Guest guest Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 I guess I've just been fortunate, . No one has ever, ever asked what 's IQ score was, even though it was made available to us years ago. It never affected any service he received while in school and was never referred to as a way to get more or less of a therapy. He's classified as a MR student and we've been given anything we've asked for from inclusion down to speech therapy 3x a week. I just thought that the score came from the various tests they conducted, none which mattered to me at the time.....I knew his capabilities and conveyed that in questions asked of me by the psychologist and we moved on from there as a team and developed a plan. Maybe we are lucky to live in the district we do, but I never felt like they were doing any tests to exclude him or undermine us, but rather get more information to build his IEP with. I know it probably isn't the same everywhere. There are always exceptions to the rule. Jackie > > > > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but why all the paranoia about an IQ > score? > > For many reasons, especially if your child needs more speech. There is that > thing that could pop up that says something like " Speech abilities > commeserate with cognitive abilities " . Children could lose speech therapy. > I have Libby's book at work - otherwise, I'd quote her. > > I'm part of the system so to speak and I always here " so what is his/her > IQ " - like that is the most important thing about a child without finding > out what their strengths and needs are first. I don't want my child labeled > based on a number. > > Also, most of those tests are verbally based. I reviewed a child's psych > eval who has a hearing impairment. Sure enough, he showed up being in the > MR range. When a TONI was done, his cognitive level jumped to the normal > range. Parents have to be careful. > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/16/2005 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/1/2005 5:39:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbocci55@... writes: I'm curious, when they say " he needs " to be at the alternative placement, does that mean they can force that on you or can you get around their recommendation? And if you choose not to follow their recommendation, does that mean you would have to go through due process to prove otherwise? What they say this year was, if I pushed for him to stay at East Dale or refused to allow him to go to Barrackville they wouldn't force the issue. They also insisted (my words as they kept bringing it up) that we at least let Nick visit their proposed placement twice and if they could get permission, I could visit it as well, before any decision was made. One reason, I feel they (meaning BOE personnel) have back down is the principal doesn't see any reason to move Nick, the SLP doesn't and the OT doesn't. The Special Ed teacher felt the other teacher had more experience but felt he could do what she did in her classroom in his; that is until the lady from the BOE came and talked to him the day of the IEP. At that point, he seemed resigned to Nick moving, but as far as I know isn't opposed to having Nick back. Cari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/1/2005 5:39:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbocci55@... writes: I'm curious, when they say " he needs " to be at the alternative placement, does that mean they can force that on you or can you get around their recommendation? And if you choose not to follow their recommendation, does that mean you would have to go through due process to prove otherwise? What they say this year was, if I pushed for him to stay at East Dale or refused to allow him to go to Barrackville they wouldn't force the issue. They also insisted (my words as they kept bringing it up) that we at least let Nick visit their proposed placement twice and if they could get permission, I could visit it as well, before any decision was made. One reason, I feel they (meaning BOE personnel) have back down is the principal doesn't see any reason to move Nick, the SLP doesn't and the OT doesn't. The Special Ed teacher felt the other teacher had more experience but felt he could do what she did in her classroom in his; that is until the lady from the BOE came and talked to him the day of the IEP. At that point, he seemed resigned to Nick moving, but as far as I know isn't opposed to having Nick back. Cari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/1/2005 8:12:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbocci55@... writes: No one has ever, ever asked what 's IQ score was, even though it was made available to us years ago. It They don't have to ask because it is in his records and everyone has access to it. I am so glad that everything worked out so well for you and for . You have been very fortunate and I am so glad that you have been. I have just recently heard of a case (from the mother) h where a child with DS tested borderline normal and has been denied services such as Physical therapy (which this child has great need of) . What in the heck does IQ have to do with the physical movement, or lack Thereof, of your body?? Anyway, IQ scoring is a double edged sword. I have many teachers in my family and one just recently told me that her school does across the board IQ testing in 1st grade because she is in a largely minority school district. This is a way to test all the children on the outdated theory that children of minority heritage have lower IQ " S and need help. (ie special ed) I personally think this is just flat out discrimination and would scream if I knew this was going on in my district. But there you have it. Loree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/1/2005 8:12:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbocci55@... writes: No one has ever, ever asked what 's IQ score was, even though it was made available to us years ago. It They don't have to ask because it is in his records and everyone has access to it. I am so glad that everything worked out so well for you and for . You have been very fortunate and I am so glad that you have been. I have just recently heard of a case (from the mother) h where a child with DS tested borderline normal and has been denied services such as Physical therapy (which this child has great need of) . What in the heck does IQ have to do with the physical movement, or lack Thereof, of your body?? Anyway, IQ scoring is a double edged sword. I have many teachers in my family and one just recently told me that her school does across the board IQ testing in 1st grade because she is in a largely minority school district. This is a way to test all the children on the outdated theory that children of minority heritage have lower IQ " S and need help. (ie special ed) I personally think this is just flat out discrimination and would scream if I knew this was going on in my district. But there you have it. Loree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Hi, Just once more I'm gonna give my opinion here- I agree with jackie and to assess some state services, they do require a score. I think if we are advocating for our children, a few numbers shouldnt make the difference. 's score has never been used against her, in fact, we used it to change her placement which we felt we needed to do for HS-I do not believe that it will be used against her. She had an interview with the school and her teachers for next year and the guidance counselor, and I believe that her performance in the interview weighed much more heavily than her few numbers of her IQ. They told her she would read 'The Grapes of Wrath', just like everyone else. And she could take her electives in her areas of interest- music, theater and dance. They told her friend he could take his electives in his area of interest- art and cartooning. I dont believe they checked their scores. Again, just my opinion- but advocate we do and usually in the best interest of our child. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Hi, Just once more I'm gonna give my opinion here- I agree with jackie and to assess some state services, they do require a score. I think if we are advocating for our children, a few numbers shouldnt make the difference. 's score has never been used against her, in fact, we used it to change her placement which we felt we needed to do for HS-I do not believe that it will be used against her. She had an interview with the school and her teachers for next year and the guidance counselor, and I believe that her performance in the interview weighed much more heavily than her few numbers of her IQ. They told her she would read 'The Grapes of Wrath', just like everyone else. And she could take her electives in her areas of interest- music, theater and dance. They told her friend he could take his electives in his area of interest- art and cartooning. I dont believe they checked their scores. Again, just my opinion- but advocate we do and usually in the best interest of our child. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 > > Hi, > Just once more I'm gonna give my opinion here- I agree with jackie and to > assess some state services, they do require a score. I think if we are > advocating for our children, a few numbers shouldnt make the difference. , read my response to Jackie. has great speech abilities, but if she needed alot of speech in school, her psychological testing could be held against her. Hence, a few numbers could make a HUGE difference. has been tested, privately. I did use that for accessing state services (MR Waiver) - but the results are a private matter and to be shared with only those who must need it (our MR agency). --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 > > Hi, > Just once more I'm gonna give my opinion here- I agree with jackie and to > assess some state services, they do require a score. I think if we are > advocating for our children, a few numbers shouldnt make the difference. , read my response to Jackie. has great speech abilities, but if she needed alot of speech in school, her psychological testing could be held against her. Hence, a few numbers could make a HUGE difference. has been tested, privately. I did use that for accessing state services (MR Waiver) - but the results are a private matter and to be shared with only those who must need it (our MR agency). --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 I guess back when they did the testing on I figured it was to prove he needed services, not to deny him services. Yes, I do believe I am fortunate and regret that some parents are denied inclusion due to an IQ score. My understanding was that the IEP drives the services and not a score on a test. Another case of it not being the same everywhere! Jackie -------------- Original message -------------- In a message dated 4/1/2005 8:12:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbocci55@... writes: No one has ever, ever asked what 's IQ score was, even though it was made available to us years ago. It They don't have to ask because it is in his records and everyone has access to it. I am so glad that everything worked out so well for you and for . You have been very fortunate and I am so glad that you have been. I have just recently heard of a case (from the mother) h where a child with DS tested borderline normal and has been denied services such as Physical therapy (which this child has great need of) . What in the heck does IQ have to do with the physical movement, or lack Thereof, of your body?? Anyway, IQ scoring is a double edged sword. I have many teachers in my family and one just recently told me that her school does across the board IQ testing in 1st grade because she is in a largely minority school district. This is a way to test all the children on the outdated theory that children of minority heritage have lower IQ " S and need help. (ie special ed) I personally think this is just flat out discrimination and would scream if I knew this was going on in my district. But there you have it. Loree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 I guess back when they did the testing on I figured it was to prove he needed services, not to deny him services. Yes, I do believe I am fortunate and regret that some parents are denied inclusion due to an IQ score. My understanding was that the IEP drives the services and not a score on a test. Another case of it not being the same everywhere! Jackie -------------- Original message -------------- In a message dated 4/1/2005 8:12:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbocci55@... writes: No one has ever, ever asked what 's IQ score was, even though it was made available to us years ago. It They don't have to ask because it is in his records and everyone has access to it. I am so glad that everything worked out so well for you and for . You have been very fortunate and I am so glad that you have been. I have just recently heard of a case (from the mother) h where a child with DS tested borderline normal and has been denied services such as Physical therapy (which this child has great need of) . What in the heck does IQ have to do with the physical movement, or lack Thereof, of your body?? Anyway, IQ scoring is a double edged sword. I have many teachers in my family and one just recently told me that her school does across the board IQ testing in 1st grade because she is in a largely minority school district. This is a way to test all the children on the outdated theory that children of minority heritage have lower IQ " S and need help. (ie special ed) I personally think this is just flat out discrimination and would scream if I knew this was going on in my district. But there you have it. Loree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 , I know what you said to jackie and amanda has never been denied speech services or any other services. She had an incredible speech teacher that was the same person all through elementary school. And although amanda is very verbal, I still like to credit her speech teacher to some degree. We have been very fourtunate that amanda's schooling has been driven by her IEP and modified and adjusted as necessary. But without an IQ score, we would be denied other fabulous services that we get from the state- having DS is not qualifying in itself for medicaid or its related services like service coordination and in home reshab. Were I to do it over again with all that I know now, I would still be ok with the decision I made for amanda and each one of our family members is different and we have to do what we feel is best for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 I have a friend here in San Diego who had services denied for her daugher (wDS) after she agreed to an IQ test at her trienial. The little girl was barely 3, transitioning from Early Intervention to school district services, and because she tested 1 point over the MR " cutoff " , they denied her several things (can't remember what..... speech was one). She had to fight and fight and fight to try and get necessary services. Now that she is in kindergarten though, the districit doesn't want her fully included. So, at age 3, so was so smart they didn't think she needed services, but by 5, she couldn't be fully included. They are using her IQ score (which, is it even accurate at this age?) to drive what they think at the moment. Not that all districts will be like that..... ours has assured us that they " would never do something like that " . However, they cannot demonstrate any reason that knowing 's IQ would help them teach her better, so we have politely refused each time it has come up. I also think that because many of our kids work up to a " higher potential " then their IQ score suggests, some teachers MAY have lower expectations for their abilities if they were met with a score, rather than looking at what the child can do. Obviously all teachers would not be biased in this way, but some might, and to me, that's too much of a risk. reads at grade level...... she's not even in the lowest reading group. This is amazing, and probably unexpected for a 1st grader with DS (or MR, since if testing is accurate at 2 years 10 months, she tests in the mild MR range) If the first grade teacher had seen an IQ score indicating that she was MR , would she have persisted through the times that refused to read (later to find out that it was when she moved up a reading level and there was smaller font and more words on the page....... just said " I can't do it " .... would the teacher have said, well, she's MR, I guess it's to be expected.????) I don't know the asnwers, but IMHO, unless as a parent you feel the score would be beneficial to your child, it's not worth it. Just my 2 cents. , mom to (9), (7 DS), and (5) wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>Just once more I'm gonna give my opinion here- I agree with jackie and to >>assess some state services, they do require a score. I think if we are >>advocating for our children, a few numbers shouldnt make the difference. >> >> > >, read my response to Jackie. has great speech abilities, but >if she needed alot of speech in school, her psychological testing could be >held against her. Hence, a few numbers could make a HUGE difference. > has been tested, privately. I did use that for accessing state >services (MR Waiver) - but the results are a private matter and to be shared >with only those who must need it (our MR agency). > > > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 > > > > >Click reply to all for messages to go to the list. Just hit reply for messages to go to the sender of the message. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 I have a friend here in San Diego who had services denied for her daugher (wDS) after she agreed to an IQ test at her trienial. The little girl was barely 3, transitioning from Early Intervention to school district services, and because she tested 1 point over the MR " cutoff " , they denied her several things (can't remember what..... speech was one). She had to fight and fight and fight to try and get necessary services. Now that she is in kindergarten though, the districit doesn't want her fully included. So, at age 3, so was so smart they didn't think she needed services, but by 5, she couldn't be fully included. They are using her IQ score (which, is it even accurate at this age?) to drive what they think at the moment. Not that all districts will be like that..... ours has assured us that they " would never do something like that " . However, they cannot demonstrate any reason that knowing 's IQ would help them teach her better, so we have politely refused each time it has come up. I also think that because many of our kids work up to a " higher potential " then their IQ score suggests, some teachers MAY have lower expectations for their abilities if they were met with a score, rather than looking at what the child can do. Obviously all teachers would not be biased in this way, but some might, and to me, that's too much of a risk. reads at grade level...... she's not even in the lowest reading group. This is amazing, and probably unexpected for a 1st grader with DS (or MR, since if testing is accurate at 2 years 10 months, she tests in the mild MR range) If the first grade teacher had seen an IQ score indicating that she was MR , would she have persisted through the times that refused to read (later to find out that it was when she moved up a reading level and there was smaller font and more words on the page....... just said " I can't do it " .... would the teacher have said, well, she's MR, I guess it's to be expected.????) I don't know the asnwers, but IMHO, unless as a parent you feel the score would be beneficial to your child, it's not worth it. Just my 2 cents. , mom to (9), (7 DS), and (5) wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>Just once more I'm gonna give my opinion here- I agree with jackie and to >>assess some state services, they do require a score. I think if we are >>advocating for our children, a few numbers shouldnt make the difference. >> >> > >, read my response to Jackie. has great speech abilities, but >if she needed alot of speech in school, her psychological testing could be >held against her. Hence, a few numbers could make a HUGE difference. > has been tested, privately. I did use that for accessing state >services (MR Waiver) - but the results are a private matter and to be shared >with only those who must need it (our MR agency). > > > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 > > > > >Click reply to all for messages to go to the list. Just hit reply for messages to go to the sender of the message. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/2/2005 5:39:26 PM Central Standard Time, linman42@... writes: Were I to do it over again with all that I know now, I would still be ok with the decision I made for amanda and each one of our family members is different and we have to do what we feel is best for them. Hi I have one suggestion ............. don't leave your area lol because an IQ score will follow your child and certain parts of the country (my area included) it could be detrimental. The reason I opt OUT on IQ testing ................. Mike's always talking about moving and I don't want to do anything to hinder placement, services etc .... for Sara IMHO Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/2/2005 5:39:26 PM Central Standard Time, linman42@... writes: Were I to do it over again with all that I know now, I would still be ok with the decision I made for amanda and each one of our family members is different and we have to do what we feel is best for them. Hi I have one suggestion ............. don't leave your area lol because an IQ score will follow your child and certain parts of the country (my area included) it could be detrimental. The reason I opt OUT on IQ testing ................. Mike's always talking about moving and I don't want to do anything to hinder placement, services etc .... for Sara IMHO Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/2/2005 10:06:50 AM Central Standard Time, linman42@... writes: I agree with jackie and to assess some state services, they do require a score. HI If it were me I definitely would NOT rely on the school Psych do testing Sara needed for state services. IMHO I would have a private testing for that, using tools that would give a valid score. Sara's biggest deficit is language and if the Stanford-Binet, or Wechsler Intelligence Scales or other similar tests were given then it would produce an inaccurate score, no validity. If parents are going to say yes to IQ testing then carefully look at the test used. There are tests which are more appropriate for kids with language delays ............. this advice was given to me by my uncle (Psych ) who tests children and prisoners for disabilities. Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 In a message dated 4/2/2005 10:06:50 AM Central Standard Time, linman42@... writes: I agree with jackie and to assess some state services, they do require a score. HI If it were me I definitely would NOT rely on the school Psych do testing Sara needed for state services. IMHO I would have a private testing for that, using tools that would give a valid score. Sara's biggest deficit is language and if the Stanford-Binet, or Wechsler Intelligence Scales or other similar tests were given then it would produce an inaccurate score, no validity. If parents are going to say yes to IQ testing then carefully look at the test used. There are tests which are more appropriate for kids with language delays ............. this advice was given to me by my uncle (Psych ) who tests children and prisoners for disabilities. Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 But without an IQ score, we would > be denied other fabulous services that we get from the state- having DS is not > qualifying in itself for medicaid or its related services like service > coordination and in home reshab. Yes, for state, non-school services, this is needed. I believe it's a federal requirment for MR Medicaid Waiver programs. What I am saying is that for school purposes, parents need to avoid having the school evaluate their child. Some parents take those private evaluations and " cut out " what they want to keep private and then share with the school system. The school system should have nothing to do with medicaid, service coordination, etc. when it comes to eligibility for those services. I'm laughing here b/c 's teacher is very involved on a state level and helped us get Waiver for . (I also wrote letters and officials at Tim's national union office did their share, too). We got lucky that he has a teacher with so many state and local contacts in MR services outside of her work with the school system. Most teachers do not. The MR agency never even asked for a copy of 's IEP during the initial intake process- but his case manager did attend the meeting on Friday and took a copy with him. , I'm so jealous that you all have such fabulous services in Brooklyn. VA has a long way to go. Once turns 13, he can join this Saturday club. Now that our family composition is changing in a few months, it's imperative that has friends. He's going to be heartbroken when Katey goes to college. Thank God is moving back home in September while Matt is deployed to Iraq again. Meanwhile, I want to pull together some program ideas for the local children and families. I have several parents who are willing to help me when the time comes. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 But without an IQ score, we would > be denied other fabulous services that we get from the state- having DS is not > qualifying in itself for medicaid or its related services like service > coordination and in home reshab. Yes, for state, non-school services, this is needed. I believe it's a federal requirment for MR Medicaid Waiver programs. What I am saying is that for school purposes, parents need to avoid having the school evaluate their child. Some parents take those private evaluations and " cut out " what they want to keep private and then share with the school system. The school system should have nothing to do with medicaid, service coordination, etc. when it comes to eligibility for those services. I'm laughing here b/c 's teacher is very involved on a state level and helped us get Waiver for . (I also wrote letters and officials at Tim's national union office did their share, too). We got lucky that he has a teacher with so many state and local contacts in MR services outside of her work with the school system. Most teachers do not. The MR agency never even asked for a copy of 's IEP during the initial intake process- but his case manager did attend the meeting on Friday and took a copy with him. , I'm so jealous that you all have such fabulous services in Brooklyn. VA has a long way to go. Once turns 13, he can join this Saturday club. Now that our family composition is changing in a few months, it's imperative that has friends. He's going to be heartbroken when Katey goes to college. Thank God is moving back home in September while Matt is deployed to Iraq again. Meanwhile, I want to pull together some program ideas for the local children and families. I have several parents who are willing to help me when the time comes. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release Date: 2/17/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2005 Report Share Posted April 3, 2005 In a message dated 4/3/2005 6:16:10 AM Central Standard Time, mom2bridget@... writes: Kathy, Which test are suggested? How do we find out about them? Bridget was just retested by the schools (Our schools are under court order due to inappropriate placements) and used the 2 test you listed. I feel they are not good test, but do not know where to find something more appropriate. (mom to Bridget 11) Hi Years back Green told me to look at the TONI or Leiter, both are geared for kids with language delays. I asked my uncle about these two tests and he agreed this would be more appropriate for Sara. Luckily when the Reval meeting came around I just asked if anyone thought Sara had no MR? All agreed she did so I ended the meeting with OK no need to assess her. At Sara's initial evaluation Sara did have an IQ test .................. I call this time Pre-Workshop days lol I allowed to many things back then lol Now because I did allow an invalid test to be done on Sara, I did demand they black out the score and the only paper to be in the school file is the summary (which was surprising accurate) My sister who taught in my area told me to NEVER let the scores into the schools, she said Reg Ed teachers who may get your child will FREAK if they found out the IQ score of a child coming into their class (just their lack of knowledge and fear) I also know of a child who had an invalid test done and scored a 20 .............. very low. Yrs later he is now reading on a 3rd grade reading level at age 11. Anyway I am passionate in making sure accurate tests are done in school, the medical arena etc .......... Sara could be like me and have test phobia too lol Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2005 Report Share Posted April 3, 2005 In a message dated 4/3/2005 6:16:10 AM Central Standard Time, mom2bridget@... writes: Kathy, Which test are suggested? How do we find out about them? Bridget was just retested by the schools (Our schools are under court order due to inappropriate placements) and used the 2 test you listed. I feel they are not good test, but do not know where to find something more appropriate. (mom to Bridget 11) Hi Years back Green told me to look at the TONI or Leiter, both are geared for kids with language delays. I asked my uncle about these two tests and he agreed this would be more appropriate for Sara. Luckily when the Reval meeting came around I just asked if anyone thought Sara had no MR? All agreed she did so I ended the meeting with OK no need to assess her. At Sara's initial evaluation Sara did have an IQ test .................. I call this time Pre-Workshop days lol I allowed to many things back then lol Now because I did allow an invalid test to be done on Sara, I did demand they black out the score and the only paper to be in the school file is the summary (which was surprising accurate) My sister who taught in my area told me to NEVER let the scores into the schools, she said Reg Ed teachers who may get your child will FREAK if they found out the IQ score of a child coming into their class (just their lack of knowledge and fear) I also know of a child who had an invalid test done and scored a 20 .............. very low. Yrs later he is now reading on a 3rd grade reading level at age 11. Anyway I am passionate in making sure accurate tests are done in school, the medical arena etc .......... Sara could be like me and have test phobia too lol Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2005 Report Share Posted April 3, 2005 Kathy, Which test are suggested? How do we find out about them? Bridget was just retested by the schools (Our schools are under court order due to inappropriate placements) and used the 2 test you listed. I feel they are not good test, but do not know where to find something more appropriate. (mom to Bridget 11) HI If it were me I definitely would NOT rely on the school Psych do testing Sara needed for state services. IMHO I would have a private testing for that, using tools that would give a valid score. Sara's biggest deficit is language and if the Stanford-Binet, or Wechsler Intelligence Scales or other similar tests were given then it would produce an inaccurate score, no validity. If parents are going to say yes to IQ testing then carefully look at the test used. There are tests which are more appropriate for kids with language delays ............. this advice was given to me by my uncle (Psych ) who tests children and prisoners for disabilities. Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2005 Report Share Posted April 3, 2005 Kathy, Which test are suggested? How do we find out about them? Bridget was just retested by the schools (Our schools are under court order due to inappropriate placements) and used the 2 test you listed. I feel they are not good test, but do not know where to find something more appropriate. (mom to Bridget 11) HI If it were me I definitely would NOT rely on the school Psych do testing Sara needed for state services. IMHO I would have a private testing for that, using tools that would give a valid score. Sara's biggest deficit is language and if the Stanford-Binet, or Wechsler Intelligence Scales or other similar tests were given then it would produce an inaccurate score, no validity. If parents are going to say yes to IQ testing then carefully look at the test used. There are tests which are more appropriate for kids with language delays ............. this advice was given to me by my uncle (Psych ) who tests children and prisoners for disabilities. Kathy mom to Sara 13 ¸...¸ ___/ /\ \___ ¸...¸ ,·´º o`·, /__/ _/\_ \__\ ,·´º o`·, ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | | | ```)¨(´´´ ¸,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸ `°²·-.¸ As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Josh. 24:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2005 Report Share Posted April 3, 2005 In a message dated 4/2/2005 8:08:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cindysue@... writes: VA has a long way to go. Amen to that! Cheryl in VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.