Guest guest Posted October 28, 2006 Report Share Posted October 28, 2006 And of course the same could be said about vegetarianism/veganism before anything substantial can be concluded about it. We are living in a world of imperfect knowledge. And are likely to be for at least the rest of our lifetimes. So we each have to place our BETS, where we think, based on what we think we know, the greatest advantage lies. Rodney. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have read in numerous places that high-heat cooking > can > > > > > destroy > > > > > > > omega-3 fatty acids, and even alter them into unhealthy > > > fats. > > > > > For > > > > > > > example, see: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.askdrsears.com/html/4/T043800.asp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the same problem apply to cooking fish at high > > > temperature, > > > > > as > > > > > > > implied here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://goodfats.pamrotella.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where it is stated, " ...eating cooked linolenic-rich > fish is > > > > > > unlikely > > > > > > > to provide a sufficient amount [of essential fatty > acids] " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having difficulty finding direct scientific studies > > > relating > > > > > to > > > > > > > this issue of the effects of cooking omega-3 EFAs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2006 Report Share Posted October 28, 2006 One of the problems with the terms " vegan " and/or " vegetarian " is that these terms do not in anyway tell you anything about what a person " does " eat. The only tell you about what a person " doesnt " eat. And, while that is important to some extent, there are way to many variables (and unhealthy foods) in what someone can still eat and still fall under the headings of " vegan " or " vegetarian " for it to be used as a definition that in anyway is attributed to " health " . A diet without meat, chicken, dairy or fish can be healthy if properly planned but can also be very unhealthy. When it comes to health, " health " should be the criteria, not the inclusion or exclusion of animal products. While we can esaily show studies showing less animal products is better, we cant show any studies showing " no " animal products is best. And, the vegan/vegetarian world is as guilty of " spinning " the data in their favor, as is the " spin " from the other side that they frequently point their fingers at. And, from what I see, CR-ON, with an emphasis on ON, seems more important than vegan or vegetarian in relation to health. At least from what I see. And that comes from a long term vegan Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.