Guest guest Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 True, but just post your message at the top. -- In Dr , " Hutton " <angeltoes@n...> wrote: > > Please when you reply to the list take the time to make sure that you have > not included all that has gone before. an easy way to do this is to use the > right mouse key and highlight the areas that have already gone out to the > list before, then backspace to remove that part. it is very frustrating to > try to read the new information without having to wade through all the > repeats > thank you > > > > --- Email Powered By www.Networld.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Yes, but do I agree with and was going to post something regards this too. The thing is even though you post a message at the top, leaving 12 inches of old messages takes up space in the digest that could be used for other messages, i.e. could get 15 messages instead of 3 in a digest. Also it is easier to read your important message, when (most of) the previous already read messages are not included along with it. > > > > Please when you reply to the list take the time to make sure that you have not included all that has gone before. an easy way to do this is to use the right mouse key and highlight the areas that have already gone out to the list before, then backspace to remove that part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 I really like this group, and I love reading what everyone has to say... but, is there a way for members to reply to posts without having to include everything that was written before? (It just keeps things more simple and streamlined.) Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 A snippet of the last post on the topic is important so that members can follow the thread (since often there is more than one topic being discussed at the same time). That said, there is no need to replicate the entire previous post and the entire previous discussion. We do note this in our rules for posting which is automatically sent to all new members and is posted automatically by once every two weeks. However, it's just about nearly impossible to get over 2400 members to follow all minor rules such as this, to the letter. As it is, we reject many posts that don't follow the more important rules we have for posting. Among the more important rules being: to cite appropriate and acceptable references and not post frivolously. But, thanks for the suggestion. If we thought we could succesfully implement it, we would. on 12/31/2006 10:57 AM, lollygoodman888 at lollyg888@... wrote: I really like this group, and I love reading what everyone has to say... but, is there a way for members to reply to posts without having to include everything that was written before? (It just keeps things more simple and streamlined.) Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2007 Report Share Posted May 9, 2007 Dana, Thank heavens for all those 'misfits'!!! on line. I've been reading your posts for many of the years you've so generously shared information about your children in cyberspace. It has been very helpful to me. It's obvious that you've put so much time and effort into this. I remember your first mention long ago of yeast when trying lauricidin. A light bulb moment for me as we were thick into such an awful pattern with lauricidin. The yeast issue made sense and the pattern responded to anti yeast. Only one of the so many helpful comments that you've shared with all of us. Thanks for staying around! , mom of an unrecovered 22 year old and grandma of a recovered 7 year old > > I developed the style which I use to this day, which appears to get my > point across in the most effective and least offensive manner. I > realize that it is not perfect, but long ago I stopped trying for > " fitting in " , which was an unrealistic goal, and started working for > " not standing out " , which is far more achievable, altho still > difficult. If I upset 2-3 people per year, I consider it a major > accomplishment. And yours is the first message I have received this > year, so I went over 5 months before I offended someone, for which I > am very grateful and do NOT at all take for granted. It is still a > lot of work for me. Messages like yours, make me realize I am still > far from meeting my goal. > > I will do as you ask, and choose to no longer reply to your messages, > altho I can't promise I will be 100% successful. But my intent is not > to upset people, so I will do my best. Thank YOU for your patience. > > Please choose not to read my messages, in case I make a mistake and > accidentally reply to you. I assume you are also here to help your > child, and I definitely do not want to discourage that at all. It is > what recovered mine. > > Assuming you made it all the way to this point, I will wish you much > success in finding the supplements that will work for your situation, > and even more success in recovering your child. > > Dana > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.