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit

> > for the year (a

> > mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical

> > therapy benefits.

> > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for

> > CMT.

> > >

> > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes

> > because they are

> > similar in nature, so I would assume that I could

> > use the MT code in

> > place of the CMT code.

> > >

> > > Thoughts?

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I too have not had a problem with this and (gulp) I don't even bother with

the modifier unless it's a 97140 on a separate area.

Dr. ph Medlin D.C.

Spine Tree Chiropractic

1627 NE Alberta St. #6

Portland, OR 97211

Ph: 503-788-6800

c: 503-889-6204

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?

> Hi ...You must have been dealing with someone at

> Progressive other than I am...I have also included the

> modifier-59 as well as chart notes which specify the

> time spent on massage...but thanks for the info. Maybe

> if the claim handler hears that Progressive has

> recently paid 97124-59 along with 98940-98942 he will

> do the right thing and process to pay.

>

> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

> Bend, OR

>

> --- " kjholzdc@... " <kjholzdc@...> wrote:

>

>> Hi Brad,

>> I have received reimbursement from Progressive for

>> massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the

>> 97124 code and of course including the details

>> concerning the massage in my chart notes.

>> Holzapfel, DC

>> Albany

>>

>> -- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:

>> I had a similar question...I had called for benefits

>> for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there

>> is

>> no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I

>> proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140,

>> 97124,

>> 97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told

>> it

>> was if it was in the scope of license which I said

>> PT

>> was in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license.

>>

>> I was then told after the benefits person consulted

>> with someone else there that PT was covered under

>> the

>> rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC

>> and

>> a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not

>> licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be

>> covered by insurance if PT is a service that they

>> typically cover?

>>

>> On another issue...is anyone else having trouble

>> with

>> Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124)

>> when

>> performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute

>> billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.

>> Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is

>> included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use

>> a

>> code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They

>> apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not

>> performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004

>> ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this

>> practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is

>> considered bundling.

>> What can we do to end these

>> ridiculous/discriminatory

>> practices?

>>

>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

>> Bend, OR

>>

>> --- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:

>>

>> > Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT

>> codes

>> > by providers

>> > (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros

>> > CHOOSE to use these

>> > far-from-perfect codes in our

>> > notes/communications/billings, we are

>> > agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of

>> the

>> > terms of use is

>> > that we are to use the code that most accurately

>> > describes the service

>> > rendered.

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit

>> > for the year (a

>> > mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical

>> > therapy benefits.

>> > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for

>> > CMT.

>> > >

>> > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes

>> > because they are

>> > similar in nature, so I would assume that I could

>> > use the MT code in

>> > place of the CMT code.

>> > >

>> > > Thoughts?

>> > >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>> __________________________________________________

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

FYI- 97124 is a " dead code " and really shouldn't be used, falls under the

97140 code, which includes manipulation as well.

Seitz, DC

Tuality Physicians

730-D SE Oak Street

Hillsboro, OR 97123

(503)640-3724

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?

I too have not had a problem with this and (gulp) I don't even bother with

the modifier unless it's a 97140 on a separate area.

Dr. ph Medlin D.C.

Spine Tree Chiropractic

1627 NE Alberta St. #6

Portland, OR 97211

Ph: 503-788-6800

c: 503-889-6204

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?

> Hi ...You must have been dealing with someone at

> Progressive other than I am...I have also included the

> modifier-59 as well as chart notes which specify the

> time spent on massage...but thanks for the info. Maybe

> if the claim handler hears that Progressive has

> recently paid 97124-59 along with 98940-98942 he will

> do the right thing and process to pay.

>

> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

> Bend, OR

>

> --- " kjholzdc@... " <kjholzdc@...> wrote:

>

>> Hi Brad,

>> I have received reimbursement from Progressive for

>> massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the

>> 97124 code and of course including the details

>> concerning the massage in my chart notes.

>> Holzapfel, DC

>> Albany

>>

>> -- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:

>> I had a similar question...I had called for benefits

>> for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there

>> is

>> no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I

>> proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140,

>> 97124,

>> 97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told

>> it

>> was if it was in the scope of license which I said

>> PT

>> was in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license.

>>

>> I was then told after the benefits person consulted

>> with someone else there that PT was covered under

>> the

>> rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC

>> and

>> a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not

>> licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be

>> covered by insurance if PT is a service that they

>> typically cover?

>>

>> On another issue...is anyone else having trouble

>> with

>> Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124)

>> when

>> performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute

>> billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.

>> Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is

>> included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use

>> a

>> code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They

>> apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not

>> performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004

>> ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this

>> practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is

>> considered bundling.

>> What can we do to end these

>> ridiculous/discriminatory

>> practices?

>>

>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

>> Bend, OR

>>

>> --- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:

>>

>> > Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT

>> codes

>> > by providers

>> > (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros

>> > CHOOSE to use these

>> > far-from-perfect codes in our

>> > notes/communications/billings, we are

>> > agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of

>> the

>> > terms of use is

>> > that we are to use the code that most accurately

>> > describes the service

>> > rendered.

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit

>> > for the year (a

>> > mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical

>> > therapy benefits.

>> > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for

>> > CMT.

>> > >

>> > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes

>> > because they are

>> > similar in nature, so I would assume that I could

>> > use the MT code in

>> > place of the CMT code.

>> > >

>> > > Thoughts?

>> > >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>> __________________________________________________

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Okay, what exactly is a "dead code"? Is it "dead" if still being reimbursed for? Or is it "dead" because 97140 is a better or preferable code? Personally, I don't recall having used 97140 as it has appeared many other providers have had difficulty being reimbursed for 97140 in conjunction with 98940, etc. I'm always on the lookout for a more efficient and workable solution. Thanks...

J. Holzapfel, DC

Albany

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:59:01 -0700 " Seitz" <dcdocbrian@...> writes:

FYI- 97124 is a "dead code" and really shouldn't be used, falls under the97140 code, which includes manipulation as well. Seitz, DCTuality Physicians730-D SE Oak StreetHillsboro, OR 97123(503)640-3724 Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?I too have not had a problem with this and (gulp) I don't even bother with the modifier unless it's a 97140 on a separate area.Dr. ph Medlin D.C.Spine Tree Chiropractic1627 NE Alberta St. #6Portland, OR 97211Ph: 503-788-6800c: 503-889-6204 Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?> Hi ...You must have been dealing with someone at> Progressive other than I am...I have also included the> modifier-59 as well as chart notes which specify the> time spent on massage...but thanks for the info. Maybe> if the claim handler hears that Progressive has> recently paid 97124-59 along with 98940-98942 he will> do the right thing and process to pay.>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC> Bend, OR>> --- "kjholzdc@..." <kjholzdc@...> wrote:>>> Hi Brad,>> I have received reimbursement from Progressive for>> massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the>> 97124 code and of course including the details>> concerning the massage in my chart notes.>> Holzapfel, DC>> Albany>>>> -- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:>> I had a similar question...I had called for benefits>> for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there>> is>> no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I>> proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140,>> 97124,>> 97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told>> it>> was if it was in the scope of license which I said>> PT>> was in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license.>>>> I was then told after the benefits person consulted>> with someone else there that PT was covered under>> the>> rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC>> and>> a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not>> licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be>> covered by insurance if PT is a service that they>> typically cover?>>>> On another issue...is anyone else having trouble>> with>> Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124)>> when>> performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute>> billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.>> Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is>> included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use>> a>> code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They>> apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not>> performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004>> ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this>> practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is>> considered bundling.>> What can we do to end these>> ridiculous/discriminatory>> practices?>>>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC>> Bend, OR>>>> --- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:>>>> > Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT>> codes>> > by providers>> > (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros>> > CHOOSE to use these>> > far-from-perfect codes in our>> > notes/communications/billings, we are>> > agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of>> the>> > terms of use is>> > that we are to use the code that most accurately>> > describes the service>> > rendered.>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit>> > for the year (a>> > mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical>> > therapy benefits.>> > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for>> > CMT.>> > >>> > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes>> > because they are>> > similar in nature, so I would assume that I could>> > use the MT code in>> > place of the CMT code.>> > >>> > > Thoughts?>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Exactly , i too find it easier to be reimbursed for 97124 and have replaced 97140 with it because of this. Soft tissue mobiliz. to me sounds closer to the adjustment than massage and thats why it draws red flags in my opinion. I think they are completely different procedures and shouldn't be bound together.

Dr. ph Medlin D.C.Spine Tree Chiropractic1627 NE Alberta St. #6Portland, OR 97211Ph: 503-788-6800c: 503-889-6204

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?> Hi ...You must have been dealing with someone at> Progressive other than I am...I have also included the> modifier-59 as well as chart notes which specify the> time spent on massage...but thanks for the info. Maybe> if the claim handler hears that Progressive has> recently paid 97124-59 along with 98940-98942 he will> do the right thing and process to pay.>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC> Bend, OR>> --- "kjholzdc@..." <kjholzdc@...> wrote:>>> Hi Brad,>> I have received reimbursement from Progressive for>> massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the>> 97124 code and of course including the details>> concerning the massage in my chart notes.>> Holzapfel, DC>> Albany>>>> -- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:>> I had a similar question...I had called for benefits>> for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there>> is>> no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I>> proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140,>> 97124,>> 97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told>> it>> was if it was in the scope of license which I said>> PT>> was in the scope of the Oregon chiropractic license.>>>> I was then told after the benefits person consulted>> with someone else there that PT was covered under>> the>> rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC>> and>> a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not>> licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be>> covered by insurance if PT is a service that they>> typically cover?>>>> On another issue...is anyone else having trouble>> with>> Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124)>> when>> performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute>> billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.>> Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is>> included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use>> a>> code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They>> apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not>> performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004>> ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this>> practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is>> considered bundling.>> What can we do to end these>> ridiculous/discriminatory>> practices?>>>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC>> Bend, OR>>>> --- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:>>>> > Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT>> codes>> > by providers>> > (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros>> > CHOOSE to use these>> > far-from-perfect codes in our>> > notes/communications/billings, we are>> > agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of>> the>> > terms of use is>> > that we are to use the code that most accurately>> > describes the service>> > rendered.>> > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit>> > for the year (a>> > mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical>> > therapy benefits.>> > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for>> > CMT.>> > >>> > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes>> > because they are>> > similar in nature, so I would assume that I could>> > use the MT code in>> > place of the CMT code.>> > >>> > > Thoughts?>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oops! I believe I mis-spoke on this

issue. However, I have treated this code as “dead” since having

insurance problems a few years back. I do use the 97140 when performing

deep tissue work, and if it prolonged and utilized in conjunction with

manipulation will use 2 units (97140 and 98940 have similar RVUs). Some

personal health insurers do not pay for “massage” but will pay the

97140 code. Sorry for my mis-information! I shot from the hip on this

one.

Seitz, DC

Tuality Physicians

730-D SE Oak Street

Hillsboro,

OR 97123

(503)640-3724

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of KEVIN J HOLZAPFEL DC

Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:55

PM

Subject: Re: Re:

Manual Therapy=CMT?

Okay, what exactly is a " dead code " ? Is it

" dead " if still being reimbursed for? Or is it " dead "

because 97140 is a better or preferable code? Personally, I don't recall

having used 97140 as it has appeared many other providers have had

difficulty being reimbursed for 97140 in conjunction with 98940,

etc. I'm always on the lookout for a more efficient and workable

solution. Thanks...

J. Holzapfel, DC

Albany

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:59:01 -0700 " Seitz " <dcdocbrian@...> writes:

FYI-

97124 is a " dead

code " and really shouldn't be used, falls under the

97140 code, which includes manipulation as well.

Seitz, DC

Tuality Physicians

730-D SE Oak Street

Hillsboro, OR 97123

(503)640-3724

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?

I too have not had a problem with this and (gulp) I don't even bother with

the modifier unless it's a 97140 on a separate area.

Dr. ph Medlin D.C.

Spine Tree Chiropractic

1627 NE Alberta St. #6

Portland, OR

97211

Ph: 503-788-6800

c: 503-889-6204

Re: Re: Manual Therapy=CMT?

> Hi ...You must have been dealing with someone at

> Progressive other than I am...I have also included the

> modifier-59 as well as chart notes which specify the

> time spent on massage...but thanks for the info. Maybe

> if the claim handler hears that Progressive has

> recently paid 97124-59 along with 98940-98942 he will

> do the right thing and process to pay.

>

> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

> Bend, OR

>

> --- " kjholzdc@... " <kjholzdc@...> wrote:

>

>> Hi Brad,

>> I have received reimbursement from Progressive for

>> massage only by attaching the -59 modifier to the

>> 97124 code and of course including the details

>> concerning the massage in my chart notes.

>> Holzapfel, DC

>> Albany

>>

>> -- Brad Pfeiffer <hollyandbrad@...> wrote:

>> I had a similar question...I had called for benefits

>> for a patient with Regence BCBS of Oregon and there

>> is

>> no chiropractic benefit on his particular policy. I

>> proceeded to ask if physical therapy(ex:97140,

>> 97124,

>> 97012, 97035, 97014, etc.) was covered and was told

>> it

>> was if it was in the scope of license which I said

>> PT

>> was in the scope of the Oregon

chiropractic license.

>>

>> I was then told after the benefits person consulted

>> with someone else there that PT was covered under

>> the

>> rehab care benefit if I was dual licensed as a DC

>> and

>> a PT. This to me sounds discriminatory. Are we not

>> licensed as a DC to perform PT and should this be

>> covered by insurance if PT is a service that they

>> typically cover?

>>

>> On another issue...is anyone else having trouble

>> with

>> Progressive not paying for massage therapy(97124)

>> when

>> performed with an adjustment? I do mean a 15 minute

>> billable 97124 and not a quicky 2 minute massage.

>> Their explaination of payment suggests that 97124 is

>> included with manipulation codes (ex:98941) They use

>> a

>> code X11. They claim that this is AMA. They

>> apparently do pay 97124 on the same day if not

>> performed/billed by the DC. I have read in the 2004

>> ChiroCode DeskBook on pages 99C-100C that this

>> practice of not paying 97124 with 98940-98942 is

>> considered bundling.

>> What can we do to end these

>> ridiculous/discriminatory

>> practices?

>>

>> Brad Pfeiffer, DC

>> Bend, OR

>>

>> --- spbkchiro97132 <spbkchiro@...> wrote:

>>

>> > Insurance contracts require the use of the CPT

>> codes

>> > by providers

>> > (copyright of the good old AMA) and if we chiros

>> > CHOOSE to use these

>> > far-from-perfect codes in our

>> > notes/communications/billings, we are

>> > agreeing to the terms of use by default. One of

>> the

>> > terms of use is

>> > that we are to use the code that most accurately

>> > describes the service

>> > rendered.

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > I have a patient who has exhausted her CMT limit

>> > for the year (a

>> > mind numbing 8 visits), but she still has physical

>> > therapy benefits.

>> > So I am wondering if I can bill manual therapy for

>> > CMT.

>> > >

>> > > Insurance companies have bundled these codes

>> > because they are

>> > similar in nature, so I would assume that I could

>> > use the MT code in

>> > place of the CMT code.

>> > >

>> > > Thoughts?

>> > >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>> __________________________________________________

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...