Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Hi folks: They said it was a surprise! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5293436.stm Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Hi folks: I may have said the equivalent of this before. But I don't think I have said it quite this way previously. FACT #1: In the case of rhesus monkeys, those fed 30% less of a healthy diet starting at the human-equivalent age of 50, live a total lifespan that is 30% longer than those eating as much as they want of a healthy diet. FACT #2: The average north american human currently lives about 78 years, eating as much as s/he wants of a thoroughly UNhealthy diet. So, how long would the average american live if we all ate as much as we wanted of a diet as free of the bad stuff, and as nutritionally complete as that of the rhesus monkeys? Of course I do not know the answer, but for sake of argument I am going to suggest ten more years, for a lifespan of 88 years. So, if instead of eating as much as one wants of a very healthy diet one were, in addition, to restrict calories to the same extent the experimental rhesus monkeys were restricted, how much longer might north americans live, on average? Perhaps 88 x 1.3 years? If so then that would be an average of 114.4 years. So it may not be unreasonable to project that caloric restrictors may be able, on average, to achieve approximately the age of Esther de Capovilla. FACT #3: The calculation of current life expectancy, 78 years, is based on the performance of today's medicine. Fifty years from now when, with luck, some of us will still be around and healthy, medicine's ability to fix problems will presumably be much improved, perhaps remarkably so, even without revolutionary developments in geriatric medicine. So this is another factor arguing for a still higher average lifespan for today's healthy-nutrition restrictors who are able to take advantage of future advances in medicine. It is nice also that Mrs. Capovilla was reported to have been in great health until shortly before her death. And the fact she died from pneumonia reminds us yet again of the importance of doing everything we can to maintain our immune function. IMO that is a topic that has been inadequately addressed in the material that I have seen posted here. Any suggestions for sources of good information about maintaining a strong immune system, would be helpful. In summary, it is not out of the question that CRers currently aged 50 may enjoy an average lifespan in excess of 110 years. While for those born a century ago such an age is clearly an extreme outlier on the chart. So there are reasons for optimism that we are not wasting the time we spend here at : ^ ))))) Rodney. --- In , " Rodney " <perspect1111@...> wrote: > > Hi folks: > > They said it was a surprise! > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5293436.stm > > Rodney. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.